Maybe on occasion, Andrew may dabble in same-sex but his reputation is for young girls, possibly too young. |
I just think it’s weird that there’s so much space between everyone. |
|
No bearing. I have heard the younger women thing but I actually think Andrew and Fergie are very close.
Don't understand why Andrew doesn't stand next to Eugenia in the family photo and then Fergie and then Beatrice. |
| Meant no bearding. |
| The arrangement of the photo makes it appear that neither Eugenie nor Beatrice have any family. Odd. |
Perhaps because if by doing so the queen would no longer be the central focus? I think they should’ve scooted the queen and Eugenie closer, then snuck in Andrew behind and slightly to the right of the queen. |
I don’t think he let her have affairs. |
NP. And that’s also the reason the Queen was not Princess Royal when she would’ve been eligible for it. The title was held by her aunt Princess Mary, who was the only daughter of King George V. |
| By the time the Princess Elizabeth was eligible to be "Princess Royal," she would have been heir to the throne. |
This was my favorite part of the wedding. The lack of veil and open back to show off the childhood scar was a tribute to the health staff who helped her, and such a message to young girls about scars and beauty. |
Andrew was a known skirt chaser when he was younger. He was nicknamed "Randy Andy" back in the day. |
Wonder if he was one of the abused: https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/how-a-royal-gift-exposed-sexual-abuse-at-an-elite-canadian-school/ |
| Who is she? |
Why all the gaps between the people on the right? The photographer sucked. |
It looks like the photographer didn’t want anyone standing directly behind the queen or Phillip, which threw the entire composition off. |