Indictment Monday?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Merchan appears to agree with defense that Cohen is a proven liar that lied on the stand, and that the prosecution has not connected Trump to any falsification of business records, but says he will reserve judgment on case dismissal until tomorrow morning.

Source? I thought the judge was simply asking defense counsel what he wanted him to do, namely, to discount Cohen's testimony and grant a directed verdict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Merchan appears to agree with defense that Cohen is a proven liar that lied on the stand, and that the prosecution has not connected Trump to any falsification of business records, but says he will reserve judgment on case dismissal until tomorrow morning.

Keep dreaming skippy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Judge Merchan appears to agree with defense that Cohen is a proven liar that lied on the stand, and that the prosecution has not connected Trump to any falsification of business records, but says he will reserve judgment on case dismissal until tomorrow morning.

It’s not going to be dismissed tomorrow. The jury decides the facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“The moment Michael Cohen said he is considering a bid for Congress
Trump's former fixer Michael Cohen admitted from the witness stand that he is considering a run for Congress.

The moment came during cross-examination on Monday.

'Going after President Trump, that's your name recognition?' Trump attorney Todd Blanche asked.

'My name recognition is because of the journey I've been on,' Cohen responded. 'It is affiliated with Mr. Trump, yes, not because of Mr. Trump.'

Blanche asked if the journey includes 'nearly daily attacks on President Trump?'

'Yes sir,' Cohen eventually said.”

Cohen would have been the perfect democrat for Congress. He would have fit right in.

Cohen was asked if he had a financial interest in the outcome of this trial, and he responded "Yes". Can someone explain what does that mean? Was he promised a position in DNC if Trump is convicted? Is he getting paid for testifying against Trump? I've never heard anyone to say that they have financial interest in the outcome of criminal trial. Civil - yes, but criminal?

Are Republicans congenitally unable to face facts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Merchan appears to agree with defense that Cohen is a proven liar that lied on the stand, and that the prosecution has not connected Trump to any falsification of business records, but says he will reserve judgment on case dismissal until tomorrow morning.

It’s not going to be dismissed tomorrow. The jury decides the facts.

Judge has to rule tomorrow on defense's motion to strike. If he grants it, the case will be dismissed tomorrow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“The moment Michael Cohen said he is considering a bid for Congress
Trump's former fixer Michael Cohen admitted from the witness stand that he is considering a run for Congress.

The moment came during cross-examination on Monday.

'Going after President Trump, that's your name recognition?' Trump attorney Todd Blanche asked.

'My name recognition is because of the journey I've been on,' Cohen responded. 'It is affiliated with Mr. Trump, yes, not because of Mr. Trump.'

Blanche asked if the journey includes 'nearly daily attacks on President Trump?'

'Yes sir,' Cohen eventually said.”

Cohen would have been the perfect democrat for Congress. He would have fit right in.

Cohen was asked if he had a financial interest in the outcome of this trial, and he responded "Yes". Can someone explain what does that mean? Was he promised a position in DNC if Trump is convicted? Is he getting paid for testifying against Trump? I've never heard anyone to say that they have financial interest in the outcome of criminal trial. Civil - yes, but criminal?

Are Republicans congenitally unable to face facts?

That makes no sense. Why would innocent Trump give more talking point than guilty Trump?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Merchan appears to agree with defense that Cohen is a proven liar that lied on the stand, and that the prosecution has not connected Trump to any falsification of business records, but says he will reserve judgment on case dismissal until tomorrow morning.

It’s not going to be dismissed tomorrow. The jury decides the facts.

Judge has to rule tomorrow on defense's motion to strike. If he grants it, the case will be dismissed tomorrow.

Motion to strike? What?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. And Trump will appeal because the court was too cold for his fragile bones anyway.

If the jury has been paying attention there will be no need for an appeal. Bragg and company have not identified a crime. In fact the one crimes we have heard about are those committed by Cohen. Including embezzlement

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“The moment Michael Cohen said he is considering a bid for Congress
Trump's former fixer Michael Cohen admitted from the witness stand that he is considering a run for Congress.

The moment came during cross-examination on Monday.

'Going after President Trump, that's your name recognition?' Trump attorney Todd Blanche asked.

'My name recognition is because of the journey I've been on,' Cohen responded. 'It is affiliated with Mr. Trump, yes, not because of Mr. Trump.'

Blanche asked if the journey includes 'nearly daily attacks on President Trump?'

'Yes sir,' Cohen eventually said.”

Cohen would have been the perfect democrat for Congress. He would have fit right in.

Cohen was asked if he had a financial interest in the outcome of this trial, and he responded "Yes". Can someone explain what does that mean? Was he promised a position in DNC if Trump is convicted? Is he getting paid for testifying against Trump? I've never heard anyone to say that they have financial interest in the outcome of criminal trial. Civil - yes, but criminal?

Are Republicans congenitally unable to face facts?

Yes. Their reading comprehension does not meet expectations for a third grader.

It’s also very weird how they missed that merchan’s ire today was directed at the defense witness, Costello.

[Anonymous]

Did Bragg pass on a felony charge on his own witness to go after a misdemeanor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did Bragg pass on a felony charge on his own witness to go after a misdemeanor?

Trump was charged with felonies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did Bragg pass on a felony charge on his own witness to go after a misdemeanor?

I seem to recall reading an article indicating that the embezzlement (or grand theft?) statute of limitations expired, which is why Cohen admitted his actions on the stand. While Bragg could have found a way to resurrect those charges, he wouldn't have Cohen as a witness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge is a piece of work.

He will not allow testimony from a former FEC chairman about what constitutes campaign contributions but he will allow testimony from a felon and serial liar about what is a legal NDA.

Yet another ground for appeal.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. And Trump will appeal because the court was too cold for his fragile bones anyway.

If the jury has been paying attention there will be no need for an appeal. Bragg and company have not identified a crime. In fact the one crimes we have heard about are those committed by Cohen. Including embezzlement

Exactly.

Cohen is not on trial for embezzlement. Is he,? The very fact that he admitted to embezzling from Trump would prove not me that he is not lying in his testimony in this case. And, as I am just one of the anonymous hoi polloi like the jurors, it's safe to bet that some of them feel the same!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Merchan appears to agree with defense that Cohen is a proven liar that lied on the stand, and that the prosecution has not connected Trump to any falsification of business records, but says he will reserve judgment on case dismissal until tomorrow morning.

It’s not going to be dismissed tomorrow. The jury decides the facts.

Judge has to rule tomorrow on defense's motion to strike. If he grants it, the case will be dismissed tomorrow.

Motion to strike? What?

This is someone summarizing the kind of BS faux-lawyer rhetoric taking place in the right wing media ecosystem.

[Anonymous]

Trump refuses to testify in his own behalf, so the defense has rested. The jury is excused until Tuesday next week and the attorneys and judge will hash out legal issues between now and then.