What American Freedom Looks Like

[Anonymous]

Story here: http://gothamist.com/2012/02/27/lovable_photo_of_kissing_marines_ov.php

[Anonymous]

I'm not a big fan of the legs wrapped around your man thing, but then again it's the first time in their lives that they ever got to do that without fear of being fired. They have a lot of catching up to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not a big fan of the legs wrapped around your man thing, but then again it's the first time in their lives that they ever got to do that without fear of being fired. They have a lot of catching up to do.

Exactly; this is after three deployments to Afghanistan. More power to them.

[Anonymous]

Gross

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gross

Support our troops. That guy risked his life for your freedom.

[takoma]

Anonymous wrote:Gross

I always found the thought of my parents having sex to be gross. But I sure am glad they had the right to do it!

[Anonymous]

After 3 deployments, 2 of which he would have had to greet and leave his partner with a handshake, I don't begrudge this guy anything. War is hell. Welcome home. Hopefully the religious extremists here won't greet him with gunfire as they did in Afghanistan.

[Anonymous]

I never understood the Pentagon's position on gays . I mean, when you're in a foxhole under fire, the only thing you care about is whether the guy next to you is on your side, not on your "team." Who cares how and with whom they bump nasties?

[takoma]

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the Pentagon's position on gays . I mean, when you're in a foxhole under fire, the only thing you care about is whether the guy next to you is on your side, not on your "team." Who cares how and with whom they bump nasties?

I think the argument is about showering and bunking together rather than being in foxholes together. What bothers me is that it is phrased in terms of the discomfort of the other soldiers. This is the same argument used in the 1940's against racial integration of the military. Santorum says it's different because homosexuality is not innate like race. Even if you grant that, the response does not address the placing of one person's comfort over another person's right to equal treatment.

BTW, in prisons, when one prisoner rapes another, I think the rapist is not usually gay, just horny and powerful. That combination is also present in the army, and if such rapes do not occur, it is highly unlikely that any straight soldier need worry about his gay comrades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gross

Your mentality is gross. It is awesome that he is finally able to publicly show his love after fighting for your freedom to say "gross".

[RantingAtheist]

Anonymous wrote:Gross

I think you meant to say "Totally gay"...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Gross

I think it's gross that people who will not support the troops that maintain our freedom and way of life are treated so abysmally. If you can't be supportive, then maybe you don't deserve the freedoms that he endangered his life to provide you.

[Anonymous]

good at sodomy...bad at war... Afghanistan kicking our gay ass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:good at sodomy...bad at war... Afghanistan kicking our gay ass.

You know nothing. You couldn't defend yourself in a game of cards much less in war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Disgusting! There is nothing natural about 2 men having sex! The anal hole is not made for penetration! How can this be accepted?!

Go away, panty sniffer! You are too creepy for an anonymous forum.