+1 |
|
Many teachers are incompetent, but are protected.
We need an effective merit system and competency testing to get rid of the bad teachers. |
The professions that I can think of that have the harshest weed out periods early career are also the best paid. Are you willing to pay teachers like Goldman Sachs pays its associates? Should a middle school teacher who has made it through your testing be paid like lawyer who has made it through to partner? |
Goldman Sach’s HR strategies doesn’t solve DC school problems. PP was correct. Poor teachers should be weeded out. Similarly, toxic parents should be managed such that they can’t derail classes. The administration should focus on hiring and retaining good teachers and working with collaborative, invested parents. That’s the only way to make progress for these kids, whose futures should be what’s at stake |
Also no testing. The bottom line should be “do you care?” There’s no test that can measure that. Teachers that don’t care should move into professions they do care about. No more pointless paperwork |
About the pointless paperwork - teachers, is it mostly data gathering or special ed paperwork that takes so much time? |
And replaced with what? Places that weed out can do so because the pay enough to hire far more people than they can retain 7 years down the line. Everyone involved knows it, but the pay makes the risk worthwhile. |
Replaced with good teachers. Good teachers should be paid enough to attract and retain them |
No. I’ve met plenty of ineffective and inefficient teachers who really do care. No other job gets paid for “caring”. Most workers get paid for results and need to show evidence thereof. |
The thing is, those aren't just for the teacher. The teacher has X number of students using whatever is brought in. You buy what you need for the office, but do you also buy things for 25 other people? That's what really got to me with DH teaching. We would send our own kids with their supplies, plus extra when needed. Dh was also buying supplies for his students. It had to stop, we couldn't afford it. |
Strawman argument. Incompetent teachers should not be teaching, nor paid for work they are unqualified to do. |
|
What's unique about teachers is the endless whining. Sure, some jobs are better and others are worse, but you don't hear those other professionals comp!ain as much. Only teachers always whine about how they're the biggest victims of them all. |
Well, count me as another “victim” who will be quitting because of the workload. I’ll be following the dozen who quit last year, mostly because of the work load. At some point, the nation will have to evaluate how we treat teachers. Now I’m off to work. It’s Saturday and I’ll be at it most of the day. |
I don't see people on here questioning how others do their jobs. My lawyer did (or didn't do) X, Y, Z. Would you report them? My doctor missed this many days of work. I want to know why. Etc. However, I do think teachers need to quit trying to explain their job. Just stop. People outside of the profession don't understand your job. They don't need to, either. I see someone posted about their Saturday, working. So go do that if you NEED to. My partner won't be. Could they be marking? Sure. Always. We have family plans though so the job will wait. Nobody is going to die if the papers are given back later next week. Parents will complain - that's nothing new. Oh well. Advocate for a better situation for your child: Smaller classes, less of the teacher's time expected to be spent on whatever meeting someone called. Hire appropriate supports for students who need them. Etc. |