SCOTUS Protection Request

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.

https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711

Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.

And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.

Yep. "Hypocrites" doesn't even begin to describe these people. I happen to be pro-choice, but this behavior is sickening. Were there conservative activists targeting justices' homes back in 1973 when Roe came into existence? No. Why are liberal activists such complete loons?

These kinds of tactics were practically invented by anti-abortion prostrates. They stalked doctors and staff, camped out by clinics, and harassed women. The fact that you don’t know this is pretty telling.

What SC Justice did this?

I love the argument of “ well they did this first” as the justification for these tactics. Your right to harass a SC Justice ends at the point when I am enjoying my delicious Morton’s dinner. Those people are not harassing just one person but everyone there and the establishment.

The fact that the hypocrites wouldn’t stand for these tactics on the liberal members of the court is very telling!

Nope. If predators can pray at football games I can protest at a restaurant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not want a progressive Justice, voting to allow less restricted euthanasia, for example, to be threatened at their private home. I am for protecting Justices' families, and particularly minor children, from any controversy surrounding their parent's professional decisions.

It's hard to watch a Clarence and a treasonous Ginny strutting about without fear of consequences. It's hard to read Alito citing such racist and misogynist texts upon which to base his decision and writing about women in such a degrading manner.

But this is their job. They should not be disturbed at their home.

The protestors are on public property. I don’t think justices deserve special protection from peaceful protests. They already have effective protection against actual threats—the man who traveled to Kavanaugh’s house was arrested.

They’ve decided to live in liberal neighborhoods among people who disagree with them. The conservative justices can move out to rural MD or Va if they’d like to feel more comfortable.

No, they don't deserve special protection. They've chosen guns over children. My world is less safe because of them. My daughter has fewer rights. God forbid she ever gets pregnant and needs an abortion. God forgive she ever has an ectopic pregnancy that needs to be ended.

No, the SCOTUS justices who voted to weaken gun laws should pay for their own protection. No more US protection for them to protect them from gun crazies. They brought this on themselves, and they should pay to protect themselves from the evil they've stirred up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh had to leave by back door while dining at Morton's Steaks because of demonstrations at front. Poor whittle beer guzzler. Owner or manager was upset. I don't think he realizes that women generally choose the restaurant. Boycott Morton's and all restaurants that serve these six justices.

https://meaww.com/mortons-brett-kavanaugh-restaurant-protests?utm_source=smartnewsapp&utm_medium=articlelink&utm_campaign=575711

Try this with purported liberal Justices and you'll have Merrick Garland breathing down your neck.
Or, at the very least... a pre-dawn raid with CNN in tow.

And, of course.... Twitter allows this targeted harassment.

Yep. "Hypocrites" doesn't even begin to describe these people. I happen to be pro-choice, but this behavior is sickening. Were there conservative activists targeting justices' homes back in 1973 when Roe came into existence? No. Why are liberal activists such complete loons?

These kinds of tactics were practically invented by anti-abortion prostrates. They stalked doctors and staff, camped out by clinics, and harassed women. The fact that you don’t know this is pretty telling.

What SC Justice did this?

I love the argument of “ well they did this first” as the justification for these tactics. Your right to harass a SC Justice ends at the point when I am enjoying my delicious Morton’s dinner. Those people are not harassing just one person but everyone there and the establishment.

The fact that the hypocrites wouldn’t stand for these tactics on the liberal members of the court is very telling!

I'm THRILLED the left is adopting the tactics of the right-wing GOP cultists.

No more effing "high ground." Good. The GOP deserves a taste of their own medicine. They are evil, and we must fight back with everything we've got (short of guns, which I don't believe in using ever, outside of a well-organized militia.)

Finally, the Democrats are fighting back, and fighting to WIN!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

x100000

[Anonymous]

They aren't Justices, they are partisan hacks. Gorsuch and Sister Coney Barrett were installed illegitimately by the Senate. Gorsuch could only be installed because Garland was denied a hearing for a year and Sister Barrett was rammed through with no deliberation at all and just as the nation was about to go to the ballot box to say they wanted someone else making the nomination.

I'll mourn the demise of the rule of law that they implemented, but not the fact that one of their steak dinners was less pleasant.