Does anybody know the incident recently happened in Sidwell?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wishy washy Admin. On Friday the MS Head gave a long speech about tolerance and that there would be “severe consequences” for hateful and racist behavior. Consequences were unspecified.

Never mind that the consequences for repeat offenders using the N-word in MS has been half day in school suspensions. Not severe enough to be a meaningful consequence for repeat offenders and sends the wrong signal.


The N word was used and the consequence was half day in school suspension? I found this play only outrageous. My DC has been admited and now I have serious second thoughts. Is this an old incident?


Maybe ask the school rather than read it on an anonymous message board?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm Jewish and this is how I would want it handled. I would need to know more about these kids. Are they spewing antisemitism and hatred in other contexts or was this is a dare and some really stupid impulsive actions? Are they bullies? How did they justify the actions?

One of my kids is really impulsive and he has done some truly moronic things on dares. Never hateful, but still.

If this is a first offense for them or there is evidence these are decent kids who were ignorant and impulsive I would rather this be turned into a learning experience. I agree with having them go to the Holocaust museum and write a paper. I would also have them doing volunteer work around the school and have a disciplinary action where they are on probation and could be kicked out for another offense. If they are truly hateful kids who have repeat offenses, then expel.


+1. This would be the sensible approach.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:brains aren't fully developed until 25-27...seriously impulsive behavior. I'm sure the kid is mortified right now. An amnesty should be declared to turn him/herself in and then a look to teachable moments in the classroom - not just about bigoted language (if it was? I haven't seen what exactly it was) but also the privileges and responsibilities of media and tech usage. But overall, this is not the biggest deal - it's just massively amplified by the echoes of the coverage. - not a Sidwell parent


I have a 9 and 12 year old. We are white and not Jewish. Both of my children know about hate language and know that they may NEVER use it. If they did anything like this I would expect the school to take strong and decisive action and, while I would be devastated for my child, I would support the school. This is not about an impulse. That language and thought process should not be a joke. This is not impulsivity. This is hate.


But why would you have to TELL your kids not to use hate language and threaten them with consequences?
Shouldn’t that just be natural?


No. It needs to be taught. I'm a child therapist. Spell out your values and expectations at home, parents. Kids are watching and listening and need to be told. Make sure you're not making racist comments yourselves, even borderline ones, like generalizations about groups of people.


Privilege is assuming you don’t have to talk about hate speech or racism or antisemitism or sexism. My black friends don’t have the option of whether or not to discuss racism and hate speech with their kids. They live in America where racism exists and they need to prepare their kids for the world they live in. White parents as a general matter get to decide if and when they discuss racism and hate speech with their white kids. Far too many white parents never discuss hate speech and racism with their kids until they are forced to do so by something happening—like the incident at Sidwell. My Jewish friends all learned about the Holocaust and antisemetism. The Holocaust happened and we need to know about it so we prevent it from ever happening again. Antisemetism exists so you need to prepare your kids for what they may encounter. Privilege is not having to worry about that and privilege is being able to decide when you share the ugly side of life with your kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:brains aren't fully developed until 25-27...seriously impulsive behavior. I'm sure the kid is mortified right now. An amnesty should be declared to turn him/herself in and then a look to teachable moments in the classroom - not just about bigoted language (if it was? I haven't seen what exactly it was) but also the privileges and responsibilities of media and tech usage. But overall, this is not the biggest deal - it's just massively amplified by the echoes of the coverage. - not a Sidwell parent


I have a 9 and 12 year old. We are white and not Jewish. Both of my children know about hate language and know that they may NEVER use it. If they did anything like this I would expect the school to take strong and decisive action and, while I would be devastated for my child, I would support the school. This is not about an impulse. That language and thought process should not be a joke. This is not impulsivity. This is hate.


But why would you have to TELL your kids not to use hate language and threaten them with consequences?
Shouldn’t that just be natural?


