Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then again maybe they're still photoshopping.

Nah, the angle of the neck is wrong. I mean yes they look similar, because it's the same woman. With her hair back, and with a high-ish collar. But the line behind her ear down her neck is completely different, and her head looks to be at a different angle.

Her face looks even thinner than before. I seriously question the steroid/moon face theory with that protruding cheek bone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then again maybe they're still photoshopping.

Nah, the angle of the neck is wrong. I mean yes they look similar, because it's the same woman. With her hair back, and with a high-ish collar. But the line behind her ear down her neck is completely different, and her head looks to be at a different angle.

This is a paparazzi photo. Why would the press make a fake photo of her head?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

Do we think they were headed to that pizza restaurant with the ped ring in the basement??

No. To Four Seasons Total Landscaping. Try to keep up. Haha.

I love you for this! OMG…the Four Seasons Total Landscaping was a riot!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that William and Kate’s marriage has been suffering for a long time (his doing.)

He dumped her and the kids in Adelaide cottage in Windsor, while living a solo life at Kensington palace in London. Things have been strained. Kate, after years of playing the dutiful wife and mother, got a side piece - Thomas Kingston. Possibly connected through Pippa, who once dated him.

Something came to a head at Sandringham over Christmas. Her affair and his played a role. Mostly likely the ambulances on 12/28 were related to Kate, though I suppose possible Charles.

From there there’s a fork - if the ambulances were for Kate, she was either hospitalized for medical or mental reasons. If medical, I believe domestic violence. If mental, I think self harm. If domestic violence, Kate very well may have had surgery and is recovering from injuries. She is estranged from william as she considers her next move. The kids and Charles are also estranged from William. This is a crisis a la Andrew proportions, but worse because William is 1st in line to the throne. If mental, I still think Kate is considering her next moves. her disappearance is a bargaining chip. I posted earlier that both of her siblings were pictured on vacation in January and February, and didnt seem visibly distressed. This is less aligned with DV and more with Kate having had enough. Whatever was going on was not shocking to them. This is also aligned with serious surgery being a cover up and no one visiting Kate at the hospital.

If the ambulances were for Charles, Kate and William still had some kind of breaking point over Xmas. She is refusing to appear and that is all the more leverage without Charles in the picture. The palace announced her absence first to detract from Charles health news.

Something is very much connected with Thomas kingstons recent death and William pulling out of an event that same day.

Now Kate still refuses to appear. TKs death has probably made this worse. I hope she is alright. This is uncharacteristic of her and I 100% am team Kate here.

Why do you think she was having an affair with TK? Where is the proof for that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

How awful. Kate is being stalked like Diana was.

It’s not awful. She signed up for this.

Nah, no one signs up for this level of stalking. Doesn't matter if you're an entertainer, athlete, billionaire, or royalty.

How is she being stalked? The palace told the photographer where to be and when so they could get a picture. And Kate knew to turn away and hide her face.

She is not being stalked.

Why did the palace send photographers if she was going to turn her face and not be photographed. That makes no sense.

That's a great question. Somehow this photo was supposed to silence the questioning - and it's made it worse. Whoever's in charge of their PR needs to be fired.

To force her to smile and wave to appease you? You’re really going off the deep end.

Perhaps if she wasn't turning away, everyone would believe it's her. Stop gaslighting.

The photographers were Jim Bennett/Kelvin Bruce, who are longtime photographers for the Royal Family. Google them and Prince William, and you'll see they've been taking pictures of him since he was a young child. Clearly the photo today was staged.

The photo credit today is BRUCE BENNETT. Says his name right on the image. Who is this Jim you are talking about?

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1876176/kate-middleton-latest-photo-prince-william-windsor-castle

NP but just from reading these 2 quotes I'm assuming Bruce Bennett stands for Kelvin Bruce and Jim Bennett. Now I don't know those people and I haven't googled anything I'm just using common sense.

He's a 3rd, individual photographer. So, the PP was making a point that had nothing to do with the photo credit today. It's right on the image.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that William and Kate’s marriage has been suffering for a long time (his doing.)

He dumped her and the kids in Adelaide cottage in Windsor, while living a solo life at Kensington palace in London. Things have been strained. Kate, after years of playing the dutiful wife and mother, got a side piece - Thomas Kingston. Possibly connected through Pippa, who once dated him.

Something came to a head at Sandringham over Christmas. Her affair and his played a role. Mostly likely the ambulances on 12/28 were related to Kate, though I suppose possible Charles.

