Bennifer Revisited

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

Because he wouldn’t impregnate her. She thought she bagged an 18 year meal ticket but he was just using her for quarantine sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

Are you 14? FFS, the privates, as you put it, can absolutely vary. And my guess is that AA's privates have been far more traveled that JLo's who, despite her terrible choice in men, seems to have a preference for monogamy. And no, not shaming AA, simply pointing out that vaginal "youth" isn't dictated by age.

If I were 14 I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. How old are YOU?

I'm old enough not to reduce women's sexuality and attractiveness to age. The PP sounds really immature and misogynistic. Normal, well adjusted adults recognize that women aren't disposable after a certain age or that their "privates" are all that counts, as PP also suggested.

You idiot. I'm a 52 year old woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

It's called a VAGINA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

Are you 14? FFS, the privates, as you put it, can absolutely vary. And my guess is that AA's privates have been far more traveled that JLo's who, despite her terrible choice in men, seems to have a preference for monogamy. And no, not shaming AA, simply pointing out that vaginal "youth" isn't dictated by age.

If I were 14 I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. How old are YOU?

I'm old enough not to reduce women's sexuality and attractiveness to age. The PP sounds really immature and misogynistic. Normal, well adjusted adults recognize that women aren't disposable after a certain age or that their "privates" are all that counts, as PP also suggested.

You idiot. I'm a 52 year old woman.

Well, clearly you haven’t accumulated much wisdom for all those years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

Because he wouldn’t impregnate her. She thought she bagged an 18 year meal ticket but he was just using her for quarantine sex.

Oh I don’t follow this that closely. Makes sense. But then aren’t they both each other’s rebound? Both broken-hearted, not a good start. Could work but give the track record I’m not sure.

[Anonymous]

So you break up with your fiancé because you've come to the conclusion that you can't trust them, and you rebound with an alcoholic ex who's cheated on every partner he's ever had. Including you. Makes SO much sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

Are you 14? FFS, the privates, as you put it, can absolutely vary. And my guess is that AA's privates have been far more traveled that JLo's who, despite her terrible choice in men, seems to have a preference for monogamy. And no, not shaming AA, simply pointing out that vaginal "youth" isn't dictated by age.

If I were 14 I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. How old are YOU?

I'm old enough not to reduce women's sexuality and attractiveness to age. The PP sounds really immature and misogynistic. Normal, well adjusted adults recognize that women aren't disposable after a certain age or that their "privates" are all that counts, as PP also suggested.

You idiot. I'm a 52 year old woman.

Well, clearly you haven’t accumulated much wisdom for all those years.

I am not in need of your approval. What astonishes me is how ignorant young women are about the aging process. You can look like JLo on the outside, but ALL of your organs, your uterus, your bowels, your liver, your heart are going to age on the inside. They don't work as well after 45 as when you're 35 and you can start to tell. It doesn't matter how much money you have or how organic your food, or how many trainers are keeping your ass tight, they are not keeping your insides the same, your hormone levels are dropping, your libido is dropping. Honestly a health class wouldn't go amiss here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So you break up with your fiancé because you've come to the conclusion that you can't trust them, and you rebound with an alcoholic ex who's cheated on every partner he's ever had. Including you. Makes SO much sense.

PR benefits both plus sticking it to Arod. Won't last.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

Are you 14? FFS, the privates, as you put it, can absolutely vary. And my guess is that AA's privates have been far more traveled that JLo's who, despite her terrible choice in men, seems to have a preference for monogamy. And no, not shaming AA, simply pointing out that vaginal "youth" isn't dictated by age.

If I were 14 I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. How old are YOU?

I'm old enough not to reduce women's sexuality and attractiveness to age. The PP sounds really immature and misogynistic. Normal, well adjusted adults recognize that women aren't disposable after a certain age or that their "privates" are all that counts, as PP also suggested.

You idiot. I'm a 52 year old woman.

Well, clearly you haven’t accumulated much wisdom for all those years.

I am not in need of your approval. What astonishes me is how ignorant young women are about the aging process. You can look like JLo on the outside, but ALL of your organs, your uterus, your bowels, your liver, your heart are going to age on the inside. They don't work as well after 45 as when you're 35 and you can start to tell. It doesn't matter how much money you have or how organic your food, or how many trainers are keeping your ass tight, they are not keeping your insides the same, your hormone levels are dropping, your libido is dropping. Honestly a health class wouldn't go amiss here.

