Reply to SCOTUS Protection Request

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS Protection Request"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would not want a progressive Justice, voting to allow less restricted euthanasia, for example, to be threatened at their private home. I am for protecting Justices' families, and particularly minor children, from any controversy surrounding their parent's professional decisions.

It's hard to watch a Clarence and a treasonous Ginny strutting about without fear of consequences. It's hard to read Alito citing such racist and misogynist texts upon which to base his decision and writing about women in such a degrading manner.

But this is their job. They should not be disturbed at their home.[/quote]

The protestors are on public property. I don’t think justices deserve special protection from peaceful protests. They already have effective protection against actual threats—the man who traveled to Kavanaugh’s house was arrested.

They’ve decided to live in liberal neighborhoods among people who disagree with them. The conservative justices can move out to rural MD or Va if they’d like to feel more comfortable. [/quote]

No, they don't deserve special protection. They've chosen guns over children. My world is less safe because of them. My daughter has fewer rights. God forbid she ever gets pregnant and needs an abortion. God forgive she ever has an ectopic pregnancy that needs to be ended.

No, the SCOTUS justices who voted to weaken gun laws should pay for their own protection. No more US protection for them to protect them from gun crazies. They brought this on themselves, and they should pay to protect themselves from the evil they've stirred up. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics