One of the better examples of new construction?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not symmetrical.
That bothers me.

Weird--that's precisely what I like about it. Symmetry is so sterile.

[Anonymous]

The outside is not for me at all. The inside is fine, though the mixed casing would bug the shit out of me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Before clicking I knew it would be one of those swooped roofs.

I love those.

[Anonymous]

Also, a $3M house without a foyer is a weird choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, a $3M house without a foyer is a weird choice.

There is a small foyer (picture 4) as well as an outside vestibule.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before clicking I knew it would be one of those swooped roofs.

I love those.

Same. I love the curb appeal. I think the siding should have maybe been a different color other than white, but the swopped roof is fitting for an older neighborhood vibe.

In someplace like Ashburn, obviously not.

[Anonymous]

That house is hideous inside. The outside isn’t awful, but I couldn’t get past the first 10 pictures. It is really awful. Yuck

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple clean lines and no belching garage facing the road really helps with curb appeal.
The all white interior is painfully boring. No paneling. No trim work. Just painted wallboard.

I'd need to add a tacky carport after all the snow we've got if there was no garage at all!

A side facing garage is better. There is an old neighborhoods in Bethesda that prohibited street facing garages in order to protect the real estate value for everyone in the neighborhood. It is lovely to walk and drive around because the properties are beautiful. Most everyone has a side facing garage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not symmetrical.
That bothers me.

Classicist!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cute. Wouldn’t want to back up to low quality low-rise condos for $3m

I know that neighborhood. Where are the low-rise condos?

Ok, low-rise apartments? Not sure what else to call what the home back yard is backing up to.

https://commonwealthcrossing.prospectportal.com/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love it. I’m sure this will be the new trend in new builds. So much better than craftsman.

You’re a fool if you think this is a real Tudor. It’s very much a mix of styles just like most of the Craftsman houses.

I’m no fool. I don’t care what you call it. It just looks better than the same white and black craftsman that keeps getting built. To me it’s the best of both worlds. Practical in the inside and curb appeal on the outside.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not symmetrical.
That bothers me.

Weird--that's precisely what I like about it. Symmetry is so sterile.

Symmetry is about balance and harmony.

[Anonymous]

That price is insane, but it's a cute house and doesn't look overwhelmingly big. I love that.

[Anonymous]

I really like that house. Not in the $3M market, but think that they did a nice job building a rather charming new build. The rounded arches just feel nice. I like it.

It certainly doesn’t look like an almost 6k sq ft house from the front - I’d be curious to see how much of that footage is in the basement vs above ground. Still - very nice.

Lack of a garage is a definite bummer though. There’s enough room in the back to add a good sized shed for bicycles and such, but many people really do want to be able to park their cars under cover.

[Anonymous]

Interior is very tasteful except I don't love the brownish floors. Otherwise I like it.

I will say I don't love the exterior style personally but understand why they chose it there.