Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's automatically trashy but it's more of a risk.
I've met a couple kids named Summer in the last few years, and also know an adult Summer. None of them, nor their parents, are trashy. It actually reads as like a "rich hippie" name to me. Similar to names like Indigo, Autumn, or Sunday. I could see Winter slotting in with those.
BUT the huge caveat here is that if your family is not a "rich hippie" family, it could come off all wrong. So you have to be self aware here, which is hard, because you have to think about how other people will see your family in the future when your kid is a person in the world. Tricky.
This is why a lot of people just default to more popular, standard names. They aren't as risky. But they can be a bit more boring and feel less specific to you or your kid. That's the trick of naming a baby.
“Popular” and “Standard” are not the same thing and there’s a correlation between popular and trashy names when popular also means trendy, which it often does in the baby name world. Genesis, Paisley, and Everly are all top 100 girl names.
But yes, using a “new” name is more of a risk because there is a bigger chance that it will start trending with the great unwashed and dilute the status and snob appeal of the name.
It really depends if your priority is creativity, uniqueness, “fun” or tradition, ancestry, and perhaps religion/culture.
BTW there are plenty of unique but traditional names. These will depend on your ethnic heritage but for example Anglo, Eastern European, and Latina cultures some examples are things like Magdalena, Pilar, and Jane.
|