Tulsi Gabbard - Director of National Intelligence

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.


It was somewhat shocking (well, not really) that Biden didn't save any positions in his administration for Gabbard. She was very well suited for some of them, and it would have been a great way to show that the Democratic Party was above empowering the petty smears coming out of the sleaze & corruption wing of the party.



Maybe it has something to do with why someone on Russian TV called her “our girlfriend”?


They don’t literally mean girlfriend as in lover. They just mean a female friend to Russia. Contrary to Washington propaganda, Russians are excited to form a friendship and a bond with the US/Americans. Most leaders are. Washington wants another Cold War.



Hahahahahahhaha


It’s quite embarrassing Democrats are war hawks and embrace neocon policies now. Trump wants to clean up Big Pharma and the Pentagon and our intelligence agencies and Democrats are mad about that? RFK and Tulsi would’ve been dream picks for a progressive 10 years ago


“Clean up”? No. He has been very clear that he wants to destroy everything. And then there is his life history of finding ways to personally profit off of everything.

Please read How Democracies Die.



Democrats weaponized the DOJ to go after their political enemies and put Tulsi Gabbard on a terror watch list. She was a democrat senator from Hawaii, previously, but she dared to speak out against Biden and the DNC.

They proposed a "Disinformation Governance Board" by the government. Representative Bill Pascrell (D-New Jersey) attempted to get more than 126 Republican representatives removed from the House of Representatives in 2021.

Tell me, just what kind of "democracy" do you think this is?


Can you explain her close relationship with Assad of Syria who is a close ally of Russia and Iran?

https://apnews.com/article/gabbard-trump-putin-intelligence-russia-syria-a798adaf9cd531a5d0c9329f7597f0f6
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/4990947-gabbard-syria-controversy-dni-nomination/


Can you explain Joe Biden's close relationship with Xi Jinping, Secretary General of the Chinese Communist Party?


No because it only exists in your imagination.

Anonymous
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as DNI is the result of a covert Russian plot against the United States.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as DNI is the result of a covert Russian plot against the United States.

^Chinese propaganda.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as DNI is the result of a covert Russian plot against the United States.

^Chinese propaganda.


Tulsi wants us to back away from Russia AND she wants us to back away from China.

Her positions create a power vacuum for them to fill.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as DNI is the result of a covert Russian plot against the United States.

^Chinese propaganda.


Tulsi wants us to back away from Russia AND she wants us to back away from China.

Her positions create a power vacuum for them to fill.


She wants us to back away and focus on the US the way these countries focus on their own backyard first. China was able to become a powerhouse because it didn’t get involved in stupid proxy wars. They spent billions on high speed rail while the US, three times the land size, doesn’t have any way for those who live in Chicago to go to work in LA and commute back etc
Anonymous
If you want the Washington establishment to run government and continue in positions of power, nothing will change. We will continue spending money on pointless wars with zero ROI
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as DNI is the result of a covert Russian plot against the United States.

^Chinese propaganda.


Tulsi wants us to back away from Russia AND she wants us to back away from China.

Her positions create a power vacuum for them to fill.


She wants us to back away and focus on the US the way these countries focus on their own backyard first. China was able to become a powerhouse because it didn’t get involved in stupid proxy wars. They spent billions on high speed rail while the US, three times the land size, doesn’t have any way for those who live in Chicago to go to work in LA and commute back etc


Ah yes, China, the vaunted democracy, fulfilling the will of its voters, was able to successfully build high speed rail while the US, essentially the exact same country, has not.

Is that your contention?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.

Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.

Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation.

Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?

If you never questioned the credentials of Biden’s natsec appointments then you really don’t get to question Trump’s selections. Particularly since Biden has probably been the worst President for American power in since, well, pre-WW2. His team was a bunch of incompetent lackeys.


It was somewhat shocking (well, not really) that Biden didn't save any positions in his administration for Gabbard. She was very well suited for some of them, and it would have been a great way to show that the Democratic Party was above empowering the petty smears coming out of the sleaze & corruption wing of the party.



Maybe it has something to do with why someone on Russian TV called her “our girlfriend”?


They don’t literally mean girlfriend as in lover. They just mean a female friend to Russia. Contrary to Washington propaganda, Russians are excited to form a friendship and a bond with the US/Americans. Most leaders are. Washington wants another Cold War.



Hahahahahahhaha


It’s quite embarrassing Democrats are war hawks and embrace neocon policies now. Trump wants to clean up Big Pharma and the Pentagon and our intelligence agencies and Democrats are mad about that? RFK and Tulsi would’ve been dream picks for a progressive 10 years ago


“Clean up”? No. He has been very clear that he wants to destroy everything. And then there is his life history of finding ways to personally profit off of everything.

Please read How Democracies Die.

In darkness ?
Ok wapo ,


It’s a book. You should try reading. It’s a shame Americans think Tik Tok is a substitute. So here we are.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Shes a destabilizing opportunist. BTDT with her and Bernie and splitting the DNC in 2016. She's a vapid anything goes talking mouthpiece for Putin who's given her relevancy.

What politician isn’t an opportunist?

Surely Kamala Harris has to be the biggest opportunist of all time? Plotting as the VP to force the President out of the campaign so that she could lead the ticket.

Exactly. Everyone knows how she got her start in politics. She’s the ultimate opportunist.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Yup. The drip, drip, drip has started and this nom is also likely doomed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as DNI is the result of a covert Russian plot against the United States.

^Chinese propaganda.


Tulsi wants us to back away from Russia AND she wants us to back away from China.

Her positions create a power vacuum for them to fill.


She wants us to back away and focus on the US the way these countries focus on their own backyard first. China was able to become a powerhouse because it didn’t get involved in stupid proxy wars. They spent billions on high speed rail while the US, three times the land size, doesn’t have any way for those who live in Chicago to go to work in LA and commute back etc


You seem completely unqualified to speak on this topic.

China is HEAVILY involved in other countries, for example in Africa,
South Africa: China has invested heavily in mining and energy sectors.
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): Major investments in mining, particularly in cobalt and copper.
Zambia: Significant investments in the copper mining industry.
Angola: Investments in oil and infrastructure.
Nigeria: Investments in oil, gas, and infrastructure projects.
Kenya: Investments in infrastructure, including roads and railways.
Ethiopia: Investments in infrastructure, such as the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway.
Ghana: Investments in mining and infrastructure.
Tanzania: Investments in mining and infrastructure.
Mozambique: Investments in natural gas and infrastructure.
Zimbabwe: Investments in infrastructure and agriculture.
Algeria: Investments in energy and infrastructure.

In OUR back yard -
Brazil: Energy and Infrastructure: China has invested heavily in Brazil's energy sector, including oil and gas projects, and infrastructure development. The two countries have a strong trade relationship, with China being Brazil's largest trading partner.
Peru: Chancay Port: China has invested $3.5 billion in the Chancay port project, creating a direct sea corridor between Shanghai and Peru. This port is expected to enhance trade relations and reduce shipping times and costs, Mining: China is a major investor in Peru's mining sector, controlling several of the country's largest mines.
Chile: Lithium Production: China has invested in Chile's lithium production, which is crucial for electric vehicle batteries. Chinese companies have significant stakes in Chilean lithium mining operations
Argentina: Energy and Mining: China has invested in Argentina's energy and mining sectors, including renewable energy projects and lithium mining.
Ecuador: Infrastructure Projects: China has funded various infrastructure projects in Ecuador, including roads and hydroelectric plants.
Venezuela: Energy and Infrastructure: China has provided loans and investments in Venezuela's energy and infrastructure sectors, helping to develop oil and gas projects.

And so on. While Republicans have the US going isolationist and retreating from leadership, China is stepping up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


Not breaking news. She talked about it months ago as retaliation by Biden.

https://youtu.be/L1wy_kppu5U?si=XyGKUZgSKb0Hpm0X
Anonymous
Tom Nichols, a true conservative, called her a national security risk and a “blinking Christmas tree” of warnings.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: