S/o: Do you support murdering CEOs ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justifying killing this man is mind-boggling to me. There's a public relating to an extreme level of frustration, and then there's celebration for ending the life of someone who was one cog of a giant (broken) machine. This can't be acceptable.

I guess the argument is that these companies and their leaders are ok with killing people for the sake of profit. I guess you don’t get much respect when you earn your living that way.

How does that make everyone shrug off Brian Thompson being gunned down on the street. Vigilante justice is OK when lots of people agree on it, but not OK when public opinion is mostly opposed ... Who gets to decide, under what circumstances. We cannot move forward like this.

The norms of the past are out the window. The internet, globalism, and Trump’s erosion of civility, decency and honor are all factors. One lesson of his success is that if you want something you need to grab it first and worry about the ramifications later. This shooter guy didn’t do very well with the ramifications.

Correct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you expect when these a'holes move as many jobs as they can to binga booga where the average salary is $1/day and then bring in millions of third world laborers?

Biden intentionally flooded the US with unskilled people who walked right over our southern border.

Yawn

It’s boring until they move into your neighborhood.

[Anonymous]

I don’t want anybody killed, but I wouldn’t mind if whoever designed the USAA website got kicked in the butt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m glad the liberals of DC are finally coming out and admitting they’re communists and favor a Bolshevik style revolution.

Jan 6th

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justifying killing this man is mind-boggling to me. There's a public relating to an extreme level of frustration, and then there's celebration for ending the life of someone who was one cog of a giant (broken) machine. This can't be acceptable.

He wasn’t just a cog. He was at the helm of a company that was using technology and third party contracts to maximize company value which resulted in a cloak denial rate well behind the industry standard. There are real humans on the other side of those claims who were harmed and may have died because of this. His actions as a leader were completely depraved. And on top of that he was engaging in inside trading because he just had to become even richer at the expense of others.

Acting like he was some tiny cog is disingenuous. Luigi didn’t kill some random claims processor.

So what. Stull can't kill someone in cold blood. And it is wrong to sympathize with murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justifying killing this man is mind-boggling to me. There's a public relating to an extreme level of frustration, and then there's celebration for ending the life of someone who was one cog of a giant (broken) machine. This can't be acceptable.

I guess the argument is that these companies and their leaders are ok with killing people for the sake of profit. I guess you don’t get much respect when you earn your living that way.

How does that make everyone shrug off Brian Thompson being gunned down on the street. Vigilante justice is OK when lots of people agree on it, but not OK when public opinion is mostly opposed ... Who gets to decide, under what circumstances. We cannot move forward like this.

The norms of the past are out the window. The internet, globalism, and Trump’s erosion of civility, decency and honor are all factors. One lesson of his success is that if you want something you need to grab it first and worry about the ramifications later. This shooter guy didn’t do very well with the ramifications.

We don’t know the full results of his actions yet…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justifying killing this man is mind-boggling to me. There's a public relating to an extreme level of frustration, and then there's celebration for ending the life of someone who was one cog of a giant (broken) machine. This can't be acceptable.

I guess the argument is that these companies and their leaders are ok with killing people for the sake of profit. I guess you don’t get much respect when you earn your living that way.

How does that make everyone shrug off Brian Thompson being gunned down on the street. Vigilante justice is OK when lots of people agree on it, but not OK when public opinion is mostly opposed ... Who gets to decide, under what circumstances. We cannot move forward like this.

The norms of the past are out the window. The internet, globalism, and Trump’s erosion of civility, decency and honor are all factors. One lesson of his success is that if you want something you need to grab it first and worry about the ramifications later. This shooter guy didn’t do very well with the ramifications.

We don’t know the full results of his actions yet…

Getting arrested and charged with first degree murder isn’t a very good start.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you expect when these a'holes move as many jobs as they can to binga booga where the average salary is $1/day and then bring in millions of third world laborers?

Biden intentionally flooded the US with unskilled people who walked right over our southern border.

Yawn

It’s boring until they move into your neighborhood.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Change the question.

Why do you support CEOs killing people every day with their business decisions? Just because it is legal?

How much suffering did wall street bankers impose in the country after 2008 that require us all to collectively bail them out? How much suffering do healthcare exec inflict in thousands of people per day? When the high and nightly inflict suffering they are never punished for their crimes. They are rewarded for it with taxpayer bailouts, higher stock prices, and bigger paychecks.

You're asking the wrong question. Why do you support CEO malfeasance?

Sure ask thst question

Fight for real change which will not happen just by killing a CEO. Only stupid people think that way.

For large organizations, these guys are just as interchangeable. I'm sure there is an acting CEO who took over that guys work.

But this is un-American. Everyone is entitled to a trial by a jury of their peers

Maybe that doesn't matter anymore in this new America

So how do you suppose we change things then? American citizens cannot change the govt because citizens United has given unlimited buying and lobbying power to corporations and special interest groups to corrupt our government. The institutions that are supposed to regulate these businesses have also been captured.

So please tell us all how we are supposed to change this corporate oppression when we can't democratically elect officials to change laws since they're all bought by corporations or are blocked from doing so because of citizens United.

You can’t murder people either to get your way. Back to the drawing board

Fair enough

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Support murder? No.

But it thrills my heart to see someone rising up.

This isn't Les Miz

Lol

[Anonymous]

Here’s another s/o, should a candidate who faked an assasination attempt that led to two deaths be allowed to get away with it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Change the question.

Why do you support CEOs killing people every day with their business decisions? Just because it is legal?

How much suffering did wall street bankers impose in the country after 2008 that require us all to collectively bail them out? How much suffering do healthcare exec inflict in thousands of people per day? When the high and nightly inflict suffering they are never punished for their crimes. They are rewarded for it with taxpayer bailouts, higher stock prices, and bigger paychecks.

You're asking the wrong question. Why do you support CEO malfeasance?

Sure ask thst question

Fight for real change which will not happen just by killing a CEO. Only stupid people think that way.

For large organizations, these guys are just as interchangeable. I'm sure there is an acting CEO who took over that guys work.

But this is un-American. Everyone is entitled to a trial by a jury of their peers

Maybe that doesn't matter anymore in this new America

So how do you suppose we change things then? American citizens cannot change the govt because citizens United has given unlimited buying and lobbying power to corporations and special interest groups to corrupt our government. The institutions that are supposed to regulate these businesses have also been captured.

So please tell us all how we are supposed to change this corporate oppression when we can't democratically elect officials to change laws since they're all bought by corporations or are blocked from doing so because of citizens United.

You can’t murder people either to get your way. Back to the drawing board

Throughout history people have certainly used violence to overthrow the wealthy ruling class keeping them impoverished. Our country was build on escaping an oppressive monarchy. I don’t know why we think there isn’t a tipping point at which people will begin to return to violence. As a PP mentioned Citizens United was a gateway decision that gave limitless power to our corporate overlords and all the legal methods of trying to pass reform for the working and middle class are essentially nullified.

It’s unrealistic to think there isn’t a rock bottom in which wealth inequality gets so bad that enough people revolt. I hope we don’t get to that point, and if it does it may not be within our lifetimes. But the growing wealth gap cannot keep accelerating at the same pace without a societal upheaval.

Good lord!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s another s/o, should a candidate who faked an assasination attempt that led to two deaths be allowed to get away with it?

No. Any candidate who faked an assassination attempt should be prosecuted. Do you have someone in mind?

[Anonymous]

Or should someone who tried to assassin a country be allowed to run for office again? Just asking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s another s/o, should a candidate who faked an assasination attempt that led to two deaths be allowed to get away with it?

No. Any candidate who faked an assassination attempt should be prosecuted. Do you have someone in mind?

How about a brain-dead office holder who is propped up by devious underlings who would rather see the organization fall apart than expose the office holder’s incapacitation? Anybody in that farfetched hypothetical scenario deserve punishment?