From there there’s a fork - if the ambulances were for Kate, she was either hospitalized for medical or mental reasons. If medical, I believe domestic violence. If mental, I think self harm. If domestic violence, Kate very well may have had surgery and is recovering from injuries. She is estranged from william as she considers her next move. The kids and Charles are also estranged from William. This is a crisis a la Andrew proportions, but worse because William is 1st in line to the throne. If mental, I still think Kate is considering her next moves. her disappearance is a bargaining chip. I posted earlier that both of her siblings were pictured on vacation in January and February, and didnt seem visibly distressed. This is less aligned with DV and more with Kate having had enough. Whatever was going on was not shocking to them. This is also aligned with serious surgery being a cover up and no one visiting Kate at the hospital.

If the ambulances were for Charles, Kate and William still had some kind of breaking point over Xmas. She is refusing to appear and that is all the more leverage without Charles in the picture. The palace announced her absence first to detract from Charles health news.

Something is very much connected with Thomas kingstons recent death and William pulling out of an event that same day.

Now Kate still refuses to appear. TKs death has probably made this worse. I hope she is alright. This is uncharacteristic of her and I 100% am team Kate here.

Why do you think she was having an affair with TK? Where is the proof for that?

The voices in the poster's head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

How awful. Kate is being stalked like Diana was.

It’s not awful. She signed up for this.

Nah, no one signs up for this level of stalking. Doesn't matter if you're an entertainer, athlete, billionaire, or royalty.

How is she being stalked? The palace told the photographer where to be and when so they could get a picture. And Kate knew to turn away and hide her face.

She is not being stalked.

Why did the palace send photographers if she was going to turn her face and not be photographed. That makes no sense.

Because she has some free will? Should will hold her face and make sure she looks in the right direction?

Yes, she signed up for it.

+1. She made it through the whole period of separation from William, when the press was calling her Waity Katy. She knew what she was getting into when he finally asked for her hand.

No woman knows what she is getting into when married or first giving birth. Marriage and motherhood is the journey of the unexpected .

One can also make the case that Will knew what he was getting into when he asked for her hand in marriage. If he was so in love with Rose like his father with Camelot, he should’ve spared the poor woman’s heart and married his true love.

Why didn’t he marry rose? She wouldn’t have been good in the role?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

How awful. Kate is being stalked like Diana was.

It’s not awful. She signed up for this.

Nah, no one signs up for this level of stalking. Doesn't matter if you're an entertainer, athlete, billionaire, or royalty.

How is she being stalked? The palace told the photographer where to be and when so they could get a picture. And Kate knew to turn away and hide her face.

She is not being stalked.

Why did the palace send photographers if she was going to turn her face and not be photographed. That makes no sense.

That's a great question. Somehow this photo was supposed to silence the questioning - and it's made it worse. Whoever's in charge of their PR needs to be fired.

To force her to smile and wave to appease you? You’re really going off the deep end.

That’s literally her role.

You are not her subject. Not her job.

[Anonymous]

A lot of people seem to have misread the original statement announcing her leave if absence, and expect her to appear in Easter like some kind of church play.

But the statement said the us "unlikely" to return to public duties until "after Easter." So actually according to their own timeline, she won't appear in a public capacity in Easter.

And after the Ministry of Defense initially listed her as to be in attendance at Trouping the Colour in June, this was retracted after Kensington Palace stated that it was not yet confirmed.

So not only is it apparently unlikely she will appear publicly on Easter, it looks like at least some people in the know think she may still be out of commission in June.

If she's going to just appear like nothing happened at some point, it looks like it might not be sometime soon...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that William and Kate’s marriage has been suffering for a long time (his doing.)

He dumped her and the kids in Adelaide cottage in Windsor, while living a solo life at Kensington palace in London. Things have been strained. Kate, after years of playing the dutiful wife and mother, got a side piece - Thomas Kingston. Possibly connected through Pippa, who once dated him.

Something came to a head at Sandringham over Christmas. Her affair and his played a role. Mostly likely the ambulances on 12/28 were related to Kate, though I suppose possible Charles.

From there there’s a fork - if the ambulances were for Kate, she was either hospitalized for medical or mental reasons. If medical, I believe domestic violence. If mental, I think self harm. If domestic violence, Kate very well may have had surgery and is recovering from injuries. She is estranged from william as she considers her next move. The kids and Charles are also estranged from William. This is a crisis a la Andrew proportions, but worse because William is 1st in line to the throne. If mental, I still think Kate is considering her next moves. her disappearance is a bargaining chip. I posted earlier that both of her siblings were pictured on vacation in January and February, and didnt seem visibly distressed. This is less aligned with DV and more with Kate having had enough. Whatever was going on was not shocking to them. This is also aligned with serious surgery being a cover up and no one visiting Kate at the hospital.

If the ambulances were for Charles, Kate and William still had some kind of breaking point over Xmas. She is refusing to appear and that is all the more leverage without Charles in the picture. The palace announced her absence first to detract from Charles health news.

Something is very much connected with Thomas kingstons recent death and William pulling out of an event that same day.

Now Kate still refuses to appear. TKs death has probably made this worse. I hope she is alright. This is uncharacteristic of her and I 100% am team Kate here.

Why do you think she was having an affair with TK? Where is the proof for that?

I think their circle is small. He’s good looking, aristocratic, around her age, and was mysteriously found dead in the middle of this saga. I do not think it would be surprising if there was a connection.

William also didn’t stray far from home in his affairs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

How awful. Kate is being stalked like Diana was.

It’s not awful. She signed up for this.

Nah, no one signs up for this level of stalking. Doesn't matter if you're an entertainer, athlete, billionaire, or royalty.

She did. She fully knew what she was getting into.

This applies to anyone who married into royalty, right?

I might give anyone who had a short courtship..a little pass…just a little. But someone who dated for 10 years and still said yes, that’s the life I want…nah. She went into this with eyes wide open.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

How awful. Kate is being stalked like Diana was.

It’s not awful. She signed up for this.

Nah, no one signs up for this level of stalking. Doesn't matter if you're an entertainer, athlete, billionaire, or royalty.

How is she being stalked? The palace told the photographer where to be and when so they could get a picture. And Kate knew to turn away and hide her face.

She is not being stalked.

Why did the palace send photographers if she was going to turn her face and not be photographed. That makes no sense.

That's a great question. Somehow this photo was supposed to silence the questioning - and it's made it worse. Whoever's in charge of their PR needs to be fired.

To force her to smile and wave to appease you? You’re really going off the deep end.

That’s literally her role.

You are not her subject. Not her job.

Not me for sure. For the people of England. The BRF are entertainers. Is it 100% her job to be seen and wave at people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still don't get why they tried to pass the old photo off as new. They OFTEN use slightly older photos to commemorate holidays and birthdays. For instance, last year they used photos from the same two photo shoots to commemorate Christmas 2022, Will & Kate's anniversary in 2023, and Mother's Day 2023. They also used photos from another shoot (or possibly the same shoot but different outfits) to commemorate all the kid's birthdays. None of these photos were contemporaneous and in some cases would have been as much as 9-10 months old when posted. None of them were posted with a date -- you can see from the photos that they are "recent enough" to represent generally what they look like right now. It was fine.

So why did they suddenly feel the need to try and pass this photo off as recent? In fact, why even make it ambiguous? Share a photo from December 2023 that was prominently covered to commemorate Mothers Day so it's not even an issue.

I just don't get it. It's such an own goal. They lied, got caught in the lie, and still aren't even admitting it, instead posting a vague admission from Catherine that she sometimes toys with photoshop. It is very strange behavior from a press shop that is usually pretty good.

Didn't she have a recent new hire? Maybe down to inexperience? Could also track with the last minute photoshop?

Yes, I saw something about how she hired a new equerry. I don't really know what an equerry does these days, but it used to be the person who took care of the horses, and I don't believe Kate rides.

He was Queen Elizabeth's equerry. He's now Kate's private secretary. He's also a Royal Marine who looks like Roger Federer, and he certainly could kick William's ass. Just in case that's important.

He can have ALL of my hands.

She’s trading up.

😍

Seriously. Hot damn...

I do hope it wasn’t him, in his new role as her secretary/equerry, who botched the photoshop….

I’d forgive him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now people are saying today’s pic was from Christmas. 🤔

How awful. Kate is being stalked like Diana was.

It’s not awful. She signed up for this.

Nah, no one signs up for this level of stalking. Doesn't matter if you're an entertainer, athlete, billionaire, or royalty.

How is she being stalked? The palace told the photographer where to be and when so they could get a picture. And Kate knew to turn away and hide her face.

She is not being stalked.

Why did the palace send photographers if she was going to turn her face and not be photographed. That makes no sense.

That's a great question. Somehow this photo was supposed to silence the questioning - and it's made it worse. Whoever's in charge of their PR needs to be fired.

To force her to smile and wave to appease you? You’re really going off the deep end.

That’s literally her role.

You are not her subject. Not her job.

Not me for sure. For the people of England. The BRF are entertainers. Is it 100% her job to be seen and wave at people.

They were told she was taking a leave of absence. Likely they can understand what that means more than some uneducated American trolls.

[Anonymous]

Can I point out that all these people triumphantly concern-trolling about her health and welfare are probably harming her health and welfare? No? Ok then. You guys are nuts.