No. It needs to be taught. I'm a child therapist. Spell out your values and expectations at home, parents. Kids are watching and listening and need to be told. Make sure you're not making racist comments yourselves, even borderline ones, like generalizations about groups of people.


Privilege is assuming you don’t have to talk about hate speech or racism or antisemitism or sexism. My black friends don’t have the option of whether or not to discuss racism and hate speech with their kids. They live in America where racism exists and they need to prepare their kids for the world they live in. White parents as a general matter get to decide if and when they discuss racism and hate speech with their white kids. Far too many white parents never discuss hate speech and racism with their kids until they are forced to do so by something happening—like the incident at Sidwell. My Jewish friends all learned about the Holocaust and antisemetism. The Holocaust happened and we need to know about it so we prevent it from ever happening again. Antisemetism exists so you need to prepare your kids for what they may encounter. Privilege is not having to worry about that and privilege is being able to decide when you share the ugly side of life with your kids.


Jewish mom here. I agree with a lot of this but I wouldn’t single out race here. While you say that white people have the luxury of not having to explain hate to their children, I think much of this has to do with the education system and moral equivalency taught in schools. WWII education has shifted away from teaching the evils of the Holocaust. Moral equivalency is what’s being taught in schools today. Kids are learning more about the Environmental effects of the atom bomb and less about Hitler’s motives and methods. Any good, decent human being (and I certainly believe that children are good and decent) can see that a swastika symbolizes the worst of humankind if they are educated about it. We seem to be educating after the fact.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:brains aren't fully developed until 25-27...seriously impulsive behavior. I'm sure the kid is mortified right now. An amnesty should be declared to turn him/herself in and then a look to teachable moments in the classroom - not just about bigoted language (if it was? I haven't seen what exactly it was) but also the privileges and responsibilities of media and tech usage. But overall, this is not the biggest deal - it's just massively amplified by the echoes of the coverage. - not a Sidwell parent


I have a 9 and 12 year old. We are white and not Jewish. Both of my children know about hate language and know that they may NEVER use it. If they did anything like this I would expect the school to take strong and decisive action and, while I would be devastated for my child, I would support the school. This is not about an impulse. That language and thought process should not be a joke. This is not impulsivity. This is hate.


But why would you have to TELL your kids not to use hate language and threaten them with consequences?
Shouldn’t that just be natural?


No. It needs to be taught. I'm a child therapist. Spell out your values and expectations at home, parents. Kids are watching and listening and need to be told. Make sure you're not making racist comments yourselves, even borderline ones, like generalizations about groups of people.


Privilege is assuming you don’t have to talk about hate speech or racism or antisemitism or sexism. My black friends don’t have the option of whether or not to discuss racism and hate speech with their kids. They live in America where racism exists and they need to prepare their kids for the world they live in. White parents as a general matter get to decide if and when they discuss racism and hate speech with their white kids. Far too many white parents never discuss hate speech and racism with their kids until they are forced to do so by something happening—like the incident at Sidwell. My Jewish friends all learned about the Holocaust and antisemetism. The Holocaust happened and we need to know about it so we prevent it from ever happening again. Antisemetism exists so you need to prepare your kids for what they may encounter. Privilege is not having to worry about that and privilege is being able to decide when you share the ugly side of life with your kids.


Jewish mom here. I agree with a lot of this but I wouldn’t single out race here. While you say that white people have the luxury of not having to explain hate to their children, I think much of this has to do with the education system and moral equivalency taught in schools. WWII education has shifted away from teaching the evils of the Holocaust. Moral equivalency is what’s being taught in schools today. Kids are learning more about the Environmental effects of the atom bomb and less about Hitler’s motives and methods. Any good, decent human being (and I certainly believe that children are good and decent) can see that a swastika symbolizes the worst of humankind if they are educated about it. We seem to be educating after the fact.