Speak for yourself!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

Are you 14? FFS, the privates, as you put it, can absolutely vary. And my guess is that AA's privates have been far more traveled that JLo's who, despite her terrible choice in men, seems to have a preference for monogamy. And no, not shaming AA, simply pointing out that vaginal "youth" isn't dictated by age.

If I were 14 I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. How old are YOU?

I'm old enough not to reduce women's sexuality and attractiveness to age. The PP sounds really immature and misogynistic. Normal, well adjusted adults recognize that women aren't disposable after a certain age or that their "privates" are all that counts, as PP also suggested.

You idiot. I'm a 52 year old woman.

Well, clearly you haven’t accumulated much wisdom for all those years.

I am not in need of your approval. What astonishes me is how ignorant young women are about the aging process. You can look like JLo on the outside, but ALL of your organs, your uterus, your bowels, your liver, your heart are going to age on the inside. They don't work as well after 45 as when you're 35 and you can start to tell. It doesn't matter how much money you have or how organic your food, or how many trainers are keeping your ass tight, they are not keeping your insides the same, your hormone levels are dropping, your libido is dropping. Honestly a health class wouldn't go amiss here.

It's called a VAGINA. VAGINA VAGINA VAGINA. Why do you refuse to say that word but you're okay with "ass"?

[Anonymous]

I don't know, at 46, I am told I'm still nice and tight. The two c-sections may have helped with that.

[Anonymous]

You people are just sad.

Acting as if relationship decisions are based upon vaginas.

Think about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I though he was dating a 20 year old for a few months or a year or two already. Seems fishy that he would drop that girl for JLO?

Ana de Armas? She’s 33 and she’s the one that left him. He was pretty torn up about it too.

JLO is WAY HOTTER than she is. JLO's face is just so pretty, and she has an unbelievable body even in her 50's. I never understood the Appeal of AA. Just not even halfway attractive to me.

AA's privates are going to be 33 yrs old and Jlo's privates are going to be 51. That's where it counts.

Are you 14? FFS, the privates, as you put it, can absolutely vary. And my guess is that AA's privates have been far more traveled that JLo's who, despite her terrible choice in men, seems to have a preference for monogamy. And no, not shaming AA, simply pointing out that vaginal "youth" isn't dictated by age.

If I were 14 I wouldn’t know what I was talking about. How old are YOU?

I'm old enough not to reduce women's sexuality and attractiveness to age. The PP sounds really immature and misogynistic. Normal, well adjusted adults recognize that women aren't disposable after a certain age or that their "privates" are all that counts, as PP also suggested.

You idiot. I'm a 52 year old woman.

Well, clearly you haven’t accumulated much wisdom for all those years.

I am not in need of your approval. What astonishes me is how ignorant young women are about the aging process. You can look like JLo on the outside, but ALL of your organs, your uterus, your bowels, your liver, your heart are going to age on the inside. They don't work as well after 45 as when you're 35 and you can start to tell. It doesn't matter how much money you have or how organic your food, or how many trainers are keeping your ass tight, they are not keeping your insides the same, your hormone levels are dropping, your libido is dropping. Honestly a health class wouldn't go amiss here.

It's called a VAGINA. VAGINA VAGINA VAGINA. Why do you refuse to say that word but you're okay with "ass"?

I think liver and heart also count as "insides"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So you break up with your fiancé because you've come to the conclusion that you can't trust them, and you rebound with an alcoholic ex who's cheated on every partner he's ever had. Including you. Makes SO much sense.

PR benefits both plus sticking it to Arod. Won't last.

Yup.

[Anonymous]

She's retaliating but her behavior is ridiculous. For four years we were subjected to hearing about how special this love was and only a few weeks later later she is entangled again with her ex, an addict with his own erratic history. She lives in her own world and she is obviously impulsive and lacking in self awareness... so tired of her and her pr machine too. Her narcissism snd grandiosity is on full display. I wish she would get help but she's apparently in love with herself, which is obvious if you ever listen carefully to what she says. She stands out as deeply narcissistic in an industry saturated by narcissists. That really says something.