
Did she respond to that comment? Someone ask her if she met her husband in rehab please, I’m too lazy to go on her blog |
No way that just having a vagina makes you automatically fair in situations like this. |
No. She’s only responded to people who’ve told their stories of an abusive partner. I’m curious if she’ll address this in a blog post. Frankly lots of people profit off of telling stories about their personal lives. For years Kane, and other radio hosts/TV hosts, tell stories about their personal lives. And we’ve had mommy bloggers for 20+ years and recently millennials took it up a notch by having mommy vloggers. Natasha telling her story is no diff then thousands that have come before her. I wouldn’t be comfortable doing what she does but I’m ok with her doing it because how is what she is doing different than say Elizabeth Vargas telling her addiction story? At least in Natasha’s case there are way less people that will know about the blog. |
Judges are only hearing essential items. Not this. |
I’m not on either side. I want Natasha to share her story because I like some messy tea - she can spout on and on about empowering women but most people just want the drama. I doubt she will share much, though. She’ll have second thoughts, a change of heart, blah blah blah and will continue to post teasers for years to come.
|
Omg this is so true. I'm shocked at how many here are trying to jump all over and discredit this woman who is clearly saying she's been troubled and suffered abuse. It's understandable she hasn't had the clearest head over the years. |
Same! |
Women are just as capable of reinforcing internalizes misogyny as men. In this scenario you have one man who has a common thread of (at least) 4 women and one man that he has had dramatic and public/semi public fallings out with. Personal and professional. And yet SO MUCH of the text in these kane show threads goes to trying to delegitimize the opinions of two of those women by picking their lives apart piece by piece. One of those women has a similar history of public dramas and is regularly excoriated and labeling her as a crazy person has become IMO, almost an accepted fact of the conversation. So why is the woman with the history of drama just flatly accepted as crazy and the man with the history of drama subject to post after post trying to defend him and cast doubt on his victims? Because he is a man. |
I’m a woman. I do not exonerate Kane. But since his initial talk about the divorce, he has said nothing except that he takes care of his daughters. Danni, up until recently has aired all her business making it easier for people to Pick her apart. Not to mention she has left none of it alone for years.
Natasha obviously has baggage. So does Kane. I’m certain there was abuse on both sides. I’m sure Natasha’s drug addiction was some of that. I’m sure Kane’s narcissism was another part of it. None are perfect. |
Since the talk about his divorce he lost two female cohosts, was fired for an as yet unknown reason and was accused of domestic assault. And he absolutely referenced Natasha again on the radio. Again with the whitewashing a man's drama and talking up a woman's. And I am not defending Danni, I agree she is a mess. Just don't understand why her male counterpart isn't also accepted as a mess by the masses. Oh wait, I do understand why. |
/\ I was wrong, Mel and Danni left before the divorce meltdown it sounds like from the wikipedia page. Regardless, drama follows him just as much as it does Danni. |
Wrong danni was fired shortly after the divorce announcement. Emphasis on FIRED. Danis husband didn’t cheat on her. She made the whole thing up. Slim wrote about it a few months ago on Instagram. Not sure if it’s still there |
Noooo way. Did she really make up the story about finding him cheating on her with a stripper?! Why would Slim stay quiet about that for so long if it wasn't true? |
Thanks for proving my point. |
Wait... What did slim say?! |