I am the PP who referred to privilege. I agree with you. The point I was trying to make and didn't finish (I shouldn't post late at night) was that we all have to talk about these issues to our children whether we think we are directly affected by them or not. I was raised Catholic and I had parents who taught me about the Holocaust, the evils of Hitler, antisemitism, the evils of hate speech, why it was dangerous, why it mattered, why it was wrong, etc. My kids go to a school where kids learn about the issues in an age appropriate way from a young age. My point is that there are parents who think they don't need to talk about unpleasant things like the Holocaust or slavery or genocide or hate speech or racism or homophobia, etc. They think that if they just tell their kids to be nice that it's enough. It's not. A later poster write "But, who really wants discuss putting people in ovens unless it is necessary." I would argue it is necessary. You have to do it in an age appropriate way so that you don't overwhelm or frighten your child but you have to do it. My point about privilege is that some people may think they never have to talk to their children about the gas chambers because they are not Jewish. I would argue that we must talk to our children about that whether we are Jewish or not so it never happens again. You need to start the conversation early in an age appropriate way. Think about what you were taught about slavery. I was taught a sanitized version of it that doesn't make white people too uncomfortable and I grew up in the northeast where I learned more of the full story of slavery than some of my friends from college learned in other areas of the country. You need to talk about the darkest parts of the Holocaust, the darkest parts of slavery, the darkest parts of homophobia, anti-Semitism, racism, etc. with your children and your friends and colleagues because when you don't people think these things really weren't that bad and you risk them happening again.

I will also note that when I learned about the atomic bomb my parents also discussed with me the dilemma Harry Truman faced. Drop the bomb which was awful and horrible or don't drop the bomb and hundreds of thousands of lives were lost trying to bring an end to the war in the Pacific. We can teach our kids about hard, imperfect choices and the dark side of human nature. I would argue that teaching them about those things is the morally responsible thing to do.
Anonymous
The whole story about swastikas carved into benches turned out to be fake news.
Anonymous
Am I the only one who thinks the disciplinary reaction in the community letters so far has been tepid at best? There's a time for reflection, but there are certain things that warrant something closer to zero tolerance.
Anonymous
Yes, response seems very tepid to me so far. As a Sidwell parent, I was expecting something more commensurate with the abhorrent incident. Suspension or expulsion. I am profoundly disappointed. There is a bright red line here and it was crossed. It needs to be answered by the school’s leadership. Takes moral courage, I know.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes, response seems very tepid to me so far. As a Sidwell parent, I was expecting something more commensurate with the abhorrent incident. Suspension or expulsion. I am profoundly disappointed. There is a bright red line here and it was crossed. It needs to be answered by the school’s leadership. Takes moral courage, I know.


I agree, but also understand that the school has to do enough diligence before taking decisive action. It has only been 1 school day since this happened.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, response seems very tepid to me so far. As a Sidwell parent, I was expecting something more commensurate with the abhorrent incident. Suspension or expulsion. I am profoundly disappointed. There is a bright red line here and it was crossed. It needs to be answered by the school’s leadership. Takes moral courage, I know.


I agree, but also understand that the school has to do enough diligence before taking decisive action. It has only been 1 school day since this happened.


Has the student been identified? If not, the school can’t take any action.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm Jewish and this is how I would want it handled. I would need to know more about these kids. Are they spewing antisemitism and hatred in other contexts or was this is a dare and some really stupid impulsive actions? Are they bullies? How did they justify the actions?

One of my kids is really impulsive and he has done some truly moronic things on dares. Never hateful, but still.

If this is a first offense for them or there is evidence these are decent kids who were ignorant and impulsive I would rather this be turned into a learning experience. I agree with having them go to the Holocaust museum and write a paper. I would also have them doing volunteer work around the school and have a disciplinary action where they are on probation and could be kicked out for another offense. If they are truly hateful kids who have repeat offenses, then expel.


+1. This would be the sensible approach.


