The kids who don't care don't take retakes under the current policy (open to anyone who gets under an 80 with the max possible being half of the missed points back), what makes anyone think the new policy would change things from them? The kids retaking will be the ones who are already working hard and doing well. They won't retake to pass a class, they'll retake to turn a 95 into a 97 |
|
Well it still won't be "fair." Even with the 80 percent retake some teachers made special policies as a workaround, for example doing mostly quizzes since those can't be retake , or having papers due but you are allowed and encouraged to hand them in 2 weeks later, as after the 2 week late mark you can give a kid a zero so they make fake deadlines to work around that...
So I can see that some teachers will just find a way. |
My kid was fortunate enough to have a teacher in middle school like that. It taught her to turn everything in on time, regularly screenshot schoology, immediately e-mail teachers requesting a retake after receiving a grade or at the two week mark even if the test wasn't returned. Screenshotting managed to turn a solid B into a solid A when a teacher e-mailed her telling her that he assignment was late and couldn't be retaken when confronted with evidence that the due date was changed. |
That's because they need to keep their bread and butter full-pay families happy and confident in a choice that recognizes the superiority of their offspring. Brown has P/F for lots of classes. Hard to get below a B at Harvard. Etc. |
DP, my daughter has also had retakes in a couple classes. |
Maybe make it an option to take some tests for a grade since half the kids don't seem to even want to learn the material. Instead of dumbing down just offer extra credit for those who care. |
Offering extra credit requires the teacher to work, and they hate that. |
This won’t apply to schools with SBG. There are no retakes. New grades can replace old ones, but not on the same material. Supposedly on the same “skills.” It is a hot mess and everyone knows it, otherwise the new grading policy would be SBG rather than something new. It is unfortunate that kids at Madison and Herndon have a totally separate grading policy. |
Why create more work? Grades should just be grades. You got a B, C- or A, that’s the grade. |
Regardless of the reason (albeit true or not) the point is it happens so the argument about "how will they function in college?" doesn't hold weight. My kid also has retakes in 2 of her college classes. My nephew had to retake the NY bar. In life, there are retakes! |
The point of the class is to learn the material. If the student takes a test, and this shows they don’t know the material, then they go back and learn it and pass the test the next time, their grade should reflect that. |
| I hate this new policy. A cap of 90% would be much better. This is going to be more work for teachers as kids who gets A minuses now and call it a day will try to retest each time to get the max points. It will add stress to those kids too by trying to be perfectionist about it. |
I teach at a school that already has the 100% retake policy. Some teachers have 2/3 or more of their students retaking, with the corresponding increase in grading workload. The other side effect is that between that and the 50% quarterly minimum, overall grades are much higher and mean a lot less than they used to. |
| I didn’t realize any schools already had the 100% retake! It’s a ridiculous policy that means teachers will have more work and grades are less meaningful. |
Ah a snowflake school where everyone graduates with a 3.8 or higher. Just delays the reality of life, unless there is a sufficient trust fund. |