Good lord. There are many more homeless and housing unstable children in DC than UMC system gamers. The policy is written for those children, and written broadly to minimize the administrative burden on those families. If they put threshold eligibility requirements on the policy, then there would have to be a verification process that would serve as a barrier to the most needful families from using the policy as intended. DC doesn't care if a few high SES families also take advantage of the policy, because it is administratively simpler for the schools and families to make it over inclusive. And every higher SES kid that's taking a seat at your Ward 3 school is also a family that stays in DC and pays taxes instead of moving to Maryland. |
| We just moved to Virginia, also Virginia requires that you paid taxes for a certain number of schools to qualify for in state tuition and VA has better colleges. |
Correction: taxes for a certain number of years |
For how many years? |
| The vast majority of students taking advantage of the stay until the terminal grade policy are likely mid and upper elementary school children in all wards who moved a small distance away because of a rent increase, home purchase, family/custody change, etc. and chose to stay enrolled at their established school for continuity/social reasons and not people who are gaming the system to attend Deal/JR. |
I suspect that's not the case. *A lot* of people do it for Deal/JR purposes. But no one has the data to really know. |
Yes I entered the address of the home I own to see if I could lottery into current sixth grade feeder (Deal) if we choose to move into the home we own as opposed to keep renting. |
I think this information should be centralized with myschooldc/osse so there could be data on it. And then it should be programmed in along with the student's ID number so the policy of not getting rights to the destination school can actually be enforced. |
Did you see the metro DC thread on DC government return to office? Who exactly are going to be doing those policy changes, SOPs, IT system modifications, testing, training, and tracking? The same high grade employees who are all now job hunting because after not getting their COLA or performance bonuses this year, are now being told they need to RTO to support the local economy. So no, nobody's going to be spearheading system improvements like these. Not anytime soon under this administration at least. |
And yet this is a perennial question on this board. How long do I have to rent in W3 before my pre4 kid has rights all the way through Whatever ES even when I move back to a neighborhood where I won’t use the IB school? My kids aren’t in W3 schools but it’s pretty obvious that this is what’s going on in this OP. |
So? |
+1. It has been asked and answered, it's just not a satisfactory answer to DCUM. There is no minimum amount of time you have to live IB, as long as you are actually living IB and attending the IB school when the verification is made. That is for administrative simplification and public policy reasons that have nothing to do with UMC system gamers. |
| This can become a widespread problem if there’s an influx of people who catch on to this loophole. |
*wanking motion* |
| As long as you actually live there. |