Rolex

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy your tacky watch any deadbeat with a $20K max credit card can buy.

With all your new money you can’t walk into a Rolex authorized dealer out of the blue and buy a:

Stainless steel Rolex Submariner
Stainless steel Rolex Submariner Date
Stainless Steel Rolex GMT-Master II Batman
Stainless Steel Rolex GMT-Master II Batgirl
Stainless Steel Rolex GMT-Master II Bruce Wayne
Stainless Steel Rolex GMT-Master II Sprite
Stainless Steel Datejust 41mm Fluted Bezel Wimbledon
Stainless Steel Datejust 41mm Fluted Bezel Blue Dial
Stainless Steel Datejust 41mm Fluted Bezel Mint Green Dial
Etc., etc., etc.

Wait. Hold the phone. Did you actually type that all out?? Please tell me it's a copy and paste. But even then... I am intrigued by the level of commitment

It was from memory and I type very quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confident vetted members of a nine figure up-front private country club don't need a gaudy watch to show they are a person of status and means.

There isn’t a “nine figure” initiation and dues country club in the world. There’s only one club in the U.S. with a $1,000,000 fee.

Anonymous wrote:Flashing a gaudy watch in 2026 is Third World coded. Far more likely to be some sort of low rung scammer or dope peddler than an educated and successful person of status and means.

President Obama, President Biden, Warren Buffet, Larry Ellison, Jim Walton, David Beckham, Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Garner, etc., etc., etc., would beg to differ.

A Rolex is an affordable luxury watch, though in this economy a $10,000+ watch isn’t that affordable anymore. They’re also an aspirational watch for the middle class.

Over the last 100+ years Rolex has refined their watches employing subtle changes that don’t disrupt the model’s aesthetic. It’s why their watches are so iconic. They don’t chase trends. They offer accurate, capable, reliable, recognizable watches that communicate the wearer has enjoyed a measure of success. There’s a reason they sell the most watches in the world by a long shot.

you again? Is this AI??
You really commit to your lists!

etc., etc., etc.

I don’t use AI. I know a lot about watches.

[Anonymous]

The difference between movie and entrepreneur money, and television money.

https://www.esquire.com/uk/watches/a71163281/rolex-daytonas-watches-ryan-reynolds-and-rob-mcelhenney/

[Anonymous]

Meh, I like my submariner... always wanted one, so I got one. I also like Omega, but that's because of Bond - have one too. I wear what I like, just like I drive what I like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meh, I like my submariner... always wanted one, so I got one. I also like Omega, but that's because of Bond - have one too. I wear what I like, just like I drive what I like.

You are a fool. According to DCUM rules, you need to drive and wear the cheapest things you can find to prove that you have money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rolex is for amateurs. The really rich are buying Richard Mills timepieces.

agree, rolex are kind of tacky, they are very shiny. and they aren't for accuracy- quartz watches all keep better time- its a hobby. I dont think they signal any sort of refinement though, vintage patek or any other watch you get from your grandparents from before the 1940s is an actual flex.

Well, if money is no object, I’d purchase a watch by Roger W Smith. Don’t know him? Look up George Daniels. As that’s unlikely, I just wear my father’s watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meh, I like my submariner... always wanted one, so I got one. I also like Omega, but that's because of Bond - have one too. I wear what I like, just like I drive what I like.

I never said Rolex is the be-all and end-all. I’ve been reacting to those posters trying to diminish their overall history, quality and success.

I like my IWC, JLC, Omega, Nomos, and Zenith, but I love the fully tegimented Sinn on my wrist that is water resistant to 5000M. I don’t even own a Rolex currently, but I have, and I will again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rolex is for amateurs. The really rich are buying Richard Mills timepieces.

agree, rolex are kind of tacky, they are very shiny. and they aren't for accuracy- quartz watches all keep better time- its a hobby. I dont think they signal any sort of refinement though, vintage patek or any other watch you get from your grandparents from before the 1940s is an actual flex.

Well, if money is no object, I’d purchase a watch by Roger W Smith. Don’t know him? Look up George Daniels. As that’s unlikely, I just wear my father’s watch.

But money is an object for 99% of people. Rolex is likely the highest level of luxury watches they can strive for. It’s why it’s perhaps the most recognized luxury brand in the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meh, I like my submariner... always wanted one, so I got one. I also like Omega, but that's because of Bond - have one too. I wear what I like, just like I drive what I like.

You are a fool. According to DCUM rules, you need to drive and wear the cheapest things you can find to prove that you have money.

But definitely send Bryce and Zoe to Sidwell.