Greendland - why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly 100,000 is a lowball offer to sell out their homeland.

Seriously. Denmark Offers Greenland:
- Lifetime Free Health Care
- Lifetime Free Education
- Strongest Pension In The World
- Paid Maternity/Paternity Leave
- Free Child Care
- $700 Million Annual Transfer Payment

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly 100,000 is a lowball offer to sell out their homeland.

Seriously. Denmark Offers Greenland:
- Lifetime Free Health Care
- Lifetime Free Education
- Strongest Pension In The World
- Paid Maternity/Paternity Leave
- Free Child Care
- $700 Million Annual Transfer Payment

+1 The Trump administration is nuts to think that the Greenlanders would be happy with this. But no one is talking about Trump's Epstein problems, so I guess he succeeded in wagging the dog.

[Anonymous]

I'm calling Greenland "Epsteinland" from now on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly 100,000 is a lowball offer to sell out their homeland.

Seriously. Denmark Offers Greenland:
- Lifetime Free Health Care
- Lifetime Free Education
- Strongest Pension In The World
- Paid Maternity/Paternity Leave
- Free Child Care
- $700 Million Annual Transfer Payment

It would be a wonderful dream come true if Denmark took over the USA.

[Anonymous]

Why buy the cow if you get the milk for free? The US subsidizes and protects all these weak nations so they can spend money on things besides defense and health care.

If the US stopped doing both (mandated health costs are equal for all countries, not more for the US, and had them defend themselves then they would have to shift their budgets away from all these fun freebies.

[Anonymous]

How much you wanna bet the plan is to turn it into a prison camp for dissenters. Our very own gulag where prisoners mine rare earths and then… die.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

How many Maga voters made $100,000 this year?

that would be the end of trump with his cult. billions to Argentina is abstract. 100,000 to a Greenlander would stick in their craw

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How much you wanna bet the plan is to turn it into a prison camp for dissenters. Our very own gulag where prisoners mine rare earths and then… die.

siberia!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly 100,000 is a lowball offer to sell out their homeland.

Seriously. Denmark Offers Greenland:
- Lifetime Free Health Care
- Lifetime Free Education
- Strongest Pension In The World
- Paid Maternity/Paternity Leave
- Free Child Care
- $700 Million Annual Transfer Payment

It would be a wonderful dream come true if Denmark took over the USA.

Sounds pretty good at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why buy the cow if you get the milk for free? The US subsidizes and protects all these weak nations so they can spend money on things besides defense and health care.

If the US stopped doing both (mandated health costs are equal for all countries, not more for the US, and had them defend themselves then they would have to shift their budgets away from all these fun freebies.

Actually, they wouldn't, unless the US plans to attack them or help Russia attack them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How much you wanna bet the plan is to turn it into a prison camp for dissenters. Our very own gulag where prisoners mine rare earths and then… die.

Unfortunately, I think you are correct.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Russia and China are trying to get it and if they do its a threat to us.

Greenland is part of NATO. The US has a military base there - and used to have six. Which they are welcome to reestablish. Absolutely no one in NATO is denying the American military access to Greenland. The US could put 100,000 troops in Greenland to counter Russia and it would be absolutely fine.

There is zero strategic need to violently take over Greenland. The US already has everything they need from Greenland.

On the other hand, if we try to take over, it would destroy NATO and the US would almost certainly face sanctions at the very least, if not armed hostility with our former allies - which would leave Russia and China with a lot more leeway to do whatever the heck they want. If China wants to retake Taiwan (and its chip factories) or Russia wants to retake parts of Alaska separated from the lower 48 by a hostile Canada, we’re not going to have any friends to help us do anything about it. For that matter, we might have trouble holding unto our other European bases which have been so critical in troop support and rapid deployment, whether because we get evicted or captured.

In short, attacking Greenland would strengthen the strategic position of Russia and China, destabilizing the balance of power and be a crippling blow to our national security. I can only guess that such suggestions come from foreign actors.

Yup. These folks are working for Russia and China. How have white Americans not figured this out yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How much you wanna bet the plan is to turn it into a prison camp for dissenters. Our very own gulag where prisoners mine rare earths and then… die.

Like The Colonies in Gilead.