Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any truth to the rumors they are waiting for the quarantine to end before separating?

Nope. But maybe you should take heed to the fact that the other couple slept in separate beds on the train and the media is now publicly putting two-and-two together. Hard to hide an affair the world knows about.

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2020/12/blind-items-revealed-5_14.html

https://people.com/royals/why-kate-middleton-and-prince-william-are-sleeping-in-separate-beds-on-royal-train-tour/?amp=true

The train appears to only have twin beds. I think this is inconclusive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any truth to the rumors they are waiting for the quarantine to end before separating?

Nope. But maybe you should take heed to the fact that the other couple slept in separate beds on the train and the media is now publicly putting two-and-two together. Hard to hide an affair the world knows about.

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2020/12/blind-items-revealed-5_14.html

https://people.com/royals/why-kate-middleton-and-prince-william-are-sleeping-in-separate-beds-on-royal-train-tour/?amp=true

The train appears to only have twin beds. I think this is inconclusive.

That is the Queen's private train which she uses for day-and-overnight trips. If you think the Queen of the United Kingdom or the Prince of Wales (the man legendary for taking his own feather mattress on trips abroad) was sleeping in a twin bed - I have a bridge to sell you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who dislikes Kristen Bell?

PP. A lot of people hate that she’s an oversharer. I don’t listen to her podcast/really follow her but I liked her in Veronica Mars and forgetting Sarah Marshall.

I enjoy her on The Good Place. She actually has acting and singing chops, unlike MM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give them 2 years and they'll be has-beens. Neither of them is talented. Titles can only take you so far.

You’re new here I see. People said the same thing about their popularity in 2018. Now they have their own production studios, write for the New York Times and who knows what else. I suspect they’ll both be speaking before the UN before 2022 is out.

An op-ed is not "write for the new york times", lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Terrible photos. I wish she'd wear her hair naturally, I bet she'd look so pretty with curls instead of her awful flat ironed severe look.

Which, as a POC, seems the ultimate in sanctimony. Lecture the world on their mistreatment of brown people but then confirm to the beauty norms of white people. Meghan wants to have her cake and eat it too.

What are you going on about? The beauty of POC hair is its versatility...Meghan can wear her hair however she wants, straight or curly, and still speak to the mistreatment of black and brown people.

+ a billion

stop oppressing people of color!!

I'm the one who made the comment about her hair. I don't care what the hell she talks about, I just think her current hairstyle is ugly and think she'd look better with hair that has some volume. Chill out people!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Terrible photos. I wish she'd wear her hair naturally, I bet she'd look so pretty with curls instead of her awful flat ironed severe look.

Which, as a POC, seems the ultimate in sanctimony. Lecture the world on their mistreatment of brown people but then confirm to the beauty norms of white people. Meghan wants to have her cake and eat it too.

What are you going on about? The beauty of POC hair is its versatility...Meghan can wear her hair however she wants, straight or curly, and still speak to the mistreatment of black and brown people.

+ a billion

stop oppressing people of color!!

I'm the one who made the comment about her hair. I don't care what the hell she talks about, I just think her current hairstyle is ugly and think she'd look better with hair that has some volume. Chill out people!

Read your post again and see if what you are now claiming you meant is what you actually said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Give them 2 years and they'll be has-beens. Neither of them is talented. Titles can only take you so far.

You’re new here I see. People said the same thing about their popularity in 2018. Now they have their own production studios, write for the New York Times and who knows what else. I suspect they’ll both be speaking before the UN before 2022 is out.

An op-ed is not "write for the new york times", lol

Maureen Dowd did not have her regular column in the NYT last week and my DH and I laughed that she was probably being replaced by Sparkle Markle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Terrible photos. I wish she'd wear her hair naturally, I bet she'd look so pretty with curls instead of her awful flat ironed severe look.

Which, as a POC, seems the ultimate in sanctimony. Lecture the world on their mistreatment of brown people but then confirm to the beauty norms of white people. Meghan wants to have her cake and eat it too.

What are you going on about? The beauty of POC hair is its versatility...Meghan can wear her hair however she wants, straight or curly, and still speak to the mistreatment of black and brown people.

+ a billion

stop oppressing people of color!!

I'm the one who made the comment about her hair. I don't care what the hell she talks about, I just think her current hairstyle is ugly and think she'd look better with hair that has some volume. Chill out people!

Read your post again and see if what you are now claiming you meant is what you actually said.

I know what I meant, you're reading too much into it.

I wrote: I wish she'd wear her hair naturally, I bet she'd look so pretty with curls instead of her awful flat ironed severe look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They seem to have little to no direction in life. They're royals, they're not royals, they're starting a foundation, they're actors, they're producers, they're starting a podcast? I'm not interested.

Their direction in life is make money.

I'd say more specifically their 'direction' is desperation. She's so thirsty, which honestly calls into question their supposed net worth. I do not believe those Netflix or Spotify numbers - no way, no how. Nobody that just received $50 or 100 million in cash (or anywhere near those sums) acts like this. They are clearly hard up for revenue, fame and relevancy.

[Anonymous]

In those new photos she looks quite puffy in the face. Is she pregnant again or is she putting on kilos during lockdown? If latter, that actually makes her relatable.

[Anonymous]

Not this photo, but the one of her and Harry out and about in LA, makes me think that she is pregnant again.

[Anonymous]

She's obviously pregnant again.

Also merching that J Crew coat.

[Anonymous]

Yep baby on board

[Anonymous]

I'm surprised at her being fertile at 39-40.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm surprised at her being fertile at 39-40.

Please don't derail this again with the geriatric mom BS. It's perfectly normal for women of that age to have kids now. It's not a medical miracle.