Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sad to say it but the LBGTQIA+ lobby FAFOd with forced teaming the trans stuff. Pushing an unpopular 90-10 issue down the throats of the silent majority of middle America was never going to end well.
I'm not saying you're wrong but how is that relevant?
NP. The encroachment of transgender ideology on every area of life after Obergefell has
killed public support for gay rights. Republicans now smell blood in the water and think they can roll back gay rights without suffering at the ballotbox. I think they're right.
Killed is a pretty strong word. Have you seen polling that indicates this?
NP. Killed is too strong. But polls are showing a sharp decline of support for trans rights overall.
New, new poster. I see the backlash, focused on trans people in particular, but gay marriage is woven into society now in a way that most normal Americans won't allow to be undone. Everyone has a gay neighbor, niece, friend, teacher or co-worker. That cake is baked.
Gay marriage owes its existence to a savvy public relations campaign launched when Republicans were more focused on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the recession, than on gays. Public support for gay marriage is very soft in the sense that the majority of those who say they supported don't really care and don't consider it an issue worth changing their vote over.
The new public relations campaign against gay marriage that conservatives have launched is working. The way gays have strapped themselves to the grenade that is trans activism is an own goal that further helps conservatives. Bookmark this thread and come back to admit you were wrong when Obergefell falls. It's coming.
On the plus side, there will be useful lessons for other social justice movements to learn from how gays built and then took down their own movement. Future social justice movements will have less hubris and be a lot more cautious, I believe.