GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Willis is disqualified from prosecution due to conflict of interest then that disqualifies Clarence Thomas from hearing any further SCOTUS cases. For him to continue would be a complete travesty.

This thread is about GA and Willis and Wade and whether they can continue on this case.
Thanks for playing.

DP. I mean, no. The thread is actually about the case against Trump and others interfering in the Georgia election. The silliness about Willis's inappropriate office affair is only a small part of the thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honest question: Fanni and Wade are so incompetent why would defs want to disqualify them? I've practice law for 30 years and encountered thousands and thousands of attorneys. If I had to pick 2 lawyers who would prosecute me for RICO, I would pick Wade and Willis in a nano second. Guarantee any replacement lawyers will be order of magnitude better than Wade and willis.

True. However, the point is to delay since it is unlikely the case will be dismissed. it is more likely Fani and Wade will be disqualified (among other things) and thus the trial date will then be pushed to after the election date. This is obvious I don't need to remind you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Willis is disqualified from prosecution due to conflict of interest then that disqualifies Clarence Thomas from hearing any further SCOTUS cases. For him to continue would be a complete travesty.

This thread is about GA and Willis and Wade and whether they can continue on this case.
Thanks for playing.

DP. I mean, no. The thread is actually about the case against Trump and others interfering in the Georgia election. The silliness about Willis's inappropriate office affair is only a small part of the thread.

Willis' behavior and alleged lying have everything to do with this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The way that judge (who worked for Fani for several years before assuming the bench) bent over backwards to accommodate Fani.

Based on my decades of legal experience, any judge other than this Judge in this Hearing would not have tolerated Fani's outbursts and disrespect she displayed for everybody including the Court.

This judge can have some backbone if he wants to: He immediately warned someone that he will have to step out if it happened again after someone was heard laughing when Wade said he received cash.

Basically, this judge let Fani come in unannounced, neither party had called Fani as a witness yet since they were still arguing the attorney-client privilege issue, the judge had NOT yet ruled on the issue and Fani just sat at the witness seat not even giving the Court an opportunity to rule which is highly disrespectful to the Court.

Any other judge would have given Fani 1 stern warning that she would be found in contempt of the Court if it (accusatory tone, hostility, outbursts, speeches etc.) happened again and then the 2nd time Fani disrupts or have another outbursts, she will be sitting in County lockup.

That judge was in Fani's pocket. No other explanation for how the Judge acted when Fani just walked in and took total control and took over the Courtroom.

Any attorney knows that all judges make it absolutely clear who is in control over the courtroom and the judges take it very seriously and even personally if they perceive any disrespect towards the Court and sanctions will fly.

[Anonymous]

I think that judge was afraid that Fani would start looking for something to charge him with (you (prosecutor) look HARD at someone, it is likely you would find something) since Fani will still be the DA of Fulton County until January of 2025 at least.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question: Fanni and Wade are so incompetent why would defs want to disqualify them? I've practice law for 30 years and encountered thousands and thousands of attorneys. If I had to pick 2 lawyers who would prosecute me for RICO, I would pick Wade and Willis in a nano second. Guarantee any replacement lawyers will be order of magnitude better than Wade and willis.

True. However, the point is to delay since it is unlikely the case will be dismissed. it is more likely Fani and Wade will be disqualified (among other things) and thus the trial date will then be pushed to after the election date. This is obvious I don't need to remind you.

They really want to get it moved out of Fulton County where they feel they can get a more right leaning jury pool. Fulton County is a heavily Dem County. It's not just about a delay.

[Anonymous]

That Judge should be sanctioned by the Georgia Judicial Commission on Ethics for behaving the way he did and possibly violating one or more of the Rules of the Judicial Conduct.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honest question: Fanni and Wade are so incompetent why would defs want to disqualify them? I've practice law for 30 years and encountered thousands and thousands of attorneys. If I had to pick 2 lawyers who would prosecute me for RICO, I would pick Wade and Willis in a nano second. Guarantee any replacement lawyers will be order of magnitude better than Wade and willis.

True. However, the point is to delay since it is unlikely the case will be dismissed. it is more likely Fani and Wade will be disqualified (among other things) and thus the trial date will then be pushed to after the election date. This is obvious I don't need to remind you.

They really want to get it moved out of Fulton County where they feel they can get a more right leaning jury pool. Fulton County is a heavily Dem County. It's not just about a delay.

Look, there are only about 3 or 4 counties in GA that can handle this kind of case (aside from Fulton) that will take lot of resources and they are ALL heavily Dem Counties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Willis is disqualified from prosecution due to conflict of interest then that disqualifies Clarence Thomas from hearing any further SCOTUS cases. For him to continue would be a complete travesty.

