Elon Musk is now going full MAGA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

[Anonymous]

Did you know that Tesla requires car owners to sign an NDA if they want repairs done to their vehicle?

That is insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

+1

If he’s all for free speech, he should release them from the NDAs he’s enforcing. Why should he get protection from his own crimes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

You can’t understand that Twitter is a corporation and is allowed to make its own rules about speech on its platform?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

People in the US generally have the liberty to engage in contracts as adults. They are also bound by said contracts in a society that has the rule of law. If you believe that either adults should not have the liberty to engage in contracts, or that contracts should not be protected through law, then you are living in the wrong country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

+1

If he’s all for free speech, he should release them from the NDAs he’s enforcing. Why should he get protection from his own crimes?

If a crime was committed, a civil NDA does not protect against criminal prosecution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you know that Tesla requires car owners to sign an NDA if they want repairs done to their vehicle?

That is insane.

Yea, but liberals loved it. As a conservative, it was one more thing that really odd about owning a car that was partially a revokable/nontransferable use license and not ownership.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you know that Tesla requires car owners to sign an NDA if they want repairs done to their vehicle?

That is insane.

Yea, but liberals loved it. As a conservative, it was one more thing that really odd about owning a car that was partially a revokable/nontransferable use license and not ownership.

Citation that “liberals loved it”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

+1

If he’s all for free speech, he should release them from the NDAs he’s enforcing. Why should he get protection from his own crimes?

The First Amendment does not compell speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

+1

If he’s all for free speech, he should release them from the NDAs he’s enforcing. Why should he get protection from his own crimes?

The First Amendment does not compell speech.

So then why are conservatives so eager to compel speech on Twitter, even when such speech violates Twitter’s terms of use?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you know that Tesla requires car owners to sign an NDA if they want repairs done to their vehicle?

That is insane.

I have had multiple repairs on my tesla and have never signed an NDA. There are user groups in which people compare notes about how tesla repairs (mostly, whether repairs were under warranty or not).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

LOL. So true! Hey Muskovites do you agree?

You can’t understand the difference between free speech and confidential corporate information?

DP. LOL, so basically the rich get to buy the speech rights of those who would otherwise spill their dirty secrets. No one is looking for people to share Tesla’s priority art information, what they want is for all of the women who have been victim’s of Musk’s sexual misconduct to be allowed to speak up without Musk siccing his high-priced legal team on them.

+1

If he’s all for free speech, he should release them from the NDAs he’s enforcing. Why should he get protection from his own crimes?

The First Amendment does not compell speech.

No one is talking about compelling speech, we are saying that if Musk values free speech so much, he will release his past accusers from their NDAs so they are free to speak about their experiences without threat from Musk. In other words, Musk should do for those women what he wants Twitter to do for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Elon is contributing more to society than just about anyone in the last 50+ years.

Lol to the wacktivists bent on taking him down.

+1. He's easily the most consequential inventor of our lifetime.

+2. He’s done more to combat climate change than literally everyone who ever posted on this forum combined. That should count for something for true Dems, but sadly politics has become a weird cult where it doesn’t matter what your principles are, it just matters if you have blind allegiance to your specific cult. This goes for Republicans as well, obviously. This country is beyond hope.

He’s a venture capitalist. He didn’t invent the technologies. He bought technology and hired more engineers and inventors.

He founded SpaceX. He is a physicist by education.

He literally is hands on in most engineering decisions in his company. Tesla in another person’s hands would be Chevy Volt or Toyota Prius. Just cause he doesn’t want to be part of your tribe doesn’t mean you have to lie about his qualifications or downplay his influence in EVs.

Well if he wants us to actually buy them he should know better than to join up with the women's rights stripping party of the insurrection. Just no.

He already has gotten people to buy them and a lot of people will still buy them regardless of his politics just like people buy other products without regard for the owners politics. I’m sure almost every old school bourbon and cigarette manufacturer is owned by a right winger yet progressive hipsters still drink Jack Daniels and smoke cigarettes nonetheless. You vastly overrate how much the average person cares about politics. If anything, Elon has broadened his customer base because a lot of culturally conservative Republicans probably didn’t want to drive Teslas before because they thought they were elitists liberal cars. So for every hyperpolitical Dem he loses he picks up a Republican who wants to drive a EV for the first time to “stick it to the libs.”

I feel like you don’t know any hipsters at all.

And I would love to watch Republicans’ inner struggle as they tried desperately to figure out how to “own the libs” better: buying a Tesla or not buying a Tesla. would be

The point was that the average person doesn’t care about an owner of a product’s politics. Chick-fil-A’s business is booming in Montgomery County and bourbon bars are still getting crowds in Williamsburg and the LES despite the politics of a lot of the manufacturers, which obviously can’t be that liberal since they’re all owned by old south money.

None of those owners are as outspoken or visible as Musk is. And none are flirting with mainstreaming hatred on the social media that everyone uses.

Elon’s favorables with Democrats are above water and he is one of the most follower people on Twitter. You vastly overestimate how much you and other hyperpolitical, online liberals matter. Tucker Carlson gets more young Dem viewers than any other cable TV host for example.

What are you smoking?

Nielsen ratings and a Rasmussen poll maybe.

Outside of your Beltway insider bubble Democrats like Elon and watch Tucker more than any other cable news host.

https://nypost.com/2022/04/28/majority-of-americans-approve-of-elon-musks-twitter-buyout-poll/amp/

Women, Republicans, people over 40 and lower income earners were the most enthusiastic demographics about the Musk takeover. But even 57 percent of Democrats polled thought Musk would improve the platform.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tucker-carlson-secures-most-democratic-223803687.html

But recent data from Nielsen MRI Fusion suggests those nightly dispatches may not be necessary: In October, the most recent month for which data is available, Carlson’s 9 p.m. ET program was the top cable news show among Democrats in the advertiser-coveted age range of 25-54.

Only DBs watch the Tuck.

That might be true, but the UMC whites on this board are out of touch with the majority of Dems when it comes to Elon and even Tucker. You are stuck in a bubble and don’t even know it.