Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This proves you can't make everyone happy.
The kids are happy they won't have to risk their lives on a bus and icy roads.
Again, hug your children. Spend this time with them. You won't live forever. And for some of you, you will outlive your child.
This is a gift to you both.
I spend enough time with my kids thank you very much. We plan time! I need my kid who struggles with academics to learn so he will graduate and not live with me forever.
If you want productive citizens get these kids to school!
I’m sorry not all streets are plowed. I don’t think that the kids should stay home because a few have piles of snow. Ugh! If you think it is unsafe and are worried keep them home. You want to punish all the kids for your kids safety. Let me be the judge.
Our neighborhood and school is fine.
It’s been four days. Please get a life.
And it isn’t about “your neighborhood and school.” It’s a large district. FFS.
+1
While DCUM is hardly broadly representative, I am quite surprised at the large number of parents so eager to get their kids out of the house that safety is a secondary concern. As has been said over and over, FCPS has 13 built-in snow days (elementary has 10 this year). We've used four in the name of safety. So, there will be four fewer joke days at the end of the school year where kids have "study hall" (a/k/a play on your FCPS-provided device) or watch a movie and throw spitballs. If you have child care issues, that is not FCPS's job to solve. Public schools exist to provide education -- not babysit your kids -- and there is enough fluff built in that these four days make no difference in achieving that aim. For once, Reid is actually putting the kids -- all the kids -- first. Get your priorities straight. You're just going to have to suffer through having your kids at home.
Don’t take this the wrong way, but you’re missing the point. It’s not about not wanting kids at home. There’s too many figurative snowflakes who are worried about everything, including their own shadows, so “safety” becomes this all-encompassing excuse for everything. Do we need to go back to 2020? As predicted, the impacts of that disaster (the one we created, not the virus) are still being felt. Of course, we were told “safety”. There’s a lot of people now screaming “safety”, and we don’t love our kids because we want them not to miss weeks and weeks of school at a time, when we know there are learning loss impacts. We also know that those of us who are Gen X, the generation who grew up being sent to school in 50 inches of snow. We threw chains on the buses and made it happen. Today, we cancel for cold, wind, rain. So all this fear mongering doesn’t work. We lived it (keyword lived). We’re clearly heading in the wrong direction. I’m sorry you can’t see that and have to strike back with “you don’t love your children” or some version that implies that. Obviously we do, but want to prepare our kids to be more than our precious little snowflakes. Or we can take the other angle of those less affluent parents who have to work and can’t afford childcare. The ones people always say they want to help at election time because they’re the party that cares about the less fortunate, but in principle only care about if they don’t inconvenience what they want.