I have political views all over the map: very pro-life, anti-death penalty, vegetarian/pro-animal rights, pro-gay rights, and religious. I never know which party to align myself with, so I tend to call myself an independent. Is this true? |
Sounds about right. |
the only two things in that list that seem to be contradictory are pro-gay rights and religious, although you don't say what religion. it is interesting that you regard these as important political views, considering the things that matter more in this world today, such as the economy, foreign policy, and whether government is too big or not. |
How do you view small businesses, financial freedoms, and public assistance? |
Catholic. True, there are many other things, but the issues I listed above are the ones that are most important to me, above all else. |
You sound like a Democrat to me. In fact, even a left-wing Democrat. Welcome to the fringe (don't worry, most of us don't bite). Plenty of progressives are religious. |
Speak for yourself, Jeff. I'm Democrat and I bite. Ask me anything.
Yes, OP. You're a Democrat, simply because if you vote Republican, you're voting against almost everything you believe in. |
You've stated value positions, not policy positions. It would help to think how you think the government should be involved in each of the things above. So:
Should abortion be banned under criminal penalties? Should the death penalty be banned? Should animal testing/eating be banned? Should same sex marriage be banned? |
No- but religious organizations should not be forced to perform gay marriages. I think all marriages (gay and straight) should be done through a civil ceremony, and then religious people, like myself, can have a church wedding if they want. [b] |
If gay marriage is legalized religions will not be forced to perform them. Currently it is perfectly legal for two people of different religions to get married, but if marrying outside the religion isn't permitted within a religion the church can not be forced to perform the marriage. Heck even if a religion is in favor of your getting married, the church and clergy can't be forced to marry you. If they could it would make wedding planning a bit easier. |
You're a pro-life Democrat. They are pretty common. |
This is pretty hilarious response. We find political affiliation by the things that are important to us. OP lists her areas. Then PP here says, "No! The right answer is 'the threat to traditional marriage', 'size of government' and 'brown people sneaking over the Rio Grande'!" Next you'll be correcting OP on her favorite flavor of ice cream. |
Yes, I'm curious what exactly the mechanism for "forcing" churches to perform gay marriages would by. It's the kind of ridiculous hypothetical that's designed to scare uninformed voters to the polls. Strangely, one thing that's not hypothetical is that churches are currently forced to *not* perform gay marriages whereas there are plenty that would if not thwarted by the state. Funny how religious freedom only matters when it's far-right churches. |
Geez, give OP a break. Here's how you force religious institutions to perform same sex mariages: "No person authorized to perform mariages shall discriminate on the basis of race or sexual orientation." |
I posted the above questions. Your answers indicate that you are a pro-life democrat. Remember to vote. |