
LOL The Virginia Democrats have announced that they categorically deny a role in this as an organization. They however are not putting out statements from their Finance Director or other identified staffers assertively denying that they were there.
Because that would be a lie and if someone sued each of those individuals in court - jail time. |
Is the black guy Victor Strand? |
I have a feeling your post is not going to age well, my friend. |
![]() |
If it comes back that they are Dems, they absolutely deserve criticism. But you are smearing real-life people with no evidence. Just poor attempts at identification. They don’t even look like the same people. |
Little less hysteria and go ask why your state party is putting out statements denying THEIR involvement and quickly assuring they realize the depth of importance the Charlottesville rally had. Notice what they're not doing? Saying the Virginia Young Democrats or McAuliffe campaign were not involved. Shits rolling downhill fast. |
Quick aside, there were a lot of posts in this thread about how McAuliffe was definitely going to win because X poll had him with a big lead. Not seeing much of that now.
How about in the future, just don't pay much attention to polls, and don't report on them as the story? Polls even if accurate, are just a snapshot of a certain time, and things can change over weeks and months. Also, margin of error is generally misreported. A 49-42 lead with a margin of error of 4% is not outside the margin of error, and even if you are outside the margin of error, there is still a 5% chance the poll is wrong, and this whole calculation assumes the poll is a fair sample to begin with. Methodologies used in sampling factory output, is being carried over to social science, and it doesn't work. |
They included “affiliates”, brainiac. |
I don’t remember those posts. Just some MAGAs obsessing over polls. |
Well, now we know where those Clinton swiftboating tactics came from. It wasn't old Bill. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This was a carefully worded denial. Remember Bill Clinton and how he defined “sexual relations” and “it depends on what the definition of “is”, is”? If you don’t, highly recommend you check on the FX Network series on his impeachment. All came down to precise legal wording. Enjoy! |
This has been confirmed. Number 2 and 4 are indeed Colleen and Camden. |
The NBC affiliate in Charlottesville is now reporting on this scandal. |
Confirmed by whom? Bunch of internet nut jobs? ![]() ![]() |