Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think my favorite part of this whole sage is the foliage queens who noticed the leaves were too green for a winter photo.

Thank you! As a gardener it was one of the first things I called out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM sleuths, never change. This thread is the best and I’m so glad it hasn’t been shut down by Jeff.

Ok, so I have a question about yesterday’s pap photo. Is it possible Kate’s head was just coincidentally turned during the 2-3 seconds the paps had to get a shot? Or is everyone convinced this was very deliberate on Kate’s part?

My 2 cents on what is going on: it seems almost undeniable there are marital issues at play. We’ve been drip fed tidbits about strife in the marriage for about a year now. Obviously there’s the Rose rumors. And them generally looking unhappy in public together. Then the more recent drip drops of a disagreement between the two related to George’s schooling. These leaks mean something. And then, there Will issuing statements on his personal crest (which apparently is unprecedented). And then the weird “personal matter” excuse. Then the random Independent article yesterday reminding us of Rose’s existence. Photogate, obviously.

I have no idea how Kate’s health situation and Kingston’s death relate to any of this (if at all), but yeah, the totality of the circumstances suggests a major marital breakdown. Yes, each thing I’ve listed has a possible alternate explanation, but I’d be shocked if they are not divorcing or on the brink of divorce.

Unlike some PPs, I don’t necessarily think this is DV or ED-related. Either of those would surprise me, but I admit there have been some Easter eggs planted that make the DV theory not *completely* deranged.

Poor Kate. The thought of losing my kids to an institution would wreck me. I don’t care that she “signed up” for it.

It's deliberate. The stunt was planned and they knew the photographer was going to be there. Not to mention it's safe to say it's not the only picture that was taken.

Yesterday there was talk of Kate keeping in the marriage so she have better control of the kids but it's doesn't matter in my opinion. Divorced or not that family will do everything in their power to overstep boundaries when it comes to George.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think my favorite part of this whole sage is the foliage queens who noticed the leaves were too green for a winter photo.

Thank you! As a gardener it was one of the first things I called out.

Spring is coming earlier and earlier, here and there. At least until the Atlantic conveyor belt stops and sends the UK into an ice age.

Are you sure the foliage is inaccurate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly - just glancing over these comments and the hype I can't help wonder does the world want her to kill herself? The sort of pressure she must be under right now - whatever the true circumstances surrounding her health and marriage - gives me anxiety and I don't typically follow the RF. I wish the press and the internet would let this poor woman be.

Someone certainly does.

https://macleans.ca/royalty/meghan-markles-twitter-bot-network-the-whole-thing-is-a-bit-insane/

This is all eventually coming to light. This is a legitimate source, and the truly vituperative coverage began in 2017.

It would make a blockbuster movie plot where Meghan was indeed selected to propagate some one world agenda and her conscious coupling with Harry was facilitated to create a young power couple with ingredients of fame, royalty, globalism, race, beauty, charm, pedigree, charity etc to cultivate a cult. Brexit was a planned move and celebrity billionaires who adopted them are part of the secret group. Things didn't turn out as planned and royal family doesn't fit in that vision so Kate was used to make it happen. A bot army would be an interesting touch. Seriously, that would break Netflix.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCUM sleuths, never change. This thread is the best and I’m so glad it hasn’t been shut down by Jeff.

Ok, so I have a question about yesterday’s pap photo. Is it possible Kate’s head was just coincidentally turned during the 2-3 seconds the paps had to get a shot? Or is everyone convinced this was very deliberate on Kate’s part?

My 2 cents on what is going on: it seems almost undeniable there are marital issues at play. We’ve been drip fed tidbits about strife in the marriage for about a year now. Obviously there’s the Rose rumors. And them generally looking unhappy in public together. Then the more recent drip drops of a disagreement between the two related to George’s schooling. These leaks mean something. And then, there Will issuing statements on his personal crest (which apparently is unprecedented). And then the weird “personal matter” excuse. Then the random Independent article yesterday reminding us of Rose’s existence. Photogate, obviously.

I have no idea how Kate’s health situation and Kingston’s death relate to any of this (if at all), but yeah, the totality of the circumstances suggests a major marital breakdown. Yes, each thing I’ve listed has a possible alternate explanation, but I’d be shocked if they are not divorcing or on the brink of divorce.

Unlike some PPs, I don’t necessarily think this is DV or ED-related. Either of those would surprise me, but I admit there have been some Easter eggs planted that make the DV theory not *completely* deranged.

Poor Kate. The thought of losing my kids to an institution would wreck me. I don’t care that she “signed up” for it.

It's deliberate. The stunt was planned and they knew the photographer was going to be there. Not to mention it's safe to say it's not the only picture that was taken.

Yesterday there was talk of Kate keeping in the marriage so she have better control of the kids but it's doesn't matter in my opinion. Divorced or not that family will do everything in their power to overstep boundaries when it comes to George.

Kate could very well end up with custody in a divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think my favorite part of this whole sage is the foliage queens who noticed the leaves were too green for a winter photo.

Thank you! As a gardener it was one of the first things I called out.

Spring is coming earlier and earlier, here and there. At least until the Atlantic conveyor belt stops and sends the UK into an ice age.

Are you sure the foliage is inaccurate?

Not much is certain. We're all just sleuthing. But certainly that pic was taken in late 2023; and not in 2024 (and by adding "📸 William 2024" to the Mother's Day" pic was the pin that popped the balloon).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly - just glancing over these comments and the hype I can't help wonder does the world want her to kill herself? The sort of pressure she must be under right now - whatever the true circumstances surrounding her health and marriage - gives me anxiety and I don't typically follow the RF. I wish the press and the internet would let this poor woman be.

Someone certainly does.

https://macleans.ca/royalty/meghan-markles-twitter-bot-network-the-whole-thing-is-a-bit-insane/

This is all eventually coming to light. This is a legitimate source, and the truly vituperative coverage began in 2017.

It would make a blockbuster movie plot where Meghan was indeed selected to propagate some one world agenda and her conscious coupling with Harry was facilitated to create a young power couple with ingredients of fame, royalty, globalism, race, beauty, charm, pedigree, charity etc to cultivate a cult. Brexit was a planned move and celebrity billionaires who adopted them are part of the secret group. Things didn't turn out as planned and royal family doesn't fit in that vision so Kate was used to make it happen. A bot army would be an interesting touch. Seriously, that would break Netflix.

This is the issue. This is like a movie to you all. It’s a delicious bit of gossip and you’re watching it with relish!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is gross and classless

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13187479/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-Kate-Photoshop-saga.html

Daily Mail saying that Kate admitted to editing the photo when that’s not what that post said.

It’s a gossip rag. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCUM sleuths, never change. This thread is the best and I’m so glad it hasn’t been shut down by Jeff.

Ok, so I have a question about yesterday’s pap photo. Is it possible Kate’s head was just coincidentally turned during the 2-3 seconds the paps had to get a shot? Or is everyone convinced this was very deliberate on Kate’s part?

My 2 cents on what is going on: it seems almost undeniable there are marital issues at play. We’ve been drip fed tidbits about strife in the marriage for about a year now. Obviously there’s the Rose rumors. And them generally looking unhappy in public together. Then the more recent drip drops of a disagreement between the two related to George’s schooling. These leaks mean something. And then, there Will issuing statements on his personal crest (which apparently is unprecedented). And then the weird “personal matter” excuse. Then the random Independent article yesterday reminding us of Rose’s existence. Photogate, obviously.

I have no idea how Kate’s health situation and Kingston’s death relate to any of this (if at all), but yeah, the totality of the circumstances suggests a major marital breakdown. Yes, each thing I’ve listed has a possible alternate explanation, but I’d be shocked if they are not divorcing or on the brink of divorce.

