Another ICE Shooting in Minnesota

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here would fear for their life if an angry, unhinged man approached them with a gun, two loaded magazines and was spitting on them while shouting profanity and insults at them.

Are you suggesting I could shoot and kill someone for spitting on and kicking my car while wearing a concealed handgun?

Yes if you felt fear of safety, and

The car castle doctrine extends legal protections for using force, including deadly force, to one’s vehicle, treating it as an extension of the home. It removes the duty to retreat if attacked while inside a car, often creating a presumption of reasonable fear of death or serious injury.

This doesn't apply if law enforcement identifies themselves outside of the car and orders command

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s shocking to me that people are pretending the video is real. He moves like a video game in the beginning. The in and out of focus thing doesn’t happen with cell phone cameras. It’s fake.

Conservative George Will “Today, it is more than prudent, it is good citizenship to assume that everything ICE says, and everything the administration says in support of its deportation mania, is untrue until proved to be otherwise”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the way it always goes with the Left's martyrs. They start by telling us this entirely fictional biographical story where the martyr was a benevolent and humble servant of the oppressed. Then when it turns out -- as it literally always does -- that he was actually a violent unhinged degenerate weirdo, they will immediately pivot and insist that his character and personal life don't matter actually.

Please specify what makes him a “degenerate.”

Depends on your definition of that word. To me anyone who attacks and spits on law enforcement is a degenerate.

Are you willing to acknowledge J6ers are degenerate then

Left doesn't see the difference in the situation. The J6 was a political protest, they weren't targeting the police.

Democrats used to throw political rallies, you know throw bottles at police or whatever.

The police in those situations know what they are in for their job is crowd control and were equipped you know body shields, chain link fences and what not.

This is like those people that pull the fire alarm then start shooting fire fighters when they arrive.

nah, they were just targeting the House and Senate and the Constitution.

And beating police officers who stood in their way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many people here would fear for their life if an angry, unhinged man approached them with a gun, two loaded magazines and was spitting on them while shouting profanity and insults at them.

Are you suggesting I could shoot and kill someone for spitting on and kicking my car while wearing a concealed handgun?

Yes if you felt fear of safety, and

The car castle doctrine extends legal protections for using force, including deadly force, to one’s vehicle, treating it as an extension of the home. It removes the duty to retreat if attacked while inside a car, often creating a presumption of reasonable fear of death or serious injury.

Lol. That's if someone enters your car and attacks you. Not if someone kicks its taillight and spits on the door.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s shocking to me that people are pretending the video is real. He moves like a video game in the beginning. The in and out of focus thing doesn’t happen with cell phone cameras. It’s fake.

It's shocking to me that people are pretending the video is fake. ANYTHING to advance the narrative that he was just a nice, normal, everyday person. Which is quickly falling apart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the way it always goes with the Left's martyrs. They start by telling us this entirely fictional biographical story where the martyr was a benevolent and humble servant of the oppressed. Then when it turns out -- as it literally always does -- that he was actually a violent unhinged degenerate weirdo, they will immediately pivot and insist that his character and personal life don't matter actually.

Please specify what makes him a “degenerate.”

Depends on your definition of that word. To me anyone who attacks and spits on law enforcement is a degenerate.

Are you willing to acknowledge J6ers are degenerate then

Left doesn't see the difference in the situation. The J6 was a political protest, they weren't targeting the police.

Democrats used to throw political rallies, you know throw bottles at police or whatever.

The police in those situations know what they are in for their job is crowd control and were equipped you know body shields, chain link fences and what not.

This is like those people that pull the fire alarm then start shooting fire fighters when they arrive.

nah, they were just targeting the House and Senate and the Constitution.

And beating police officers who stood in their way.

+1

Those were screams of joy from the Capitol police officer who was being crushed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the way it always goes with the Left's martyrs. They start by telling us this entirely fictional biographical story where the martyr was a benevolent and humble servant of the oppressed. Then when it turns out -- as it literally always does -- that he was actually a violent unhinged degenerate weirdo, they will immediately pivot and insist that his character and personal life don't matter actually.

Please specify what makes him a “degenerate.”

Depends on your definition of that word. To me anyone who attacks and spits on law enforcement is a degenerate.

Are you willing to acknowledge J6ers are degenerate then

Left doesn't see the difference in the situation. The J6 was a political protest, they weren't targeting the police.

Democrats used to throw political rallies, you know throw bottles at police or whatever.

The police in those situations know what they are in for their job is crowd control and were equipped you know body shields, chain link fences and what not.

This is like those people that pull the fire alarm then start shooting fire fighters when they arrive.

Your hypocrisy is showing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s shocking to me that people are pretending the video is real. He moves like a video game in the beginning. The in and out of focus thing doesn’t happen with cell phone cameras. It’s fake.

It's shocking to me that people are pretending the video is fake. ANYTHING to advance the narrative that he was just a nice, normal, everyday person. Which is quickly falling apart.

Why do you think it’s real?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s shocking to me that people are pretending the video is real. He moves like a video game in the beginning. The in and out of focus thing doesn’t happen with cell phone cameras. It’s fake.

It's shocking to me that people are pretending the video is fake. ANYTHING to advance the narrative that he was just a nice, normal, everyday person. Which is quickly falling apart.

What until the details of what was found on his phone comes out!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s shocking to me that people are pretending the video is real. He moves like a video game in the beginning. The in and out of focus thing doesn’t happen with cell phone cameras. It’s fake.

It's shocking to me that people are pretending the video is fake. ANYTHING to advance the narrative that he was just a nice, normal, everyday person. Which is quickly falling apart.

It's shocking that, even if it's real, anyone thinks it affects his being shot in the back days later (other than it possibly being targeted)

[Anonymous]

Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

He probably should have been arrested that day, yes. But that's not related to his being disarmed and shot days later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the officers didn’t even notice his hand gun in the first encounter. He was lucky he wasn’t arrested, shot, or disarmed then. Then he follows ICE around for more? Wild.

Right?! The audacity! Totally deserved getting shot 10 times.

[Anonymous]

[code]https://x.com/mikesington/status/2016845487236927851?s=46[twitter]

[Anonymous]