The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

Indeed. She has left a big part of the equation out of the end of her marriage and divorce. Oh he abused me, was a narcissist, controlling...but, I’ll not mention that I was addicted to pills, alcohol, whatever and possibly acted erratically a lot, even around the kids. She is telling a very one-sided story. Her addiction does not invalidate his actions at all, but he was not obligated to stay and be supportive of the path she was taking.

Kane, while divulging more on air than she should have, he should have said nothing, has been at the least classy enough to not mention her issues with substance abuse, since she clearly is embarrassed and ashamed. The couple divorcées that I know who divorced due to substance issues were vocal about their spouse’s issue.

Do you honestly think he, intern John, and/or the minions of the show didn't post any of that here? Come on, get real!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

Indeed. She has left a big part of the equation out of the end of her marriage and divorce. Oh he abused me, was a narcissist, controlling...but, I’ll not mention that I was addicted to pills, alcohol, whatever and possibly acted erratically a lot, even around the kids. She is telling a very one-sided story. Her addiction does not invalidate his actions at all, but he was not obligated to stay and be supportive of the path she was taking.

Kane, while divulging more on air than she should have, he should have said nothing, has been at the least classy enough to not mention her issues with substance abuse, since she clearly is embarrassed and ashamed. The couple divorcées that I know who divorced due to substance issues were vocal about their spouse’s issue.

Do you honestly think he, intern John, and/or the minions of the show didn't post any of that here? Come on, get real!

False equivalency. Nice try, though. Even if he did it here, he'd be doing it under anonymity, to much skepticism doing so, and to a MUCH smaller audience.

[Anonymous]

I don’t think Kane has posted here because he probably would’ve asked to have the thread locked/shut down if he did, reading the things people have said about him here. Natasha however has admitted to reading DCUM threads about her and complained about the last round. That’s what started promoted the rule of not discussing spouses/former spouses of TKS members. All the rules have clearly gone out the window — again — but the thread isn’t being locked for whatever reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

I mean, maybe it was a hiking group for sober people?

NP here

Just because you're an addict, doesn't mean you hike. Because you are an addict, you seek an activity to help fill your soul and satisfy it. What she said about hiking is true, even in the context of choosing a hiking hobby while in rehab.

We're essentially saying the same thing. Everyone is hyper focused on her meeting him "in rehab" and not "in a hiking group" but what's to say it wasn't a group in the rehab who went hiking? She really doesn't/didn't owe anyone the specific explanation. Goes along with the narrative a pp said about just nitpicking the women to death over every detail.

What makes it ridiculous is she wrote such a folksy explanation for why she joined her “hiking club” when in reality she was an addict receiving treatment. That wasn’t bending the truth... it’s a lie. One she didn’t even need to tell, which is what I find most troubling. She deliberately lied to make herself and her relationship look more wholesome than the truth. She could have just said they met in March (or whatever month) and omitted any other details. It’s also weird AF she won’t show her husband’s face on Instagram but he’s all over her Facebook page. If she’s scared of people identifying her husband why wouldn’t she hide him on Facebook as well? It’s odd.

[Anonymous]

What is her Facebook page?

[Anonymous]

NP. What was she addicted to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NP. What was she addicted to?

No one knows for sure but best guess is pills. She took a cocktail for fibromyalgia including elavil that she’s posted about before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

I mean, maybe it was a hiking group for sober people?

NP here

Just because you're an addict, doesn't mean you hike. Because you are an addict, you seek an activity to help fill your soul and satisfy it. What she said about hiking is true, even in the context of choosing a hiking hobby while in rehab.

We're essentially saying the same thing. Everyone is hyper focused on her meeting him "in rehab" and not "in a hiking group" but what's to say it wasn't a group in the rehab who went hiking? She really doesn't/didn't owe anyone the specific explanation. Goes along with the narrative a pp said about just nitpicking the women to death over every detail.

What makes it ridiculous is she wrote such a folksy explanation for why she joined her “hiking club” when in reality she was an addict receiving treatment. That wasn’t bending the truth... it’s a lie. One she didn’t even need to tell, which is what I find most troubling. She deliberately lied to make herself and her relationship look more wholesome than the truth. She could have just said they met in March (or whatever month) and omitted any other details. It’s also weird AF she won’t show her husband’s face on Instagram but he’s all over her Facebook page. If she’s scared of people identifying her husband why wouldn’t she hide him on Facebook as well? It’s odd.

Agreed. She tries too hard. I heard somewhere the more unnecessary detail someone adds to a story, the more likely they’re lying. I think of that when I read her posts including the hiking excerpt posted earlier. Does anyone else remember her blog post about the day she hit her head and Kane came to drop off the girls and found blood in the driveway and her strung tf out inside the house? Then she demonized him for not wanting to leave the girls with her (injured and likely doped up). I checked her blog and she deleted it, but it reminded me of the same thing. Instead of a simple lie of “oh, I slipped and fell” she spun this narrative of a complicated craft she was attempting (outside... in the cold) to explain why she hit her head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

I mean, maybe it was a hiking group for sober people?

NP here

Just because you're an addict, doesn't mean you hike. Because you are an addict, you seek an activity to help fill your soul and satisfy it. What she said about hiking is true, even in the context of choosing a hiking hobby while in rehab.

We're essentially saying the same thing. Everyone is hyper focused on her meeting him "in rehab" and not "in a hiking group" but what's to say it wasn't a group in the rehab who went hiking? She really doesn't/didn't owe anyone the specific explanation. Goes along with the narrative a pp said about just nitpicking the women to death over every detail.

What makes it ridiculous is she wrote such a folksy explanation for why she joined her “hiking club” when in reality she was an addict receiving treatment. That wasn’t bending the truth... it’s a lie. One she didn’t even need to tell, which is what I find most troubling. She deliberately lied to make herself and her relationship look more wholesome than the truth. She could have just said they met in March (or whatever month) and omitted any other details. It’s also weird AF she won’t show her husband’s face on Instagram but he’s all over her Facebook page. If she’s scared of people identifying her husband why wouldn’t she hide him on Facebook as well? It’s odd.

Agreed. She tries too hard. I heard somewhere the more unnecessary detail someone adds to a story, the more likely they’re lying. I think of that when I read her posts including the hiking excerpt posted earlier. Does anyone else remember her blog post about the day she hit her head and Kane came to drop off the girls and found blood in the driveway and her strung tf out inside the house? Then she demonized him for not wanting to leave the girls with her (injured and likely doped up). I checked her blog and she deleted it, but it reminded me of the same thing. Instead of a simple lie of “oh, I slipped and fell” she spun this narrative of a complicated craft she was attempting (outside... in the cold) to explain why she hit her head.

I thought we were discussing the Kane show here? Or is this really a long diatribe on how the wife of the head of the Kane show is not to be trusted in order to obfuscate the clear issues in his own character?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

Indeed. She has left a big part of the equation out of the end of her marriage and divorce. Oh he abused me, was a narcissist, controlling...but, I’ll not mention that I was addicted to pills, alcohol, whatever and possibly acted erratically a lot, even around the kids. She is telling a very one-sided story. Her addiction does not invalidate his actions at all, but he was not obligated to stay and be supportive of the path she was taking.

Kane, while divulging more on air than she should have, he should have said nothing, has been at the least classy enough to not mention her issues with substance abuse, since she clearly is embarrassed and ashamed. The couple divorcées that I know who divorced due to substance issues were vocal about their spouse’s issue.

Do you honestly think he, intern John, and/or the minions of the show didn't post any of that here? Come on, get real!

False equivalency. Nice try, though. Even if he did it here, he'd be doing it under anonymity, to much skepticism doing so, and to a MUCH smaller audience.

She could NEVER reach the audience he did with his crybaby antics on the radio. Nice try, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

I mean, maybe it was a hiking group for sober people?

NP here

Just because you're an addict, doesn't mean you hike. Because you are an addict, you seek an activity to help fill your soul and satisfy it. What she said about hiking is true, even in the context of choosing a hiking hobby while in rehab.

We're essentially saying the same thing. Everyone is hyper focused on her meeting him "in rehab" and not "in a hiking group" but what's to say it wasn't a group in the rehab who went hiking? She really doesn't/didn't owe anyone the specific explanation. Goes along with the narrative a pp said about just nitpicking the women to death over every detail.

What makes it ridiculous is she wrote such a folksy explanation for why she joined her “hiking club” when in reality she was an addict receiving treatment. That wasn’t bending the truth... it’s a lie. One she didn’t even need to tell, which is what I find most troubling. She deliberately lied to make herself and her relationship look more wholesome than the truth. She could have just said they met in March (or whatever month) and omitted any other details. It’s also weird AF she won’t show her husband’s face on Instagram but he’s all over her Facebook page. If she’s scared of people identifying her husband why wouldn’t she hide him on Facebook as well? It’s odd.

I don't even blame her. Again she owed you no explanation, not even the truth. Remember she's used to having to make things look more "wholesome" for the sake of appearances. Kane had it that way for YEARS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

I mean, maybe it was a hiking group for sober people?

NP here

Just because you're an addict, doesn't mean you hike. Because you are an addict, you seek an activity to help fill your soul and satisfy it. What she said about hiking is true, even in the context of choosing a hiking hobby while in rehab.

We're essentially saying the same thing. Everyone is hyper focused on her meeting him "in rehab" and not "in a hiking group" but what's to say it wasn't a group in the rehab who went hiking? She really doesn't/didn't owe anyone the specific explanation. Goes along with the narrative a pp said about just nitpicking the women to death over every detail.

What makes it ridiculous is she wrote such a folksy explanation for why she joined her “hiking club” when in reality she was an addict receiving treatment. That wasn’t bending the truth... it’s a lie. One she didn’t even need to tell, which is what I find most troubling. She deliberately lied to make herself and her relationship look more wholesome than the truth. She could have just said they met in March (or whatever month) and omitted any other details. It’s also weird AF she won’t show her husband’s face on Instagram but he’s all over her Facebook page. If she’s scared of people identifying her husband why wouldn’t she hide him on Facebook as well? It’s odd.

Agreed. She tries too hard. I heard somewhere the more unnecessary detail someone adds to a story, the more likely they’re lying. I think of that when I read her posts including the hiking excerpt posted earlier. Does anyone else remember her blog post about the day she hit her head and Kane came to drop off the girls and found blood in the driveway and her strung tf out inside the house? Then she demonized him for not wanting to leave the girls with her (injured and likely doped up). I checked her blog and she deleted it, but it reminded me of the same thing. Instead of a simple lie of “oh, I slipped and fell” she spun this narrative of a complicated craft she was attempting (outside... in the cold) to explain why she hit her head.

I thought we were discussing the Kane show here? Or is this really a long diatribe on how the wife of the head of the Kane show is not to be trusted in order to obfuscate the clear issues in his own character?

THIS. Can we get back to the subject? How can none of you dig up his whereabouts I thought DCUM people worked wonders on finding out dirty details lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

I mean, maybe it was a hiking group for sober people?

NP here

Just because you're an addict, doesn't mean you hike. Because you are an addict, you seek an activity to help fill your soul and satisfy it. What she said about hiking is true, even in the context of choosing a hiking hobby while in rehab.

We're essentially saying the same thing. Everyone is hyper focused on her meeting him "in rehab" and not "in a hiking group" but what's to say it wasn't a group in the rehab who went hiking? She really doesn't/didn't owe anyone the specific explanation. Goes along with the narrative a pp said about just nitpicking the women to death over every detail.

What makes it ridiculous is she wrote such a folksy explanation for why she joined her “hiking club” when in reality she was an addict receiving treatment. That wasn’t bending the truth... it’s a lie. One she didn’t even need to tell, which is what I find most troubling. She deliberately lied to make herself and her relationship look more wholesome than the truth. She could have just said they met in March (or whatever month) and omitted any other details. It’s also weird AF she won’t show her husband’s face on Instagram but he’s all over her Facebook page. If she’s scared of people identifying her husband why wouldn’t she hide him on Facebook as well? It’s odd.

