In what ways would you be considered trashy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

I only brief
Ly responded to a poster wrongly designating him or herself as trashy for doing an essential but low paid job. Someone else took issue that we would all be less trashy if we paid living wages.

There is tons of evidence to support the value to workers, employers, the economy and society by providing living wages and I will be happy to start a new thread about this.

Your “brief response” was under the guise of telling someone they are not trashy for their job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

NP. So just to clarify, you are against paying people a living wage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

NP. So just to clarify, you are against paying people a living wage?

So just to clarify, you did intend to hijack the forum for your agenda?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

NP. So just to clarify, you are against paying people a living wage?

So just to clarify, you did intend to hijack the forum for your agenda?

Do you need someone to explain to you what “NP” means?

[Anonymous]

I play the lottery weekly with the full expectation that I will win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

NP. So just to clarify, you are against paying people a living wage?

So just to clarify, you did intend to hijack the forum for your agenda?

Do you need someone to explain to you what “NP” means?

Do you need someone to explain to you what hijacking means?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

NP. So just to clarify, you are against paying people a living wage?

No one said on here said people shouldn’t have a living wage. No one anywhere would say that. Nice try on trying to twist it into what it’s not about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t answer the question.
Start another board and stop trying to insert your agenda on forums that have nothing to do with your politics.

Yes, don’t ask underhanded questions that invite statistical answers that require “politics” either.

There was no answer to the question. Only more politics for your agenda that you’ve hijacked this forum for.

See above. There was an answer.


I was merely clarifying that a person doing an essential but low paid job is not trashy. We are lol less trashy when we value the time and work of others as well as ourselves.

There is tons of evidence of the value to employers, workers, the economy and societies when living wages are in place. I will be happy to start a new thread but the response was actually extremely relevant to the topic.

However apologies to OP if it feels like I hijacked a rather entertaining thread.

NP. No there isn’t. Only the “impact” without saying who pays.

NP. So just to clarify, you are against paying people a living wage?

You have the answer that was asked?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We are millionaires, but our cars are teenagers, we mow our own grass, shop at Old Navy and Costco, recycle shopping bags, drink sodas out of the can, we camp, grow an organic veggie garden but....

We never:

Buy Starbucks coffee, shop at Walmart, put Trump flags on our front lawn, smoke, have long fingernails, piercings or tattoos, own a pit bull, have kids by different baby parents, drink more than 2 drinks occasionally, abuse drugs, watch TV preachers, buy overpriced designer handbags- even fakes, wear cheap shoes

.....ok?

[Anonymous]

I used to buy my then-toddlers cheap sneakers and cute flats from Payless. They each had a huge shoe collection.

My Jessica Simpson brand jean jacket purchased at Ross is a wardrobe staple.

I still love hand-me-downs; my sister, mom and female cousins and I constantly swap/mail clothing items to each other with the promise to “keep/wear/enjoy/pass along to someone else/donate/do not return.”

I am obsessed with creating a thrift store wardrobe. I am very well-dressed!

I get gift cards to CVS as gifts. My family knows I love a great CVS shopping spree.

[Anonymous]

Living wage topic that arose from telling low paid, essential worker they are not trashy has been moved to political forum. Apologies to OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wait I’m confused. In the summer, with sandals, my toenails should or should not be painted?

I’m bumping my question because it wasn’t sarcastic. I’d actually like the answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Living wage topic that arose from telling low paid, essential worker they are not trashy has been moved to political forum. Apologies to OP.

You just did it again.