Former Prince Andrew arrested

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's his birthday today!

Arresting him on his birthday is a nice touch. I only wish Virginia Giuffre had lived to see this day. Yes, I realize he was not arrested for sex crimes but agree with the others, they get you on what they can get you (e.g., Al Capone and tax evasion). US needs to step up!

There's a silver lining in getting him for a different crime, in that the victims don't have to testify. Some victims may want their day in court, but I suspect most just want him locked up and not to be exposed to a global media circus.

[Anonymous]

Well this is fun!

[Anonymous]

Quite pathetic that white collar crimes get investigated more vigorously than crimes against persons.

[Anonymous]

For all the talk of liberty and justice, we suck at it and remain top of the class pigs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

They didn’t arrest him for sex crimes. He was trading national secrets to foreign governments for payouts. He was also giving insider information.

But, yes, we need to step up our investigation and arrest those involved with the sex trafficking.

And they never will get him for sex crimes. There are no witnesses coming forward with credible accusations that would withstand a legal challenge. Epstein's emails simply don't have the legal weight you wish they did.

[Anonymous]

BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I doubt that but whatever. The royal family has been planning for this. Strip him of titles, kick him out, and let the police have at him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Quite pathetic that white collar crimes get investigated more vigorously than crimes against persons.

Makes sense in our society. Money is worshipped and people are disposible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

I doubt that but whatever. The royal family has been planning for this. Strip him of titles, kick him out, and let the police have at him.

I doubt it too, especially due to logistics.

[Anonymous]

SPILL IT ALL ANDREW!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quite pathetic that white collar crimes get investigated more vigorously than crimes against persons.

Makes sense in our society. Money is worshipped and people are disposible.

If only we could find people guilty on the basis of an email message. Stupid legal system.

[Anonymous]

Funny how all the Europeans with ties to Epstein are facing consequences while Americans with closer ties (Trump, commerce secretary Lutnick) continue on with no issues.

[Anonymous]

What is also happening with his ex wife?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC reports Charles was not informed prior to the arrest.

He had already announced his support of any inquiries and investigations that might occur.

The UK has an evidentiary problem with charging Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor with sex crimes, because his known conduct at this time was not illegal in Britain. They aren’t trying to hide anything, they’re charging what they can, and perhaps in the course of the case, they’ll find more chargeable offenses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

Agreed. I don't know if we'll ever see an Americans arrested. We suck.