Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

No, sorry. That's still gross. He could have "courted" someone of an adult age.

Or more to the point - Moore could have grabbed the ass of someone who’d given consent. Same with placing other people’s hands in his erect Penso. Consent makes all the difference in the world.

[Anonymous]

Et tu, Ivanka? Et tu?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/11/15/politics/ivanka-trump-roy-moore/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

No, sorry. That's still gross. He could have "courted" someone of an adult age.

Or more to the point - Moore could have grabbed the ass of someone who’d given consent. Same with placing other people’s hands in his erect Penso. Consent makes all the difference in the world.

A 14YO can’t consent you POS perv.

[Anonymous]

Pedophile?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

[Anonymous]

As predicted much, much earlier in this thread, more are stepping forward. Too bad, so sad for all the perv apologists here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In 1920 the ages of consent rose to 16-18 in the United States. Any parent since then that supported and conspired to have their child, still in puberty, date men 28 years old should have gone to jail and lost parental rights.

Sounds like some really backwards family.

I agree with you that is how it should be, but we as a nation have some serious work to do in that regard. New Hampshire is the most recent one I can think of, but thousands of girls are religiously abused and thrown into marriages that would make the rest of us gag. http://nhpr.org/post/minimum-age-marriage-nh-remains-13-women-14-men#stream/0

Still doesn't excuse Moore's pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So...that’s your takeaway from these new accusations? That the Washington Post is a terrific conspirator and Roy Moore wasn’t sexually assaulting vulnerable women - and teenagers - repeatedly through the years?

In your opinion, is he a "pedophile" or not?

Anyone?

Let me see, my parents started courting back then. My mother was 15, my father 28. They married when she was 26, right. Score he left fir war, he was in the military. Today they are married over 60 years and thankfully still healthy and happy. Back then this age difference wasn't a big deal. So I'll wait and give this man the same benefit of a doubt I would provide you under these circumstances. It is his word against theirs, I'd like to have a little more than the words of these accusers before I destroy a persons life. I am a woman and I have witnessed lots of crap from women over the years so I am skeptical to say the least. Why now? There were so many opportunities to come forward. Why now?

Good points and questions to ponder.
Looking forward to the responses.

OH! OH! ME! ME! BACK HERE! IN THE BACK! I HAVE A RESPONSE!

Her dad is f-ing gross. This was not, and was never okay. Either way, in the 70s this was illegal. Either way, Roy Moore attempted rape and assault on many of these women which is and was illegal.

The man was banned from a mall. In the 70s.

My father is not gross. I will not use your language. Those were the times and there were plenty of work men who married before the lives of their lives went off to war. We have to stop placing our modern day views on other times. Sure, when you know better, you d better, but this was that time. You can sit back down now and learn rather than judging. Your welcome. Put your hand down.

Lots of holes to in your post. Your father is a very sick man. I do judge and if he liked young girls there is a good chance he may molested them after he was married. You act like marriage is some sort of protection against illegal, immoral acts. It is not. but whatever I call troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

True. Just the facts. Pedophile or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As predicted much, much earlier in this thread, more are stepping forward. Too bad, so sad for all the perv apologists here.

Normal people would back down, but his staunchest defenders are really doubling down on supporting a child sex assaulter. This is the hill the GOP faithful want to die on. Molesting teens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

True. Just the facts. Pedophile or not?

Oh my god, you moron. It's been answered two dozen times. YES HE'S A PEDOPHILE. I don't care if they had pubic hair or not or wherever you pedophile freaks like to draw the lines to make yourselves feel better about your perversions, but most of us are repulsed by the idea of assaulting teens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As predicted much, much earlier in this thread, more are stepping forward. Too bad, so sad for all the perv apologists here.

Normal people would back down, but his staunchest defenders are really doubling down on supporting a child sex assaulter. This is the hill the GOP faithful want to die on. Molesting teens.

I knew Alabama was very conservative but I had no idea that they were such a bunch of Neanderthals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As predicted much, much earlier in this thread, more are stepping forward. Too bad, so sad for all the perv apologists here.

Normal people would back down, but his staunchest defenders are really doubling down on supporting a child sex assaulter. This is the hill the GOP faithful want to die on. Molesting teens.

Party over pedophilia. Your new GOP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

True. Just the facts. Pedophile or not?

Oh my god, you moron. It's been answered two dozen times. YES HE'S A PEDOPHILE. I don't care if they had pubic hair or not or wherever you pedophile freaks like to draw the lines to make yourselves feel better about your perversions, but most of us are repulsed by the idea of assaulting teens.

His most recent assault was 25 years ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pedophile?

Sexual assault and stalking aren't a game of semantics.

True. Just the facts. Pedophile or not?

Oh my god, you moron. It's been answered two dozen times. YES HE'S A PEDOPHILE. I don't care if they had pubic hair or not or wherever you pedophile freaks like to draw the lines to make yourselves feel better about your perversions, but most of us are repulsed by the idea of assaulting teens.

His most recent assault was 25 years ago?

That line of reasoning is going to look real dumb when something more recent comes out. I'm sure Bernie Bernstein's phone is ringing off the hook. Four new accusers just today.