The problem is until the story about Thomas broke, the SC was not following a e standard legal code of ethics like lower courts do. They absolutely should have been but they weren't. Fortunately, the exposure of Thomas' behavior prompted the SC to adopt a code of ethics in Nov. Willis was/is subject to the Fulton County code of ethics. Doesn't make it right but it is what it is...

[Anonymous]

GEORGIA
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Canon 2
JUDGES SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL
OFFICE IMPARTIALLY, COMPETENTLY, AND
DILIGENTLY.

Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct

(A) Judges shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. Judges shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor or intimidation, or fear of criticism.
(B) Judges shall not permit family, social, political, financial, or other interests or relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment.
(C) Judges shall not convey or enable others to convey the impression that any person or organization is in a position to influence the judge.

[Anonymous]

I hope someone in GA files a Complaint for Violations of Georgia Judicial Canons and for recusal of this Judge from hearing the accusations against Fani/Wade and the entire Trump case due to conflict of interest based on the fact that he has worked for Fani for several years in the past.

[Anonymous]

Rig an election? You probably call J6 an "insurrection" too.

You probably think the Democrats rigged the election. You probably paid money to go see D'Fraudza's "Mules" movie and actually believed it was a true, hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism. Even though it turns out it was all fake and D'Fraudza doesn't actually have a single piece of actual evidence. https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/

You probably think J6 was "feds" or "Antifa" despite the fact that the Oathkeepers / Proud Boys had key ringleaders and planners like Nordean and Biggs who led the "breach teams" that smashed their way into the Capitol have been identified, prosecuted and sentenced, with piles of evidence.
https://www.axios.com/2023/08/18/enrique-tarrio-proud-boys-jan-6-sentencing

Why do you persist in trying to live in an alternative MAGA dimension that's completely devoid of actual facts and reality?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Willis is disqualified from prosecution due to conflict of interest then that disqualifies Clarence Thomas from hearing any further SCOTUS cases. For him to continue would be a complete travesty.

The problem is until the story about Thomas broke, the SC was not following a e standard legal code of ethics like lower courts do. They absolutely should have been but they weren't. Fortunately, the exposure of Thomas' behavior prompted the SC to adopt a code of ethics in Nov. Willis was/is subject to the Fulton County code of ethics. Doesn't make it right but it is what it is...

It's absolutely outrageous that anyone should be held to a higher standard than a SCOTUS justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way that judge (who worked for Fani for several years before assuming the bench) bent over backwards to accommodate Fani.

Based on my decades of legal experience, any judge other than this Judge in this Hearing would not have tolerated Fani's outbursts and disrespect she displayed for everybody including the Court.

This judge can have some backbone if he wants to: He immediately warned someone that he will have to step out if it happened again after someone was heard laughing when Wade said he received cash.

Basically, this judge let Fani come in unannounced, neither party had called Fani as a witness yet since they were still arguing the attorney-client privilege issue, the judge had NOT yet ruled on the issue and Fani just sat at the witness seat not even giving the Court an opportunity to rule which is highly disrespectful to the Court.

Any other judge would have given Fani 1 stern warning that she would be found in contempt of the Court if it (accusatory tone, hostility, outbursts, speeches etc.) happened again and then the 2nd time Fani disrupts or have another outbursts, she will be sitting in County lockup.

That judge was in Fani's pocket. No other explanation for how the Judge acted when Fani just walked in and took total control and took over the Courtroom.

Any attorney knows that all judges make it absolutely clear who is in control over the courtroom and the judges take it very seriously and even personally if they perceive any disrespect towards the Court and sanctions will fly.

Ridiculous and a completely distorted misrepresentation of what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Rig an election? You probably call J6 an "insurrection" too.

You probably think the Democrats rigged the election. You probably paid money to go see D'Fraudza's "Mules" movie and actually believed it was a true, hard-hitting piece of investigative journalism. Even though it turns out it was all fake and D'Fraudza doesn't actually have a single piece of actual evidence. https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/

You probably think J6 was "feds" or "Antifa" despite the fact that the Oathkeepers / Proud Boys had key ringleaders and planners like Nordean and Biggs who led the "breach teams" that smashed their way into the Capitol have been identified, prosecuted and sentenced, with piles of evidence.
https://www.axios.com/2023/08/18/enrique-tarrio-proud-boys-jan-6-sentencing

Why do you persist in trying to live in an alternative MAGA dimension that's completely devoid of actual facts and reality?

DP. Get out of your echo chamber and check other news sources for context. If you don't want to check Fox, NY Post, Wall St Journal etc., at least check FOREIGN news sources and see what they are covering and what they are saying.

Some examples would be BBC, Japanese News, S. Korean News, French News, German News, Canadian News etc.