GA & MLS NEXT Form Strategic Alliance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.

I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.

Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.

Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So after reading the comments on fb and ig here is what I’m seeing.

Comments that are saying this is no different than the alliance they claimed to have in 2020.

Comments from ecnl parents that seem worried that mls/mlsn/ga are coming for ecnl girls.

Comments that are saying that only the 48 clubs with both ga/mls next will benefit from this alliance — putting clubs with ecnl/MLS next in a tough spot.

All in all, it appears that a good bunch of people fear that ecnl is now at some what of a risk, or at least ecnl parents are now a bit worried.

This alliance news has now gotten more attention than when ga received full sponsorship from us soccer.

Imagine mls next making clubs shift from ecnl to ga and imagine ga making clubs with boys ecnl to go mls next.

GA clubs are going to be attending MLS Next events. What do you think the chances are that MLS Next events will be BY?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.

I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.

Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.

Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?

This is all you ever say.

It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The only way to counter this is for ECNL to once and for all accept the last 5-10 big clubs from GA. If they don’t do this in 25/26…things can go very very south.

ECNL could have done this for several years and chose not to.

As soon as one girls ECNL trades for MLSN and GA the floodgates will open.

[Anonymous]

And remember - Adidas has a hand in both GA and MLS Next…This may be the beginning of the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only way to counter this is for ECNL to once and for all accept the last 5-10 big clubs from GA. If they don’t do this in 25/26…things can go very very south.

ECNL could have done this for several years and chose not to.

As soon as one girls ECNL trades for MLSN and GA the floodgates will open.

Yup… all it takes is for one.

All it takes is for one club like FC Delco with a very strong MLS Next program to fall.

[Anonymous]

ECNL Parents right now waiting for a podcast.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.

I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.

Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.

Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?

This is all you ever say.

It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.

If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.

Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.

I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.

I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.

Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.

Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?

This is all you ever say.

It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.

If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.

Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.

I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.

I have a feeling there's a reason you don't run a soccer league. Sports might not be your thing. Maybe try accounting.

[Anonymous]

ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec

This is because ECNL sits at the kiddy table. US Club Soccer + GA sit with the adults. Let that sink in...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec

Kang does not have tons of money! This will not be a new hit every year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ECNL didn’t repost/share the news about Kang’s investment…The GA did…..let that sink in for a sec

Reposting means what to you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.

I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.

Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.

Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?

This is all you ever say.

It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.

If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.

Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.

I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.

I have a feeling there's a reason you don't run a soccer league. Sports might not be your thing. Maybe try accounting.

Fyi, this is not a winning Shark Tank argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA>ECNL. GA forever.

I'll take Acadamies over pay to play.

Hopefully this is the direction GA is looking to go.

Sure, everybody wants someone else to pay their way but where would GA get the money to offer free soccer to thousands of girls?

This is all you ever say.

It's going to be fun watching to come to grips with the reality going on around you.

If the barrier to GA offering free soccer like MLS Academies is money, focus on what would solve the barrier and don't just dream it away.

Kang's $30 million over 5 years is going to USSF to fund what they should have already funded, not to start an NWSL Next or give cash to an endowment fund for GA or ECNL.

I'm not pro or anti GA or ECNL but if some wants a catalyst for change, it's going to cost money.

I have a feeling there's a reason you don't run a soccer league. Sports might not be your thing. Maybe try accounting.

Fyi, this is not a winning Shark Tank argument.

See. accountant. You don't even realize your calling.