Trump found Guilty on all charges!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Bill Maher & Andrew Cuomo

So what? They are entitled to their opinion. Doesn’t mean they’re correct. Trump committed crimes and is not above the law. That’s it.

Other democracies hold corrupt politicians, including heads of government or state accountable. We’re not an autocracy yet. Enforcing laws is not a mistake.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Cuomo and Mahr sound a little nervous about the idea of people in the public eye being held accountable…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Cuomo and Mahr sound a little nervous about the idea of people in the public eye being held accountable…

Nah. The recognize a purely political prosecution when they see one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cuomo and Mahr sound a little nervous about the idea of people in the public eye being held accountable…

Nah. The recognize a purely political prosecution when they see one.

It's only political because Trump decided to run for president. Would the prosecutors still have charged him if he had retired to play golf full time? Of course they would have.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cuomo and Mahr sound a little nervous about the idea of people in the public eye being held accountable…

Nah. The recognize a purely political prosecution when they see one.

Trump actually did something wrong. You’re using words you don’t understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cuomo and Mahr sound a little nervous about the idea of people in the public eye being held accountable…

Nah. The recognize a purely political prosecution when they see one.

The crime was because he did it to run for office but that doesn’t make it “political prosecution “. You are allowed to pay your porn star mistress hush money so your wife doesn’t find out. But when you do it to run for office, it becomes a crime. The government can’t regulate deceiving your wife, but there are rules about campaigning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

[Anonymous]

Missouri says to New York: Not so fast. Why are you disenfranchising us?

MOTION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a) and this Court’s
Rule 17, the State of Missouri respectfully seeks leave
to file the accompanying Bill of Complaint against the
State of New York. Missouri seeks modest relief: a
stay of New York’s gag order and impending sentence
against Donald J. Trump during the 2024 Presidential
election season so Missourians can participate in the
election free from New York’s exercise of coercive
power limiting the ability of Trump to campaign.
As set forth in the accompanying brief and
complaint, the actions by New York have created
constitutional harms that threaten to infringe the
rights of Missouri’s voters and electors, namely:

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence unlawfully impede the ability of
electors to fulfill their federal functions.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the Purcell principle.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the First Amendment
rights of Missouri citizens to listen to the
campaign speech of a specific individual on
specific topics.

Missouri respectfully submits that the forgoing
violations establish considerable harms to voters and
electors in Missouri, who will be precluded from fully
engaging with and hearing from a major-party
Presidential candidate in the run up to the November
election. These harms are a direct consequence of
New York’s calculated, unprecedented decision to
prosecute Trump for alleged bookkeeping offenses just
months before the Presidential election.
This Court should grant leave to file the complaint
and stay any gag order or sentence against Trump
until after the November Presidential election.

July 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

ANDREW BAILEY
Missouri Attorney General

JOSHUA M. DIVINE
Solicitor General
Counsel of Record

OFFICE OF THE MISSOURI
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Supreme Court Building
207 West High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65102
[e-mail]
[phone]

https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/Missouri-v.-NY.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Missouri says to New York: Not so fast. Why are you disenfranchising us?

MOTION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a) and this Court’s
Rule 17, the State of Missouri respectfully seeks leave
to file the accompanying Bill of Complaint against the
State of New York. Missouri seeks modest relief: a
stay of New York’s gag order and impending sentence
against Donald J. Trump during the 2024 Presidential
election season so Missourians can participate in the
election free from New York’s exercise of coercive
power limiting the ability of Trump to campaign.
As set forth in the accompanying brief and
complaint, the actions by New York have created
constitutional harms that threaten to infringe the
rights of Missouri’s voters and electors, namely:

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence unlawfully impede the ability of
electors to fulfill their federal functions.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the Purcell principle.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the First Amendment
rights of Missouri citizens to listen to the
campaign speech of a specific individual on
specific topics.

Missouri respectfully submits that the forgoing
violations establish considerable harms to voters and
electors in Missouri, who will be precluded from fully
engaging with and hearing from a major-party
Presidential candidate in the run up to the November
election. These harms are a direct consequence of
New York’s calculated, unprecedented decision to
prosecute Trump for alleged bookkeeping offenses just
months before the Presidential election.
This Court should grant leave to file the complaint
and stay any gag order or sentence against Trump
until after the November Presidential election.

July 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

ANDREW BAILEY
Missouri Attorney General

JOSHUA M. DIVINE
Solicitor General
Counsel of Record

OFFICE OF THE MISSOURI
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Supreme Court Building
207 West High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65102
[e-mail]
[phone]

https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/Missouri-v.-NY.pdf

What? Missourans want to hear Trump attack the judge and his clerks and the jurors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Missouri says to New York: Not so fast. Why are you disenfranchising us?

MOTION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a) and this Court’s
Rule 17, the State of Missouri respectfully seeks leave
to file the accompanying Bill of Complaint against the
State of New York. Missouri seeks modest relief: a
stay of New York’s gag order and impending sentence
against Donald J. Trump during the 2024 Presidential
election season so Missourians can participate in the
election free from New York’s exercise of coercive
power limiting the ability of Trump to campaign.
As set forth in the accompanying brief and
complaint, the actions by New York have created
constitutional harms that threaten to infringe the
rights of Missouri’s voters and electors, namely:

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence unlawfully impede the ability of
electors to fulfill their federal functions.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the Purcell principle.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the First Amendment
rights of Missouri citizens to listen to the
campaign speech of a specific individual on
specific topics.

Missouri respectfully submits that the forgoing
violations establish considerable harms to voters and
electors in Missouri, who will be precluded from fully
engaging with and hearing from a major-party
Presidential candidate in the run up to the November
election. These harms are a direct consequence of
New York’s calculated, unprecedented decision to
prosecute Trump for alleged bookkeeping offenses just
months before the Presidential election.
This Court should grant leave to file the complaint
and stay any gag order or sentence against Trump
until after the November Presidential election.

July 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

ANDREW BAILEY
Missouri Attorney General

JOSHUA M. DIVINE
Solicitor General
Counsel of Record

OFFICE OF THE MISSOURI
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Supreme Court Building
207 West High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65102
[e-mail]
[phone]

https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/Missouri-v.-NY.pdf

If you needed any more proof that MAGAs are completely insane….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Missouri says to New York: Not so fast. Why are you disenfranchising us?

MOTION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a) and this Court’s
Rule 17, the State of Missouri respectfully seeks leave
to file the accompanying Bill of Complaint against the
State of New York. Missouri seeks modest relief: a
stay of New York’s gag order and impending sentence
against Donald J. Trump during the 2024 Presidential
election season so Missourians can participate in the
election free from New York’s exercise of coercive
power limiting the ability of Trump to campaign.
As set forth in the accompanying brief and
complaint, the actions by New York have created
constitutional harms that threaten to infringe the
rights of Missouri’s voters and electors, namely:

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence unlawfully impede the ability of
electors to fulfill their federal functions.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the Purcell principle.

- New York’s gag order and impending
sentence violate the First Amendment
rights of Missouri citizens to listen to the
campaign speech of a specific individual on
specific topics.

Missouri respectfully submits that the forgoing
violations establish considerable harms to voters and
electors in Missouri, who will be precluded from fully
engaging with and hearing from a major-party
Presidential candidate in the run up to the November
election. These harms are a direct consequence of
New York’s calculated, unprecedented decision to
prosecute Trump for alleged bookkeeping offenses just
months before the Presidential election.
This Court should grant leave to file the complaint
and stay any gag order or sentence against Trump
until after the November Presidential election.

July 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

ANDREW BAILEY
Missouri Attorney General

JOSHUA M. DIVINE
Solicitor General
Counsel of Record

OFFICE OF THE MISSOURI
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Supreme Court Building
207 West High Street
Jefferson City, MO 65102
[e-mail]
[phone]

https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/Missouri-v.-NY.pdf

If you needed any more proof that MAGAs are completely insane….

Exactly. “We need to hear Trump threaten the judge and the jury or we can’t make up our minds!” is nuts.

[Anonymous]

Other states know it's not a legit case.

New York can play games and the DNC can import the number three at the DOJ, Michael Colangelo, to prosecute their top political rival.

These are Soviet style show trials. SCOTUS will probably schwack the whole case altogether.

[Anonymous]

These convictions will be overturned by the court because of issues with due process. Convicting someone of a crime without specifically identifying what the underlying misconduct was is not legal. Merchan told the jury that they did not need to make a unanimous agreement on which component of his conduct they found him guilty on. It will be overturned. I don’t like Trump and won’t vote for him, but the conviction is likely invalid also uses and untested legal theory that poses constitutional questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These convictions will be overturned by the court because of issues with due process. Convicting someone of a crime without specifically identifying what the underlying misconduct was is not legal. Merchan told the jury that they did not need to make a unanimous agreement on which component of his conduct they found him guilty on. It will be overturned. I don’t like Trump and won’t vote for him, but the conviction is likely invalid also uses and untested legal theory that poses constitutional questions.

No, it's all normal and common. These aren't unusual charges or convictions. The only unusual part is that Trump finally got caught.