EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

... She didn't allow visitation.

She hasn’t stopped visitations for 8 years come on. They just had a recently stipulation that even talked about his visitations with Knox. He's just not taking advantage of them as he should.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

You stated that she must have something on him because he had supervised visits. My point is that supervision is standard during an investigation (which in the end found No Abuse). Doesn’t mean she “has something on him” Just means he cooperated and did whatever was asked to see his kids-including submitting to random testing which wasn’t required of him.

[Anonymous]

She’s a nasty, terrible “mother” who has sought to endlessly traumatize her children by alienating them from their father and by constantly keeping stories of her abuse allegations in the media years after the incident happened. The “post traumatic stress” the children have suffered is a result of having a crazy mother who cannot move on and is intent on endlessly reliving past events.

Pitt’s PR rep had the perfect statement about this crazy woman: “It’s incredibly sad that she continues to rehash, revise and reimagine her description of an event that happened 6 years ago, adding in completely untrue information to try to get additional attention for herself at the expense of their family,” a source told People.

“She had the opportunity to share information with law enforcement who made the decision not to press charges. She had the chance to share this during the lengthy custody trial, which resulted in the judge granting 50-50 custody to Pitt. She has resorted to trying to keep rehashing the same thing. Going back to the same thing month after month with new and still false information for purposes that only she can understand,” the source added.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She thought from the beginning he would roll over and give her anything she wanted rather than be publicly embarrassed. When that didn’t happen, sure enough she punished him whenever she lost a legal motion. Drip, drip, drip of embarrassing info plus the chateau shares sale. He’s got nothing left to lose at this point, should go scorched earth. And highly likely he can prove her sale was about the custody ruling not the NDA.

If she has receipts on him physically abusing her and the kids, he absolutely has more to lose. That said, he must have some nutso info on her too, because she is insane.

It's been 8 years and already investigated. She has no receipts. Obviously.

She had something because he started off with supervised visitation.

Supervised visitation is standard when there’s an ongoing investigation. I’ve been a superviser. Once CPS concluded there was no abuse, that stopped.

No it didn't. He agreed with CPS to have supervivised vists afterward the investigation stopped.

You stated that she must have something on him because he had supervised visits. My point is that supervision is standard during an investigation (which in the end found No Abuse). Doesn’t mean she “has something on him” Just means he cooperated and did whatever was asked to see his kids-including submitting to random testing which wasn’t required of him.

The supervised visitations continued after CPS closed the case and they all had an agreement in place. It wasn't only during the investigation. There's evidence there

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s a nasty, terrible “mother” who has sought to endlessly traumatize her children by alienating them from their father and by constantly keeping stories of her abuse allegations in the media years after the incident happened. The “post traumatic stress” the children have suffered is a result of having a crazy mother who cannot move on and is intent on endlessly reliving past events.

Pitt’s PR rep had the perfect statement about this crazy woman: “It’s incredibly sad that she continues to rehash, revise and reimagine her description of an event that happened 6 years ago, adding in completely untrue information to try to get additional attention for herself at the expense of their family,” a source told People.

“She had the opportunity to share information with law enforcement who made the decision not to press charges. She had the chance to share this during the lengthy custody trial, which resulted in the judge granting 50-50 custody to Pitt. She has resorted to trying to keep rehashing the same thing. Going back to the same thing month after month with new and still false information for purposes that only she can understand,” the source added.

Pitts PR also said no one got physically hurt. That wasn't true. Also missing out then "judge was disqualified due to the relationship with his lawyer" part.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

This is completely fabricated. There were photos of him hopping on a plane to visit the kids when Jolie was filming in London, Italy, wherever. He did not blow off his visitation. He has maintained all along that she obstructed visitation whenever possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

This is completely fabricated. There were photos of him hopping on a plane to visit the kids when Jolie was filming in London, Italy, wherever. He did not blow off his visitation. He has maintained all along that she obstructed visitation whenever possible.

A couple of visits here and then is literally nothing. One of the twins friends said he indeed infact blew off the kids graduation. I believe them. If all of the visitations were obstructed then he would have been back to court repeatedly and would have gotten a tighter schedule down. By that I mean preplaning holidays and events to so he can be there. Instead he keeps it at status quo which is perfect for someone who likes the flexibility of not having strict commitments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

Because she uses the children as part of her public image. She wants the “devoted mom” image, so she makes sure she is constantly papped with her children, does photo shoots with her children and talks about them in the press all the time. She doesn’t care about their privacy, because her public image is more important to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now CNN is reporting on the lengthy divorce:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/entertainment/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-divorce-key-moments/index.html

Jolie's passive-aggressive digs at Pitt are absurd. She hopes he will "eventually want peace for the family too." Which apparently translates to he should never see the kids and should let her sale of half of Miraval to a hostile party stand. Basically making it clear her actions are punitive based on his lawsuits against her re: custody and Miraval.

One interesting tidbit. The NDAs apparently could result in unsealing lots of info about their personal business. If he wants this to happen, could be revealing.

Well that's not true. If you read the article, plus all the others previously posted, she had no problem with visitation for Brad. A private arbitrator who did not disclose his connections with Brad and his conflict of interest granted joint custody ruling in favor of Brad. An appellate court reversed, so obviously Brad and his team were not playing fair. Reminds me of the bankruptcy judge down in Texas taking cases and not disclosing his personal connections with the female attorney who always prevailed in his court.

Sure. She just conditioned the kids to dislike and fear him, and obstructed their visits and contact at every turn.

She did not have to condition the kids, he did it to himself when he chose not to participate in visitation. He wanted it his way or nothing at all. You don't have to tell a child that their mother or father is a dirtbag or POS. It reveals itself by that parent's actions or lack thereof.

+1

I didn't read all the previous pages but it's quite likely he was treating the adopted kids differently.They did a great job at bonding the kids together and the alcoholic father who physical/mentally harmed one or more of them is not going to break that bond. If anything it will push them closer.

I noticed stories about him have dramatically shifted from Shiloh and Knox being his mini brads to none of the kids visit him but that's okay because he's starting over with a new family. Telling and not in a good way

I mean, it's easy to make up anything because he generally has said very little about any of the kids, ever. Like all normal parents, both Hollywood and non-Hollywood. Angie is the strange parent who has exposed her children much more than other parents do.

The "he always wanted daughter" comment and stories about him starting over says it all for me. It's almost worst since I am sure multiple people looked at them before sending it to the press. It might not be Brad directly but he's paying them and what is said ultimately reflects his mindset.

There is nothing wrong with any of the comments in the articles. He’s a father who has been hurt by his vindictive ex-wife’s campaign of parental alienation against him. He is obviously hurt at being cut out of his children’s lives and having his last name dropped. I’m not surprised he’s thinking of having more children with a sane woman, because his crazy ex-wife will ensure he is cut out of his children’s lives as long as she has an influence over them. If he has more children and shows the world he is a good father to them, it will be clear that Angelina is the problem/parental alienator, and she can no longer use the children as a weapon against him to hurt him.