Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Christmas card released and everyone up in arms. LOL. I don’t know his to embed but the tweets are cray cray!

They demand to see the child. LOL.

My only question is why are people still wearing tall boots in Cali? Takes awhile for west coast to drop bad fashion trend?

Tall boots aren’t a trend. They’ve been around forever.

Bottom line. Card is fine. Tall boats are very outdated.

Bottom line. You have no idea that knee high boots are very much still in style.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I find it in poor taste/cruel to write the NYT miscarriage column, and then make a televised appearance and this casual appearance, where she is obviously pregnant, without saying anything.

She is either knowingly encouraging a bump watch, or doesn't realize that she is. Either way, it is painful for women who have suffered miscarriages, especially recently, who are not also pregnant again if they'd like to be.

She is entitled to keep her reproductive and family life a secret, but to only share the sad part seems like another form of self-pomotion/cluelessness.

This is what I’ve been saying! She didn’t write about it for awareness, she wrote about it for publicity, and now when she announces her pregnancy, it will be much bigger news than if she hadn’t mentioned it at all. This woman is all about making money. Everything she does is for her bottom line and to keep herself in the news.

[Anonymous]

Something less than $14 million. Typical that MM listed the charities she donated to. She’s Mother Theresa and Dalai Lama wrapped in trendy knee length boots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something less than $14 million. Typical that MM listed the charities she donated to. She’s Mother Theresa and Dalai Lama wrapped in trendy knee length boots.

How much? $200k? $70k? $3mil? How much was your house? Or does it not matter bc you aren’t involved in charity anyway? Thought the boots were outdated 🤔

[Anonymous]

Why was she wearing a coat and hat to walk around so cal? hours from her house? Must have heard there were photographers there. She thought the outfit showcased her bump subtly

[Anonymous]

Imagine being this obsessed with some random woman’s tall boots.

[Anonymous]

Imagine being this obsessed with some random woman.

[Anonymous]

She doesn’t seem like a humanitarian to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:



She's obviously pregnant again.

Also merching that J Crew coat.

That coat looks incredibly hot to be wearing in CA!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it in poor taste/cruel to write the NYT miscarriage column, and then make a televised appearance and this casual appearance, where she is obviously pregnant, without saying anything.

She is either knowingly encouraging a bump watch, or doesn't realize that she is. Either way, it is painful for women who have suffered miscarriages, especially recently, who are not also pregnant again if they'd like to be.

She is entitled to keep her reproductive and family life a secret, but to only share the sad part seems like another form of self-pomotion/cluelessness.

This is what I’ve been saying! She didn’t write about it for awareness, she wrote about it for publicity, and now when she announces her pregnancy, it will be much bigger news than if she hadn’t mentioned it at all. This woman is all about making money. Everything she does is for her bottom line and to keep herself in the news.

How Machiavellian you make her sound.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I find it in poor taste/cruel to write the NYT miscarriage column, and then make a televised appearance and this casual appearance, where she is obviously pregnant, without saying anything.

She is either knowingly encouraging a bump watch, or doesn't realize that she is. Either way, it is painful for women who have suffered miscarriages, especially recently, who are not also pregnant again if they'd like to be.

She is entitled to keep her reproductive and family life a secret, but to only share the sad part seems like another form of self-pomotion/cluelessness.

Seriously? So she had a miscarriage and spoke about..in her own time. So if she is pregnant now and don’t disclose..until she is ready to do so...she is cruel?

They'll say that she a master manipulator and is trying to garner attention for herself.

[Anonymous]

I prefer McKenzie Bezos actually giving billions to the hungry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:



She's obviously pregnant again.

Also merching that J Crew coat.

That coat looks incredibly hot to be wearing in CA!?

It's cold here right now. I'm wearing heavier coats than that now and I am not too far north of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:



She's obviously pregnant again.

Also merching that J Crew coat.

That coat looks incredibly hot to be wearing in CA!?

It's cold here right now. I'm wearing heavier coats than that now and I am not too far north of them.

Not sure where you live but it can’t be anywhere close to LA or SB. This picture was taken Sunday when it was 80 degrees. We went to the beach. My kids were in swim trunks all day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:



She's obviously pregnant again.

Also merching that J Crew coat.

That coat looks incredibly hot to be wearing in CA!?

It's cold here right now. I'm wearing heavier coats than that now and I am not too far north of them.

Not sure where you live but it can’t be anywhere close to LA or SB. This picture was taken Sunday when it was 80 degrees. We went to the beach. My kids were in swim trunks all day.

When and where was this picture taken?