No it’s not. |
Using childcare isn't neglectful, but custody agreements are generally written to maximize each parent's time with the kids.
I can sort of understand Dad's reasoning on not allowing mom to pick up from preschool. I don't understand why Dad has the kid on a weekend when he's going to be working all of it. I don't know what Dad's two days are off. Let's imagine that they're Tuesday and Thursday A more sensible arrangement would be that Dad picks up the kid from mom's house every Monday when he gets off work. Keeps kid at home Tuesday and Thursday, and sends her to preschool on Wed with aftercare of his choice. Then on Friday he drops off at preschool, and mom picks her up. She gets more hours with Dad that she had before, and more hours with mom, and there's on transition from parent to parent on Monday, plus if mom gets a full time job she's got childcare and doesn't need T/Th off. Then they just need to go to court to figure out reasonable child support and legal custody. My guess is that if the judge will say that if they're forced to stop joint legal custody, it will go to Dad, since mom's request for sole legal is ridiculous, but I think that Dad needs to figure out how to be reachable in an emergency, or since it sounds like maybe he is and that's something he made up thinking it would help his case, needs to drop that argument. |
It could easily be written for a length of time for a work day, like eight or more hours, and the child would benefit from it used for longer times. |
I haven’t read the entire thread but this is why it is so so so stupid for people to go to trial over custody. Fwiw studies show that in cases that do, typically one or both parents have a cluster B personality disorder. |
Bingo. I posted above. Most custody cases are really child support cases, and most custody cases that go to trial are fueled by one or more of the parents having a personality disorder. - signed lawyer |
Sure but OP doesn’t have to agree to it, and I don’t think a judge would order it in light of the mom’s irrational and high-conflict approach. |
Did you read the whole thread? Granted it’s the dad posting, but if even 50% of what he posted is true, it’s the mom with personality issues here. No evidence dad is in it to prevent child support orders. |
I said I hadn’t read the whole thread. And I specifically said one or more of the parents likely had a PD. I didn’t say who. But I’ll mention most judges don’t love girlfriends/boyfriends stepping in in place of parents. And I’ll also add that many people project their issues onto others so we have to take OPs perspective with a huge grain of salt. Unless the mother is objectively abusive or neglectful, there is no reason she shouldn’t have close to primary custody, with ample visitation to OP. Not agreeing to that suggests there are some personality/control issues, and judges aren’t fools. I’ve seen many many custody cases and know what I’m talking about. If OP is truly reasonable, he needs to settle this in mediation. |
OP here. I tried to settle in mediation. I wanted to keep the 50/50 parenting schedule we have always had and order joint custody so we both can continue to make decisions as we always have. She refused because I wouldn’t agree to right of first refusal for any length of time that I won’t be with our child, which I don’t want because at best it is disruptive and logistically challenging but also because my ex will abuse it. She has stated specifically that her goal is to ensure our child spends no time with either my (now) fiancée or my mother when I’m not around. She stated that her intentions are to pursue sole legal custody and limit my parenting time/visitation to the standard every other weekend. In the meantime, my ex still has no job or real income (got the recent uniform support declaration, she reported $0 in income and $4500 in monthly expenses) and since she couldn’t afford rent at their house once her 52 weeks of unemployment were exhausted, has moved into one room in a house share with our child who no longer has a bed or space of their own. Sure, she is not abusive or neglectful, but I don’t understand why you’re saying there’s no reason she shouldn’t have primary custody over me when I am stably employed, maintain the child’s health insurance, provide stable housing where our child has their own room, etc. Just because my days off are during the week and not the weekend, and because I have a partner who lives with us? |
cite please? |
You keep bringing up money, but money is separate from custody. Especially when the solution includes child support that you aren’t paying. You also keep sidestepping the issue of why you don’t want a custody arrangement that gives you your days off with the kid and lets her have weekends. |
I've posted earlier in the thread, but I'll reiterate-and I'm not a lawyer-I think the fact that you want to keep custody status quo and settle in mediation, looks good for you and a judge would find that reasonable. The mom does not have any standing to get sole custody (the legal part, I don't know because it's different in each state). I don't think the judge will be amused by her wanting sole custody and every other weekend to you-typically 50/50 is presumed and it's what you've been doing. I don't think any judge would order no-time rofr. That's usually for 4 hours or longer. In your case, 8, 10 or more hours would be better, so dd could stay with gma/gf on your workdays and you would get dd if mom leaves her for that time, also. Or judge may order No rofr, in which case she wouldn't get dd if you're at work, but you wouldn't get her either if mom is away. The housing isn't an issue-the child has housing at both parents. The child support is a formula, and mom will be imputed at some wage, not $0. But it's just a formula so it will go by your state's. You might want to seek to have My Family Wizard communication ordered. But ask your lawyer about that. |
Not OP but the only reason this woman is available all the time including weekends is because she doesn't have a job. That's not going to last forever, and who knows what her working schedule will be? Why would OP agree to change the status quo of years based on her availability now, which isn't sustainable? |
In OP's state, joint custody can't be ordered. When one party will not agree to joint, the court must order sole legal custody to one or the other. Neither of them have any reason to lose custody, so I think that's the gist of OP's question. How is a judge going to make that decision? |
Presumably, OP would want to change the status quo based on wanting to spend time with his kid. If Mom gets a job that includes weekends, then they can renegotiate. They can even write that into the agreement, but right now, if Dad's days off are limited, then he should have the kids on their days off. |