Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I get the urge, but don’t.
Even if it technically legal in your podunk state…don’t. Carjackings are on a major rise all over the country, in all demographics. Turning to use the atm - which was the og question- will have you distracted enough to not be supervising. Beyond that there are so many other things that can go wrong.
Lol are you closely supervising your sleeping baby while you are driving the car? And speaking of “so many things can go wrong”— that’s literally what driving in your car is, every time. So are things like leaving your baby in the care of others.
The truth is that something could always happen. Statistically, your child is more likely to be in a car accident than to be snatched from your car when you are standing a few feet away. They are more likely to fall off a piece of furniture or choke on food they grab off another child’s plate at daycare than to overheat in a car in a few minutes time. I’m really not sure why people are so fixated on this situation as so dangerous. Life is inherently dangerous, but we assess risk and find a way to figure it out. I think many people on this thread are being incredibly hypocritical here.
Yes. It’s important to never leave your child in a car that is idling with the keys in the ignition. That’s asking for trouble. I never ever leave my car idling with my kid in it. I have done things that took me away from the car for less than a minute as long as the car was within my eyesight.
Because it's easy to take your child out of the car fir a trip to the ATM. Meanwhile, it's hard to structure your life in such a way that your child is never in a car/susceptible to a car accident. Life is dangerous, yes. No one is denying that by saying not to take a completely unnecessary risk.
It’s not necessarily easy to take your child out of the car to go to an ATM, and doing so isn’t necessarily safer than leaving them in the car. I have a 5 year old with special needs that is a severe elopement risk. He’s not going to reliably stand by my side at an ATM. The risk of him running off into road is much greater than the risk something is going to happen to him in the car. And when he and his twin sibling were younger, but old enough to be out of carrying car seats, it would be very hard to take them out of the car. I'm not going to set up a tandem stroller to go 10ft. I'd leave one in the car while I'd carry the other into the house. And yes, I'd leave them in the car to walk up to an ATM as long as I could still see them.
This. It’s not always easy to get your kid out of the car to run a quick errand. What about stopping somewhere to pick up two heavy bags that need to be loaded into your trunk? Do you need to get a sleeping baby out of the car and into a carrier to complete this task?
Also, if going to an ATM poses such a high risk of being robbed, what god does bringing your baby do? Say you take the car seat out of the car and carry it over to the ATM. You will need to put car seat down to use the machine. Can’t someone come grab the car seat and run? Can’t the rob you right there next to your baby? Wouldn’t you rather your baby be safely in the car in the extremely remote chance this happens?
It’s just so weird that people in this thread are FREAKED OUT about the possibility of either a carjacking or a child overheating (rare things that are extremely unlikely to happen, especially if you know the crime rates in the neighborhood and are only gone a few minutes) but will handwave all the stuff that could happen if you get the baby out of the car.
I think people are uncomfortable with risk and think that if they are vigilant they can control it, but you can’t. Most actions carry some risk. You have to accept it and stop judging people for taking slightly different risks than you.