How, exactly, does gay marriage threaten me?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who know God would not want to die in the act of sodomy. And that goes for the vast majority of people who may tolerate gay marriage as well. Nobody with any brains would want to take that chance.

I don't want to die in the middle of intercourse of any sort. What exactly is your point?

Actually, compared to a plane crash or a real bad case of EColi, it wouldn't be a bad way to go.

I'm sure it would feel good and then.....OMG....That wasn't worth it....HHHHEEEEELLLLLPPPPP.....lol.

Look at yourself. You are actually laughing about death. You have gone astray. Repent. You have been warned. No pleading ignorance on judgment day.

[Anonymous]

you are right . It would be a tragedy for a homosexual to die in the middle of an act of sodomy. I don't think God would let that happen...he always wants to give people a lot of chances to repent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:you are right . It would be a tragedy for a homosexual to die in the middle of an act of sodomy. I don't think God would let that happen...he always wants to give people a lot of chances to repent.

Keep yucking it up. Don't be surprised where you land because of it.

What are you going to tell God on your judgment day, when he asks if you are really that hateful? You'll say "I didn't hate them, I hated their sins". He's going to say "try again". You're going to say "I didn't really mean it". He's going to say "I can see into your heart". Then what will you come up with when everything is on the line. You are going to nervously crack another gay joke, because that's all you have, and that's the end of you.

Don't say you weren't warned. The commandment is love. Love God. Love your neighbors. Love your enemies.

[Anonymous]

What commandment says to love sodomy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What commandment says to love sodomy.

Seriously, you are mocking God's law. Amazing. You are such a hypocrite.

[Anonymous]

God's not real. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:God's not real. Deal with it.

That's why gays should be happy with civil unions. "marriage" has a religious history and affiliation with should be of no interest to gays since God is not real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God's not real. Deal with it.

That's why gays should be happy with civil unions. "marriage" has a religious history and affiliation with should be of no interest to gays since God is not real.

Then marriage should likewise be of no interest to heterosexuals, if God is not real. Or are you saying God is real only to heterosexuals? I'm having a really hard time following your twisted logic.

[Anonymous]

I'm saying it is offensive to religious people for the word "marriage" to be associated with a relationship built around sodomy, thats all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm saying it is offensive to religious people for the word "marriage" to be associated with a relationship built around sodomy, thats all.

Great, so if you care to fix this, then you should push for a change in laws that gives gay people equal rights without using the word marriage. If you don't want to do that, then the rest of us will fix it in a way that we prefer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm saying it is offensive to religious people for the word "marriage" to be associated with a relationship built around sodomy, thats all.

You do not speak for "religious people.". You speak only for yourself. I, for one, do not share your beliefs, and I promise you that I am a religious person.

As a heterosexual married woman, would you define my relationship with my husband as built around vaginal sex? I must say, if asked to describe what my marriage is built around, I'd identify love, mutual support and consideration, kindness, and collaboration as the defining characteristics. Your fixation with sex as the defining element of a relationship is quite telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God's not real. Deal with it.

That's why gays should be happy with civil unions. "marriage" has a religious history and affiliation with should be of no interest to gays since God is not real.

So the government shouldn't be in the marriage business in the first place? Especially seeing as how we have a secular government? Great! We're on the same page. I fully expect to see you leading the charge to eliminate legal marriages for all!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:God's not real. Deal with it.

That's why gays should be happy with civil unions. "marriage" has a religious history and affiliation with should be of no interest to gays since God is not real.

Ten years ago, that would have worked. But people like you made sure that civil unions were not equal to marriage under the law. You screwed yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm saying it is offensive to religious people for the word "marriage" to be associated with a relationship built around sodomy, thats all.

You do not speak for "religious people.". You speak only for yourself. I, for one, do not share your beliefs, and I promise you that I am a religious person.

As a heterosexual married woman, would you define my relationship with my husband as built around vaginal sex? I must say, if asked to describe what my marriage is built around, I'd identify love, mutual support and consideration, kindness, and collaboration as the defining characteristics. Your fixation with sex as the defining element of a relationship is quite telling.

You could have "love, mutual support and consideration, kindness, and collaboration" with any number of people e.g. your brother, sister, father, mother, a friend. You don't have sex vaginal sex with them. If you think that vaginal sex wasn't a big draw for your husband, think again. Just ask him. Would he have married you if you were sworn to celibacy? You are his wife not his roommate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm saying it is offensive to religious people for the word "marriage" to be associated with a relationship built around sodomy, thats all.

You do not speak for "religious people.". You speak only for yourself. I, for one, do not share your beliefs, and I promise you that I am a religious person.

As a heterosexual married woman, would you define my relationship with my husband as built around vaginal sex? I must say, if asked to describe what my marriage is built around, I'd identify love, mutual support and consideration, kindness, and collaboration as the defining characteristics. Your fixation with sex as the defining element of a relationship is quite telling.

You could have "love, mutual support and consideration, kindness, and collaboration" with any number of people e.g. your brother, sister, father, mother, a friend. You don't have sex vaginal sex with them. If you think that vaginal sex wasn't a big draw for your husband, think again. Just ask him. Would he have married you if you were sworn to celibacy? You are his wife not his roommate.

In case you didn't notice, you can get sex with just about anyone, too.