EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

this is funny since there was so many stories about Shiloh moving in with Brad and now he's starting over

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.

Saying you wanted a daughter when you already had an adopted daughter is wrong. As is pushing out stories you're starting over and will just have new kids in retaliation of them dropping their name.

Having new kids will not erase the experiences his whopping six other kids had with his drunken behavior

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.

Saying you wanted a daughter when you already had an adopted daughter is wrong. As is pushing out stories you're starting over and will just have new kids in retaliation of them dropping their name.

Having new kids will not erase the experiences his whopping six other kids had with his drunken behavior

He has tried to have a relationship with his kids for 8 years post-divorce and failed. They are now literally dropping his name.

Moving on is sad. But it isn't wrong or a rejection of his children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.

Saying you wanted a daughter when you already had an adopted daughter is wrong. As is pushing out stories you're starting over and will just have new kids in retaliation of them dropping their name.

Having new kids will not erase the experiences his whopping six other kids had with his drunken behavior

He has tried to have a relationship with his kids for 8 years post-divorce and failed. They are now literally dropping his name.

Moving on is sad. But it isn't wrong or a rejection of his children.

Moving on is fine. Press releases saying you're starting over is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.

Saying you wanted a daughter when you already had an adopted daughter is wrong. As is pushing out stories you're starting over and will just have new kids in retaliation of them dropping their name.

Having new kids will not erase the experiences his whopping six other kids had with his drunken behavior

He has tried to have a relationship with his kids for 8 years post-divorce and failed. They are now literally dropping his name.

Moving on is sad. But it isn't wrong or a rejection of his children.

Moving on is fine. Press releases saying you're starting over is not.

I missed him issuing a press release. I saw a few tabloid stories that may or may not have had sources from his team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

You stated that she must have something on him because he had supervised visits. My point is that supervision is standard during an investigation (which in the end found No Abuse). Doesn’t mean she “has something on him” Just means he cooperated and did whatever was asked to see his kids-including submitting to random testing which wasn’t required of him.

The supervised visitations continued after CPS closed the case and they all had an agreement in place. It wasn't only during the investigation. There's evidence there

Except that no abuse was found, and 50-50 custody recommended, but keep wishing. I wouldn’t doubt she asked for the extended supervision. What we all want to know is what he has on her. Still using hero*n or a synthetic substitute, locking herself in her room days at a time, the obvious ED, sh*t like that. There are several premiers on you tube where she was clearly zonked out of her mind. She’s asked for her own expanded NDAs too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

You stated that she must have something on him because he had supervised visits. My point is that supervision is standard during an investigation (which in the end found No Abuse). Doesn’t mean she “has something on him” Just means he cooperated and did whatever was asked to see his kids-including submitting to random testing which wasn’t required of him.

The supervised visitations continued after CPS closed the case and they all had an agreement in place. It wasn't only during the investigation. There's evidence there

Except that no abuse was found, and 50-50 custody recommended, but keep wishing. I wouldn’t doubt she asked for the extended supervision. What we all want to know is what he has on her. Still using hero*n or a synthetic substitute, locking herself in her room days at a time, the obvious ED, sh*t like that. There are several premiers on you tube where she was clearly zonked out of her mind. She’s asked for her own expanded NDAs too.

You keep repeating joint custody was recommended when in reality the supervised visitations contuined. After the judge was removed he could have asked for a new trial to get joint custody. If she was on drugs Brad would not allow her to be around the kids but okay. In fact he would be an awful parent for allowing it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

This. She has ALWAYS been most concerned about attention and about her image. This is primary to her, regardless of whichever persona she’s working with at the moment: rebel, badass seductress, humanitarian, Queen of Hollywood and now poor sainted abused mother who does nothing wrong & is still, almost a decade later, “healing”. Her sycophants lap up everything “Anj” says and does. Gullible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.

Saying you wanted a daughter when you already had an adopted daughter is wrong. As is pushing out stories you're starting over and will just have new kids in retaliation of them dropping their name.

Having new kids will not erase the experiences his whopping six other kids had with his drunken behavior

He has tried to have a relationship with his kids for 8 years post-divorce and failed. They are now literally dropping his name.

Moving on is sad. But it isn't wrong or a rejection of his children.

Moving on is fine. Press releases saying you're starting over is not.

I missed him issuing a press release. I saw a few tabloid stories that may or may not have had sources from his team.

This. Bottom feeder tab speculation presented as fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

You stated that she must have something on him because he had supervised visits. My point is that supervision is standard during an investigation (which in the end found No Abuse). Doesn’t mean she “has something on him” Just means he cooperated and did whatever was asked to see his kids-including submitting to random testing which wasn’t required of him.

The supervised visitations continued after CPS closed the case and they all had an agreement in place. It wasn't only during the investigation. There's evidence there

Except that no abuse was found, and 50-50 custody recommended, but keep wishing. I wouldn’t doubt she asked for the extended supervision. What we all want to know is what he has on her. Still using hero*n or a synthetic substitute, locking herself in her room days at a time, the obvious ED, sh*t like that. There are several premiers on you tube where she was clearly zonked out of her mind. She’s asked for her own expanded NDAs too.

You keep repeating joint custody was recommended when in reality the supervised visitations contuined. After the judge was removed he could have asked for a new trial to get joint custody. If she was on drugs Brad would not allow her to be around the kids but okay. In fact he would be an awful parent for allowing it.

You keep getting stuck on supervised visits but the facts are, CPS spoke to everyone, the kids, Nannie’s, therapists, including the one she filed against and said there was no abuse. They also recommended 50-50 custody. The judge then granted this. He fought her appeal to the CA Sup Ct. by then the youngest kids were around 13. Why are you bashing him for not trying again for custody when they’re in their teens but not her for continually fighting against it in the first place. He just cannot win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

You stated that she must have something on him because he had supervised visits. My point is that supervision is standard during an investigation (which in the end found No Abuse). Doesn’t mean she “has something on him” Just means he cooperated and did whatever was asked to see his kids-including submitting to random testing which wasn’t required of him.

The supervised visitations continued after CPS closed the case and they all had an agreement in place. It wasn't only during the investigation. There's evidence there

Except that no abuse was found, and 50-50 custody recommended, but keep wishing. I wouldn’t doubt she asked for the extended supervision. What we all want to know is what he has on her. Still using hero*n or a synthetic substitute, locking herself in her room days at a time, the obvious ED, sh*t like that. There are several premiers on you tube where she was clearly zonked out of her mind. She’s asked for her own expanded NDAs too.

You keep repeating joint custody was recommended when in reality the supervised visitations contuined. After the judge was removed he could have asked for a new trial to get joint custody. If she was on drugs Brad would not allow her to be around the kids but okay. In fact he would be an awful parent for allowing it.

You keep getting stuck on supervised visits but the facts are, CPS spoke to everyone, the kids, Nannie’s, therapists, including the one she filed against and said there was no abuse. They also recommended 50-50 custody. The judge then granted this. He fought her appeal to the CA Sup Ct. by then the youngest kids were around 13. Why are you bashing him for not trying again for custody when they’re in their teens but not her for continually fighting against it in the first place. He just cannot win.

The judge didn't grant it until 2020/2021 when he filed for the modification...Why does it matter that the kids were around 13? Pax was 17 years old when he tried to force more visitations. Pax being a teen didn't stop him them. If some of the kids fine with it why not take that opportunity to have more time with them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.

Saying you wanted a daughter when you already had an adopted daughter is wrong. As is pushing out stories you're starting over and will just have new kids in retaliation of them dropping their name.

Having new kids will not erase the experiences his whopping six other kids had with his drunken behavior

He has tried to have a relationship with his kids for 8 years post-divorce and failed. They are now literally dropping his name.

Moving on is sad. But it isn't wrong or a rejection of his children.

Moving on is fine. Press releases saying you're starting over is not.

I missed him issuing a press release. I saw a few tabloid stories that may or may not have had sources from his team.

This. Bottom feeder tab speculation presented as fact.

Yet people were repeated bottom feeder tabs as facts before when it came to Shiloh moving in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

This. She has ALWAYS been most concerned about attention and about her image. This is primary to her, regardless of whichever persona she’s working with at the moment: rebel, badass seductress, humanitarian, Queen of Hollywood and now poor sainted abused mother who does nothing wrong & is still, almost a decade later, “healing”. Her sycophants lap up everything “Anj” says and does. Gullible.

In fact, the opposite is true. She dngaf which is why she has no pr team and is so hated. She’s real and doesn’t try to paint herself any other way like the rest of Hollywood. That’s why she’s been labeled a misfit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

This. She has ALWAYS been most concerned about attention and about her image. This is primary to her, regardless of whichever persona she’s working with at the moment: rebel, badass seductress, humanitarian, Queen of Hollywood and now poor sainted abused mother who does nothing wrong & is still, almost a decade later, “healing”. Her sycophants lap up everything “Anj” says and does. Gullible.

In fact, the opposite is true. She dngaf which is why she has no pr team and is so hated. She’s real and doesn’t try to paint herself any other way like the rest of Hollywood. That’s why she’s been labeled a misfit.

She's real? Boy, did you drink the Kool Aid. She's completely unrelatable to almost everyone. She's weird AF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

This. She has ALWAYS been most concerned about attention and about her image. This is primary to her, regardless of whichever persona she’s working with at the moment: rebel, badass seductress, humanitarian, Queen of Hollywood and now poor sainted abused mother who does nothing wrong & is still, almost a decade later, “healing”. Her sycophants lap up everything “Anj” says and does. Gullible.

In fact, the opposite is true. She dngaf which is why she has no pr team and is so hated. She’s real and doesn’t try to paint herself any other way like the rest of Hollywood. That’s why she’s been labeled a misfit.

She's real? Boy, did you drink the Kool Aid. She's completely unrelatable to almost everyone. She's weird AF.

That’s my point. She IS weird. If she were concerned about her image and spin, that would not be the perception. Of course this makes her more real than people like George and Amal Clooney who severely control their image through an army of publicists. This is why she gets bad press and they don’t.