Take their kids away. These parents clearly love feeling āsmartā more than they love their children. Their kids are better off in foster care where they at least can benefit from 1960s era medicine. |
Inform yourself. You can acquire it from casual transmission - a nanny who cut a finger and touched a toy can result in a kid dying from liver cancer. But you do you. The more you idiots stop protecting your kids, the more likely it is they die before they can breed another generation of idiots. Thanks for doing your part to ensure a stronger, more intelligent and more pro-social gene pool. |
What about all the people who donāt have autism and yet managed to get all the vaccines? |
Yes, more people should know about the risks of living to adulthood. For some people, their brains go soft, and not being exposed to any real medical adversity where they needed to place their trust in someone smarter to ensure their own survival, they start buying into conspiracy theories and accepting without question everything some troll with no credentials posts on Instagram. No to vaccines, yes to made in China snake oil! Chemo no, coffee colonics yes! Some go so far as to expose their own children to needless suffering at enormous cost to society so they can feel smart and in control. And when the inevitable happens, they are pointing the finger everywhere but themselves. Yes, more people should know about the risks of idiots living long enough to breed. Vaccines have saved us from natural selection. |
|
This, what we need is a stupid vaccine, Iām so sick of morons being able to find each other and offered a platform to voice their moronic opinions. Itās not fair that the rest of the world has to suffer the injustices of stupidity. And yes Iām calling that poster and the social media poster stupid. Because that is what they are. Stupid. |
Because the adults were (and still are) infecting the children. And crying boo hoo when medical science canāt save their kids from their own consistently poor decision making. |
Sacrifice them to what, exactly? It feels very bad for me to say it, but maybe you need to experience what it is like being the parent of an immune compromised child. Perhaps a leukemia. Just so you can experience how little some people care about the thing that matters most in the world to you. |
To be fair, parents should require testing and/or vaccines from nannies and other long term care givers. |
Rich parents will have no problem with this. Everyone else will get what they get, which will increasingly consist of unvaccinated caregivers who do not have affordable and reliable access to healthcare. We are a third world nation when it comes to healthcare for 70%+ of Americans. Itās time we started acting like it. |
Thereās a 6% error rate in the testing. |
How is this even possible? They would be observing her in a trial. Are you saying her injury wasn't reported by her parents? Or, the timing was off, and they didn't think it was because of the vaccine? In every study I've read, they included data that shows that not everyone responded to the treatment/drug. |
The odds are better that the parents are confusing correlation with causation. Just look at how many people are blaming childhood vaccines for causing autism in their kids, when itās clear to anyone with eyes the family has autism in the genes. A lot of autoimmune conditions start to rear their heads in adolescence. |
State health departments should offer testing at a low cost, if they don't already. Why should food handlers have higher health screening requirements than people working directly with small children. Look, I get my son vaccinated. His dad acquired Hep C (not B) when he was a young boy going through medical issues. I get it. But, Americans are allowed to question public health policy, especially when it's a blanket policy and targeted interventions would drive the rate lower, which in 1991 for non-Asian children was .024% and 2.58% for Asian children born in the US. This minor change in recommendation should not be producing this reaction. I am alarmed by the anti-vaxxers, but I'm also becoming alarmed by the individuals who rail against anything that breaks with the establishment. Both groups seem to be composed of non-critical thinkers. |
I think the frustration is that there was no reason for this change. It was not that there was some real safety issue. Furthermore, targeted interventions were not successful in the US previously. This change will result in a small increase in cases, small because we still recommend vaccination at two months instead of birth. However, there still was no good reason to change policy and cause what will inevitably be a slight increase in cases and impacted children. Again, if there was a real safety issue, fine. There was not. |