You’re a piece of work aren’t you |
You are pulling top kids from their home schools. If they remained at their home school would they have the same acceptances. Probably. Maybe more. Less competition. |
| I think the magnet was helpful to my kid (and hopefully 2nd as well) for both learning and admissions. I have 2 kids with super artsy ECs but an interest in some areas of stem. I liked the idea of the magnets for the deeper learning but also to encourage them to keep stem as an option for major/career. I'll admit that I also thought the prestige was helpful. My #1 stood out and got several T15 admits in RD. I think the issue with some peers is that their portfolio of stuff (school, rigor, grades scores, ECs, honors etc) look too similar. My kid stood out. She is now pursuing math and arts in college. The magnet gave her a math depth that could not have been possible at other schools, and the arts helped differentiate her from other classmates. 2nd kid will mix stem magnet with being a classically trained singer, pro actor and artisan (in unique field). Hoping that will help her stand out. Both have the grades and scores. Also, these are ECs that my kids are genuinely passionate about. I know some magnet friends have been on a prescribed path of JH cty, math enrichment, amc/aime, strings/piano and golf/tennis. Maybe more lattitude in kids' activities would help. |
I wouldn't go this far. Yes, lots of bright and gifted students in the magnets, but I also know lots of equally bright and gifted kids who didn't get in or chose to stay at home school. Lots of bright kids in MCPS! Both my kids were in all the magnets-- elem through hs. |
|
I’m new to this site and just discovered it last week. My child is a freshman at phs smacs program and it’s crazy the amount of work they give these kids, they work all the time and have no breaks. They have yet to have even a field trip this school year, while all the other prgms have had multiple field trips.
The teachers in the prgm are so condescending, downright mean, and lack major communication skillsand don’t actually teach the kids and just lecture them. Two of the freshman teachers have been around for a LONG time, so I guess admin can’t do anything about there incompetence. All the kids have to learn physics and chemistry and everyhting else on their own using YouTube videos or khan Academy. I hope this helps/informs someone in the future realize that this program is NOT at all what it seems be. The program is relying on solely the kids to do well themselves and has nothing to do with the program or the teachers. |
| Yes for UMD STEM. Otherwise, no. |
If this is true, it is unfortunate |
I'm sorry that you had this bad experience. This year's 9th grade Fall teachers are fantastic. The physics teacher in particular has been winning awards for excellence for many, many years. |
|
In terms of college admissions, it will depend on what the home school option is. Bright kids need a peer group to really get it going. And if that's not available at the local school, magnet is definitely the better option.
But if you are zoned in a high performing district with all the tracked and AP options, I don't see why anyone would chose a magnet. MIT and Stanford aren't taking more than a handful of students at best from any school, even the magnets. As a parent, I would focus on peer group when deciding. |
There are many excellent universities that are appropriate for magnet students. I don't see the point in just striving for the very top. Not going magnet and just taking a couple of levels of calculus and some AP science is fine too. Colleges like to see well rounded people, so those other electives and extra curricular activities mean something. A high performer challenging themselves in a magnet is fine too. But certainly not the only path. |
MIT accepted at least 8 from Blair and 3 from RMIB this past cycle. 0-1 students at other MCPS schools (mostly 0). I think for students gunning for MIT/CalTech/Harvey Mudd/CMU, the magnets do give a significant admissions advantage. Yale, Harvard, Penn, Duke, and Hopkins seem to favor the magnet programs, too. Stanford, Princeton, and Brown, less so. Not sure about Cornell, seems to vary by year. It isn't easy to stand out with so many high-stats, competitive peers. I do consistently hear RMIB's focus on analytical writing is excellent preparation for college, but it is a very tough workload that typically doesn't allow the time for competitions etc. that Blair does so well. |
I agree. For us, it's not just the peer group but also how early my kid would have to wake up. We like our kid's MS magnet and will continue there, but having to wake up at 6am is difficult. I know many middle schoolers have to do this, but I think sleep is essential, and it's almost impossible for us to get to sleep earlier than we do. I don't want my kid to have to wake up even earlier to commute to a magnet (due to the even earlier HS bell time). |
I'm not sure you can attribute that to Blair. It's possible those kids would have been accepted at those schools had they stayed at their home schools. Blair's program drew those kids. I'm not seeing evidence that Blair turned what otherwise would have been UMD students into MIT students. |
A kid in the top 5-10% at any MCPS HS, magnet or no, is going to have excellent outcomes. If kid is serious about STEM, there is nothing like the Blair curriculum, though there is also nothing like the competition there. If you can get a 4.0 at Blair and get national/international awards, high probability of Ivy admission. If a strong student, but not competitive at that level, probably better off staying at the home school and working on interesting ECs. Same with RMIB which, contrary to the stereotype, has lots of STEM kids too, though more kids applying to humanities or social science majors than Blair of course. |
My DC wakes up at 6:50 am if I drive, or 6:35 am if I send them to the nearest bus stop. We are living in one of the Ws, and it's not a painful drive as Blair is adjacent to 495. The three-year driving experience to TPMS was way much more painful so I let my younger one stay with local MS. For my DC, peer group was the most important reason for them to choose Blair, and the second reason was the strong curriculum. |