IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know we live in a clown world banana republic when hard evidence of the President of the United States accepting multi-million dollar bribes to peddle his political influence and the establishment completely ignores it.

We are watching the ending of a once great republic


But they don't have hard evidence. They are still citing stupid things like the FD-1023 which contains second-hand rumor of a big bribe, which in fact was false info planted by Lev Parnas and Rudy Giuliani. Lev came out and admitted it.


They do have bank transfers. Those are not second hand, those are direct transfers to the bidet's family members.


Bank transfers for work done or for deals that have contracts associated with them. Where are the bank deposits from the bribes?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:You know we live in a clown world banana republic when hard evidence of the President of the United States accepting multi-million dollar bribes to peddle his political influence and the establishment completely ignores it.

We are watching the ending of a once great republic


But they don't have hard evidence. They are still citing stupid things like the FD-1023 which contains second-hand rumor of a big bribe, which in fact was false info planted by Lev Parnas and Rudy Giuliani. Lev came out and admitted it.


They do have bank transfers. Those are not second hand, those are direct transfers to the bidet's family members.


And what Biden policy was bought? The Ukraine defense which all of the West (and many Republicans) vociferously supports?


Completely predictable response. The crime is the payment. Accepting the payment from a foreign official. There is the registered foreign part for Hunter, there is the accepting of gifts but the then VP. And then there is the taxes not paid on income. Then of course there is the money laundering.


There is no proof of a payment from a foriegn official. Deposits that have a trail associated with it are not bribes. If you are upset about that, then look no further than the actual bribes the Trumps and Kusher took while in office and the $2BILLION Kushner took right after leaving office, for apparently no work.


Republicans aren't actually interested in corruption. They heavily traffic in it after all. Their only agenda is vengeance.
Anonymous
Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


They only decided to be “whistleblowers” after they figured out they were being investigated for leaking.
Anonymous
Because one, the other or both probably leaked.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.
Anonymous
Meanwhile the FBI is more concern about CHS than enforcing the law...

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.


Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.
Anonymous
Of course they would

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the FBI is more concern about CHS than enforcing the law...



If you don't understand how releasing an unverified work product that exposes methods and persons associated with national security, I don't know what to tell you. You seemed to care a lot about Hillary's emails and server.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.


Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.


What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the FBI is more concern about CHS than enforcing the law...



If you don't understand how releasing an unverified work product that exposes methods and persons associated with national security, I don't know what to tell you. You seemed to care a lot about Hillary's emails and server.


Like an unverified dossier about a pee pee tape? You people are insufferable!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.


Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.


What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?


None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Zeigler and Shapley have a bigger issue that was touched on during the hearing, and that is the leaks of the case. they clammed up pretty quickly when those lines of questions came from the dais.


Because they can only comment on what they already testify to in the depostion. Many questions will be answered once these documents are supplied to Ways and Means in the coming days...

No, no they won’t. Don’t you get it? Do you not see how you are being used? There’s never any there there when it comes to Democratic malfeasance. It’s to keep you busy and not focusing on various right wing crimes. Kushner openly took TWO BILLION DOLLARS and you seem not interested. Trump stole above top secret documents, stored them improperly, flashed them around and may have sold some to our enemies and you think it’s all a witch hunt. Trump raped E Jean Carroll and that’s just ducky with you. Donald Trump Jr owns multiple massive weapons and posts videos while he’s high as a kite and you don’t see them. Jim Jordan watched dozens to hundreds of men get raped and that’s fine by you. Marjorie Taylor Green sends revenge porn to minors and you don’t care.

You are being used.


Someone is deranged and confused. A $2 billion "investment" isn't a bribe like the $17 million pay for influence.


What qualifications does Kushner have to manage such assets? What has his "fund" invested in?


None sequitur to the lack of qualifications related to Hunter, however Jared is a third generation family in the real estate business that goes back almost 70 years and billions invested.


which has nothing to do with managing a hedge fund
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: