Michael Cohen and related issues Master Thread

Anonymous
Imagine Hannity's reaction if Obama's 'mistress' attorney was also Maddow's attorney and she was reporting on the FBI sweep of the attorney's office.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Media Matters tweeted out a list of Hannity's advertisers. I have no idea why. The responses were pretty brutal (negative toward Media Matters).
If they think a boycott is in order, they should take note of how the Ingraham boycott has gone (her viewership is up something like 20%).


Can you imagine what the outpouring of support would be like if Media Matters attacks Hannity so soon after Ingraham? My God - can’t this umbrella of organizations see the more they get involved, the further to the right a country goes? My God. How many loses does it take for them to understand the people do not want a progressive overlord.


Yep. And, the student-turned-activist David Hogg tweeted today to stay tuned for his next announced boycott. So, on Twitter, #DavidHoggsNextBoycott was trending most of the day. It has gotten ridiculous.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Media Matters tweeted out a list of Hannity's advertisers. I have no idea why. The responses were pretty brutal (negative toward Media Matters).
If they think a boycott is in order, they should take note of how the Ingraham boycott has gone (her viewership is up something like 20%).


Can you imagine what the outpouring of support would be like if Media Matters attacks Hannity so soon after Ingraham? My God - can’t this umbrella of organizations see the more they get involved, the further to the right a country goes? My God. How many loses does it take for them to understand the people do not want a progressive overlord.


It's interesting that the special elections have been skewing more towards the left than would have otherwise been anticipated, though.

That's an odd way for voters to show they are going further right.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t trump supporters just give up? The whole administration is corrupt.


Maybe they r surrogates? 2 much at stake if the truth cones out. Karma gonna b a real bitch for these a holes
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Imagine Hannity's reaction if Obama's 'mistress' attorney was also Maddow's attorney and she was reporting on the FBI sweep of the attorney's office.



+1 MSNBC would have suspended Maddow. Fox’s response: “we see other networks are covering this story...we’ll get back to you after we call hannity.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t trump supporters just give up? The whole administration is corrupt.


Maybe they r surrogates? 2 much at stake if the truth cones out. Karma gonna b a real bitch for these a holes


Are you really that lazy that you can’t spell out 3-letter words? Or, even 2-letter words for that matter.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is this why Hannity needed Cohen?
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/despite-reports-fmr-fox-guest-now-claims-she-was-never-sexually-harassed-by-sean-hannity-2/amp/


That is an old story. The left TRIED to boycott because of it, but they failed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t trump supporters just give up? The whole administration is corrupt.


That is what you have been pushing for since Jan, 2017. Consider us the #persistence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t trump supporters just give up? The whole administration is corrupt.


That is what you have been pushing for since Jan, 2017. Consider us the #persistence.


Hey if you want to spend your $ on campaign donations for legal bills to prop up this kleptocracy, go for it. Your donors are old and meanwhile a new generation of Americans who value competence and honesty in Government is souring on the GOP.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why don’t trump supporters just give up? The whole administration is corrupt.


That is what you have been pushing for since Jan, 2017. Consider us the #persistence.


So for some reason, you are proud to allow Trump to personally pillage the US treasury for millions of dollars and for Jared Kushner to play mob boss with Qatar and UAE while Ivanka benefits personally from Chinese trademarks?

Why do you think this is justifiable?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Media Matters tweeted out a list of Hannity's advertisers. I have no idea why. The responses were pretty brutal (negative toward Media Matters).
If they think a boycott is in order, they should take note of how the Ingraham boycott has gone (her viewership is up something like 20%).


Can you imagine what the outpouring of support would be like if Media Matters attacks Hannity so soon after Ingraham? My God - can’t this umbrella of organizations see the more they get involved, the further to the right a country goes? My God. How many loses does it take for them to understand the people do not want a progressive overlord.


What time is O'Reilly on now? I am having trouble finding his show.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Media Matters tweeted out a list of Hannity's advertisers. I have no idea why. The responses were pretty brutal (negative toward Media Matters).
If they think a boycott is in order, they should take note of how the Ingraham boycott has gone (her viewership is up something like 20%).


Can you imagine what the outpouring of support would be like if Media Matters attacks Hannity so soon after Ingraham? My God - can’t this umbrella of organizations see the more they get involved, the further to the right a country goes? My God. How many loses does it take for them to understand the people do not want a progressive overlord.


It's interesting that the special elections have been skewing more towards the left than would have otherwise been anticipated, though.

That's an odd way for voters to show they are going further right.


You win a few races and get cocky. Good.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Media Matters tweeted out a list of Hannity's advertisers. I have no idea why. The responses were pretty brutal (negative toward Media Matters).
If they think a boycott is in order, they should take note of how the Ingraham boycott has gone (her viewership is up something like 20%).


Can you imagine what the outpouring of support would be like if Media Matters attacks Hannity so soon after Ingraham? My God - can’t this umbrella of organizations see the more they get involved, the further to the right a country goes? My God. How many loses does it take for them to understand the people do not want a progressive overlord.


What time is O'Reilly on now? I am having trouble finding his show.


It is on right after Hillary’s presser.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Media Matters tweeted out a list of Hannity's advertisers. I have no idea why. The responses were pretty brutal (negative toward Media Matters).
If they think a boycott is in order, they should take note of how the Ingraham boycott has gone (her viewership is up something like 20%).


Can you imagine what the outpouring of support would be like if Media Matters attacks Hannity so soon after Ingraham? My God - can’t this umbrella of organizations see the more they get involved, the further to the right a country goes? My God. How many loses does it take for them to understand the people do not want a progressive overlord.


What time is O'Reilly on now? I am having trouble finding his show.


+1. Hannity is going down along with Trump. It’s only a matter of time. Rupert Murdoch is aging and his sons are far more moderate.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: