Does anybody know the incident recently happened in Sidwell?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These things are dealt with by the administration. At no point are they required to have a transparent policy of how they go about that.

I agree with the poster who says just because you're not getting the finer details doesn't mean they aren't happening.

You are missing the point. Action should be swift and transparent so that consequences are known to the community. That sends a clear signal of what is accepted or not. Rather than a slap on the wrist like community service.

Actions have already been taken. No slaps on wrists. Let's respect the privacy of those involved.

what action?

If you have to ask, then it isn't your business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These things are dealt with by the administration. At no point are they required to have a transparent policy of how they go about that.

I agree with the poster who says just because you're not getting the finer details doesn't mean they aren't happening.

You are missing the point. Action should be swift and transparent so that consequences are known to the community. That sends a clear signal of what is accepted or not. Rather than a slap on the wrist like community service.

Actions have already been taken. No slaps on wrists. Let's respect the privacy of those involved.

what action?

If you have to ask, then it isn't your business.

NP. Right but current and prospective parents have a right to know whether the student has been identified or whether they may be w teeing a community with someone that associates themselves with swatsikas.

[jsteele]

Given that minors are involved, it is not appropriate to share information regarding punishments. Current or prospective parents should contact the school for further information.