I have no issues with a parent coach; however, the fees should reflect this and those kids should pay less. |
That doesn’t make any sense. |
Sure it does. If you aren’t a “professional coach”, you shouldn’t get paid like one. If you are a parent and also a “professional coach”, you should get paid like one. A random parent would be the former and fees should reflect it. |
| Valor charges the same high fee regardless of the coach |
| FCV advertising for a GA coach - looking to hire immediately |
| So now VDA, Loudoun and FCV have coaching positions available. Yikes. |
Yes. And guess which club doesn't? The BRAVE!! Jump on board!!! |
Wonder which pays the most? That is all that is going to matter to possible hires because each of these clubs has successful teams. |
Loudoun then FCV then VDA. |
FCV and Loudoun are more attractive jobs than VDA. Vda does not have the talent. |
Problem with VDA is half of the program wants to play reasonably skilled possession football (QP & PWSI) and the other half wants to play trash, concussion ball (ML & VSA). |
| PWSI's 2011 team was better than the VSA 2011 prior to becoming VDA yet they couldn't keep the majority of it together. Probably due to something like that clash of ideologies. |
There are 9 PWSI players on VDA 2011. |
That is completely untrue in regards to random parents coaching. Valors main issue is Ellis has not set any standard or expectations in the coaches. Meaning if a new coach takes over a new age group its like a reset. Training is not consistent, and game management is even worse. The club should have a uniform approach for development and playing style. The CYA merger really killed the progress SYA made. |
Ditto for Loudoun and MR. The revolving door of coaches has become quite the clusterf&ck. |