Unlike some PPs, I don’t necessarily think this is DV or ED-related. Either of those would surprise me, but I admit there have been some Easter eggs planted that make the DV theory not *completely* deranged.

Poor Kate. The thought of losing my kids to an institution would wreck me. I don’t care that she “signed up” for it.

Agreed. Will and Kate were friends before they dated. I don’t care what rights she signed away, she couldn’t have predicted this. I think she went into the marriage in love and expecting the best. I remember when lip readers saw her commenting on how sexy William looked in his uniform. Whatever is happening, if it’s marital discord, I don’t fault her. She’s a human, responding to unique circumstances the best she can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On a more serious note- the press and internet sleuths set out to try and force Kate to share her medical information by coming up with crazier and crazier speculation. While many think this is a joke by going along with it and contributing to it all it’s doing is diminishing another woman’s autonomy for your entertainment. Congrats?

Nah. It’s less about wanting specific medical information— and more about a niggling but genuine concern for her well-being. If instead of doctored and fuzzy photos, Kate had popped onto zoom, surrounded by her kids — or not — and done a date stamped video wishing everyone a happy Mother’s Day, most of us would go back to our usual preoccupations.
As it is, one person’s “diminishing another woman’s autonomy for … entertainment “ is another’s “ I hope she’s ok” coupled with “ but this is really weird”. Your scolding take on all of this is interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles, Diana’s brother, was on the news last night talking about his experience at boarding school in England and how he and his classmates were physically and sexually abused. I don’t think his timing is a coincidence.

💯

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a more serious note- the press and internet sleuths set out to try and force Kate to share her medical information by coming up with crazier and crazier speculation. While many think this is a joke by going along with it and contributing to it all it’s doing is diminishing another woman’s autonomy for your entertainment. Congrats?

Nah. It’s less about wanting specific medical information— and more about a niggling but genuine concern for her well-being. If instead of doctored and fuzzy photos, Kate had popped onto zoom, surrounded by her kids — or not — and done a date stamped video wishing everyone a happy Mother’s Day, most of us would go back to our usual preoccupations.
As it is, one person’s “diminishing another woman’s autonomy for … entertainment “ is another’s “ I hope she’s ok” coupled with “ but this is really weird”. Your scolding take on all of this is interesting.

HA!

If you truly cared about her well being you would stop spreading rumors on social media

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was a colossal PR mistake to not provide more details about Kate’s surgery and health issues. It is completely understandable that she would want privacy but this is all far worse IMHO (and that information will come out eventually anyway). Even if they had simply said “surgery due to complications from Crohn’s disease etc etc, is non life threatening blah blah”. The whole thing was mismanaged from the start.

Agreed. They don’t owe us any details whatsoever but the Internet does tend to create details if no details are given. A similar thing was done with Jamie Foxx last year. Conspiracies ranged from death, amputation , comatose, Jamie being shot dead by mistake during a scene of his movie, and all other types of insane stories amid no detail.

The Information Age/Internet era hates having no information and will create their own to fill in the gaps.

In this particular case, the Palace made a huge error photoshopping pics. Now people who weren’t paying attention to what Kate was up to are on Kate watch

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think my favorite part of this whole sage is the foliage queens who noticed the leaves were too green for a winter photo.

Thank you! As a gardener it was one of the first things I called out.

Spring is coming earlier and earlier, here and there. At least until the Atlantic conveyor belt stops and sends the UK into an ice age.

Are you sure the foliage is inaccurate?

Not much is certain. We're all just sleuthing. But certainly that pic was taken in late 2023; and not in 2024 (and by adding "📸 William 2024" to the Mother's Day" pic was the pin that popped the balloon).

Yes, strange. How is this being "explained"????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Charles, Diana’s brother, was on the news last night talking about his experience at boarding school in England and how he and his classmates were physically and sexually abused. I don’t think his timing is a coincidence.

He's on a book tour, the timing of which would have been worked out well before photogate.

Y'all are nuts.