Maury Capitol Hill

[Anonymous]

I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

How do they think parents choose schools? Are they consultants or DME?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

How do they think parents choose schools? Are they consultants or DME?

They are just shrugging off all data-driven comments, comments about logistics, alternate suggestions. They literally said “it might be a mess in the beginning but our starting point is that integration and diversity benefits all students.”

[Anonymous]

Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

Is that true? And if so, is it 72% of kids enrolled in public school who are IB for Miner, or 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner? I've always struggled to find data like this because it's extremely relevant to reported "IB participating" rates which can mean different things depending on the pool you're referring to. But I feel like it's often hard to find.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

Is that true? And if so, is it 72% of kids enrolled in public school who are IB for Miner, or 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner? I've always struggled to find data like this because it's extremely relevant to reported "IB participating" rates which can mean different things depending on the pool you're referring to. But I feel like it's often hard to find.

It's 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner. Someone linked the data set earlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

Is that true? And if so, is it 72% of kids enrolled in public school who are IB for Miner, or 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner? I've always struggled to find data like this because it's extremely relevant to reported "IB participating" rates which can mean different things depending on the pool you're referring to. But I feel like it's often hard to find.

It's 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner. Someone linked the data set earlier.

Sorry, as a correction, it's 72% of kids PK3-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

ha, the black Maury parents already peace out to privates and charters after a while at Maury 😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

How do they think parents choose schools? Are they consultants or DME?

They are just shrugging off all data-driven comments, comments about logistics, alternate suggestions. They literally said “it might be a mess in the beginning but our starting point is that integration and diversity benefits all students.”

I liked the part where she pretended to think a question about how the cluster is projected to affect academic outcomes might be about Peabody/Watkins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

Is that true? And if so, is it 72% of kids enrolled in public school who are IB for Miner, or 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner? I've always struggled to find data like this because it's extremely relevant to reported "IB participating" rates which can mean different things depending on the pool you're referring to. But I feel like it's often hard to find.

It's 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner. Someone linked the data set earlier.

Sorry, as a correction, it's 72% of kids PK3-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner

Yes but when you say "kids PK3-12" is this just kids enrolled in DC public schools or does it include kids who are homeschooled or attend privates? Just to clarify.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

How do they think parents choose schools? Are they consultants or DME?

They are just shrugging off all data-driven comments, comments about logistics, alternate suggestions. They literally said “it might be a mess in the beginning but our starting point is that integration and diversity benefits all students.”

yep, that’s what I heard too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

ha, the black Maury parents already peace out to privates and charters after a while at Maury 😂

Well that's its own problem. Why? Unhappiness with Maury, unhappiness with where it feeds, or just broader unhappiness with DCPS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

Is that true? And if so, is it 72% of kids enrolled in public school who are IB for Miner, or 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner? I've always struggled to find data like this because it's extremely relevant to reported "IB participating" rates which can mean different things depending on the pool you're referring to. But I feel like it's often hard to find.

It's 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner. Someone linked the data set earlier.

Sorry, as a correction, it's 72% of kids PK3-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner

Yes but when you say "kids PK3-12" is this just kids enrolled in DC public schools or does it include kids who are homeschooled or attend privates? Just to clarify.

DCPS and charters. Here: https://dme.dc.gov/page/sy2021-22-public-school-enrollments-dcps-boundary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Someone just pointed out that 72% of IB Miner families don’t attend Miner.

Is that true? And if so, is it 72% of kids enrolled in public school who are IB for Miner, or 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner? I've always struggled to find data like this because it's extremely relevant to reported "IB participating" rates which can mean different things depending on the pool you're referring to. But I feel like it's often hard to find.

It's 72% of kids K-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner. Someone linked the data set earlier.

Sorry, as a correction, it's 72% of kids PK3-12 who live IB for Miner do not attend Miner

Yes but when you say "kids PK3-12" is this just kids enrolled in DC public schools or does it include kids who are homeschooled or attend privates? Just to clarify.

DCPS and charters. Here: https://dme.dc.gov/page/sy2021-22-public-school-enrollments-dcps-boundary

Oh, good for you guys -- I've been misreading it. I thought "Number of Grade-Specific Students Living In-boundary" was so clear that I didn't need to check the definitions, but I was wrong. It is defined as "Count of public school students living in the boundary."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am in this meeting. The folks running this are white SJWs and most of them look like they don’t have kids. They are drinking the koolaid and they are SO clueless about how MC/UMC parents choose schools. You Maury people are screwed.

Your best bet is to get the Black Maury parents to lead the charge against this. They’ll be the first to peace out of a Maury/Miner cluster because they care about their kids education and they’re not going to put up with this.

ha, the black Maury parents already peace out to privates and charters after a while at Maury 😂

Well that's its own problem. Why? Unhappiness with Maury, unhappiness with where it feeds, or just broader unhappiness with DCPS?

If you actually don’t live in a bubble and know black MC/UMC families, you know they value education and don’t generally fool around with DCPS especially something like EH MS. They were unhappy with behavior and academics and had better options. The lower SES were unhappy with how Maury handles behavioral issues and the cratering of test scores.