Agreed. She tries too hard. I heard somewhere the more unnecessary detail someone adds to a story, the more likely they’re lying. I think of that when I read her posts including the hiking excerpt posted earlier. Does anyone else remember her blog post about the day she hit her head and Kane came to drop off the girls and found blood in the driveway and her strung tf out inside the house? Then she demonized him for not wanting to leave the girls with her (injured and likely doped up). I checked her blog and she deleted it, but it reminded me of the same thing. Instead of a simple lie of “oh, I slipped and fell” she spun this narrative of a complicated craft she was attempting (outside... in the cold) to explain why she hit her head.

I thought we were discussing the Kane show here? Or is this really a long diatribe on how the wife of the head of the Kane show is not to be trusted in order to obfuscate the clear issues in his own character?

You're so right I don't care one bit about Natasha, Danni, Sarah, etc etc etc the fact is Kane was fired abruptly for obviously a clear and very bad reason. Why are we not focusing on that? The credibility of others has no bearing on it. He got shown the door!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm starting to believe some of what Kane said during his radio meltdown (about Natasha hitting things with the van/hiding it, not paying bills etc.) knowing now she was an addict at the time... (Kane asked Natasha for a divorce in May 2015 - She said she's been struggling with addiction for 6 years and in the recovery community for 4 of those years, so she was an addict -- not in recovery-- when he filed for divorce).

Lying about how she met her husband was also stupid. I just went back and re-read that post. "I can remember so many childhood camping trips in the Smokies where I’d spend hours exploring streams and trails, I truly loved it back then, so I figured maybe I could find the same joy in it now, which led to me joining a hiking group here in D.C. There was no way I could know that on that first hike on the Billy Goat Trail I would meet an amazing man..." Eeeeeeek. She should've just omitted how they met and focused on finding a good partner. This just makes her look fake and like she's willing to lie to get public opinion on her side.

Indeed. She has left a big part of the equation out of the end of her marriage and divorce. Oh he abused me, was a narcissist, controlling...but, I’ll not mention that I was addicted to pills, alcohol, whatever and possibly acted erratically a lot, even around the kids. She is telling a very one-sided story. Her addiction does not invalidate his actions at all, but he was not obligated to stay and be supportive of the path she was taking.

Kane, while divulging more on air than she should have, he should have said nothing, has been at the least classy enough to not mention her issues with substance abuse, since she clearly is embarrassed and ashamed. The couple divorcées that I know who divorced due to substance issues were vocal about their spouse’s issue.

Do you honestly think he, intern John, and/or the minions of the show didn't post any of that here? Come on, get real!

False equivalency. Nice try, though. Even if he did it here, he'd be doing it under anonymity, to much skepticism doing so, and to a MUCH smaller audience.

She could NEVER reach the audience he did with his crybaby antics on the radio. Nice try, though.

Do you even know what you said initially? Read it. You tried to deflect and say "you don't think any of them posted that here?" as a what-aboutism. Specifically eferring to this forum. You clearly weren't even talking about doing it elsewhere (the radio). Just quit while you're ahead...

[Anonymous]

If this thread was focused on the Kane show it would be deleted since that show doesn’t exist anymore. No one cares to discuss IJ/Rose/Riley’s new show because it’s boring. The interpersonal drama between Kane and Natasha was the only thing that ever interested DCUM. I don’t know why this thread isn’t locked since it’s breaking every rule Jeff set on the first page lol. Kane is now a former cast member, so he’s not supposed to be discussed. Natasha is the ex spouse of a former cast member, so she’s not supposed to be discussed... but here we are.

I’m interested to see if Natasha actually follows through and posts. If she’s going to be upfront about her addiction will she be honest about her new husband’s addiction since she’s laying it all out there about her ex husband? I can’t see what she has to benefit from all this beyond increased traffic to her blog. It also bothers me she’s blaming Kane for her addiction by saying he drove her to it as a coping mechanism... There are women who have been through so much worse than an OCD assh*le ex husband that didn’t become addicts. She needs to take accountability and responsibility for her addiction and I didn’t see that at all in her latest post.