So I posted much earlier that my kids' ECs/Sports team communiteis have recently been impacted by racist phone messages. The approach you describe was similar to what was taken in our case and it was embraced by the family that was targeted by hateful speech. The problem, and where I fell like the organization fell short, is that it didn't communicate to the larger community what had happened and what exactly had been done about it. My kids know what happened part (because word travels), they know who the perpetrators were, they know who was targeted and from where they sit the consequences appear minor. This is a problem for parents who would their kids to believe that hateful racist text message targeting a specific teammate are unacceptable and would CAUSE a massive consequence. Instead, we see a "meh" response. So I agree, there is great value in finding the teaching moments in these sorts of incidents, but the message the organizations' response sends to the "bystanders" is also important.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes, response seems very tepid to me so far. As a Sidwell parent, I was expecting something more commensurate with the abhorrent incident. Suspension or expulsion. I am profoundly disappointed. There is a bright red line here and it was crossed. It needs to be answered by the school’s leadership. Takes moral courage, I know.


Why ? When a student sexually assaulted (to put it mildly) another student several years ago they very quietly put him on leave after some time had elapsed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, response seems very tepid to me so far. As a Sidwell parent, I was expecting something more commensurate with the abhorrent incident. Suspension or expulsion. I am profoundly disappointed. There is a bright red line here and it was crossed. It needs to be answered by the school’s leadership. Takes moral courage, I know.


I agree, but also understand that the school has to do enough diligence before taking decisive action. It has only been 1 school day since this happened.


Has the student been identified? If not, the school can’t take any action.


Whatever the status of identifying the student, there have been at least three letters sent out, each one more infuriating than the last. Emphasizing the light in the student who engaged in hate speech without any strong language about the fact that an inexcusable line was crossed. Almost no talk of consequences or how seriously the matter will actually be treated. Little talk of how seriously it OUGHT to be treated. Stating how the school wishes the incident could have been prevented (ha!) while failing to discuss any ideas for revisiting technology policies, etc. Mentioning discussion groups and meetings that occurred after the last incident (yes, there have been more than one!) without seeing the irony: clearly the "discussions" weren't terribly effective.

Other schools facing similar incidents responded with swift, appropriate, and unequivocal condemnation when faced with similar incidents. knowing the student's identity is not a necessary prerequisite to showing backbone on hate speech.
Anonymous
They did issue swift, appropriate, and unequivocal condemnation. Both in the parent-alumni communications and also directly in conversations with the students. Just because they don’t run the behind-the-scenes details by you and sharing every detail at this stage doesn’t mean they’re not doing their job. Get off your high horse and show a little restraint as this plays out.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Yes, response seems very tepid to me so far. As a Sidwell parent, I was expecting something more commensurate with the abhorrent incident. Suspension or expulsion. I am profoundly disappointed. There is a bright red line here and it was crossed. It needs to be answered by the school’s leadership. Takeps moral courage, I know.


I agree, but also understand that the school has to do enough diligence before taking decisive action. It has only been 1 school day since this happened.


Has the student been identified? If not, the school can’t take any action.


Whatever the status of identifying the student, there have been at least three letters sent out, each one more infuriating than the last. Emphasizing the light in the student who engaged in hate speech without any strong language about the fact that an inexcusable line was crossed. Almost no talk of consequences or how seriously the matter will actually be treated. Little talk of how seriously it OUGHT to be treated. Stating how the school wishes the incident could have been prevented (ha!) while failing to discuss any ideas for revisiting technology policies, etc. Mentioning discussion groups and meetings that occurred after the last incident (yes, there have been more than one!) without seeing the irony: clearly the "discussions" weren't terribly effective.

Other schools facing similar incidents responded with swift, appropriate, and unequivocal condemnation when faced with similar incidents. knowing the student's identity is not a necessary prerequisite to showing backbone on hate speech.


Then just tell us what you Will do? make an announcement that the student will be expelled as soon as being identified? You mentioned other schools and give us more details so people can compare. For example what GDS did last year.
Forum Index » Private & Independent Schools
Go to: