Posters your sick of!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Posters who are just shocked and horrified - simply horrified! - when another poster curses. Seriously, people, it's the internet. If you are mortally offended when someone says fuck, you're in the wrong place. Ditto for those who believe that cursing that somehow involves religion should be taboo.

And posters who write "f*ck" irritate me, too. What possible reason is there for that? You know what you mean, we know what you mean - just say it. Do you really think it makes a difference because you omit a vowel?

Writing f*ck means instead of fuck is helpful, because it stops some filters from blocking the page. Not that either bothers me.

And don't pretend you don't understand that "mixing curses with religion" is offensive because it is disrespectful to religion, not because of the cursing per se. Your way is not the highway - try not to be so arrogant.

Oh, I understand it, I just think it's ridiculous. Not sure how I'm being arrogant, by the way - do you have a good grasp of that definition?

They think I'm a disrespectful heathen bound for the fires of hell, I think they're oversensitive ninnys whose faith can't be that strong if they are so bothered by the exclamation, 'Jesus Fucking Christ," or something similar

This is not specific to the religious, by the way - I think anyone who has a meltdown because someone said something "disrespectful" of *anything* on an anonymous internet forum is an oversensitive ninny. As I said, possibly the internet is a bad choice if you're that fragile.

I think you're an ass. But you already know that you are.

[Anonymous]

Oops, forgot to mention the childish gotcha games. These are a big part of your posting strategy too. You must be so proud.

[Anonymous]

All this time and no one mentions "the Panty Sniffer"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

You're not as tough as you proclaim. You're actually no better than a school yard bully. And I'm not the poster you've been jabbing.

[Anonymous]

All the posters who post a short query asking for where to find something and do not include where they live and then respond piecemeal with their location "Oh, we're in NoVa", "No, Alexandria's too far." "Sorry, but we're not in Tyson's. We're in Woodbridge."

If you ask for where to find something, include where you live.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

But I was cool in high school!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

Wasn't that a long time ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

For a definition of "arrogant," check out what I've bolded. And yes, it's "arrogant" to decide, in your great wisdom, that somebody else is a "ninny" so you are entitled to be rude to them. Apparently you think you are *great* in your *own* mind, and bully for you. But as long as there are people who are offended, you are not entitled to use your self-proclaimed superiority to offend them.

So it's "arrogant" to think someone else is a ninny? OK then, guilty as charged. (By the way, this: "But as long as there are people who are offended, you are not entitled to use your self-proclaimed superiority to offend them."
doesn't make any sense. At all. Please try to be a little more articulate.)

Now that I have your attention - why do you have to turn every conversation into a rant about religion? Are you that obsessed? I've noticed a lot of atheists who seem more obsessed about religion, if their internet behavior is any indication, than believers. It's funny to me.

I don't - I just think that people who wail and rend their garments because an anonymous poster is "disrespectful," whatever the topic, need to get a grip. And perhaps a life. And I'm not an aethiest, if you read carefully.

But yes, your "gotcha games," where you insult religion and then when some poor fool responds, you leap in with shrill cries of "over-sensitive!" are getting so, so, so old. And so, so, so predictable. Maybe we need a codename for you, like the Brazilian nanny above (FBFNFTM). You can be the Ranting Atheist Who Plays Gotcha Games (RAWPGG). But seriously, do you really want people to think all atheists are self-obsessed, arrogant five-year-olds? Wouldn't you rather present an image of atheists as being thoughtful citizens? Seriously, I'm deeply concerned about the image of atheists that you're promoting.

First, are you under the impression that "anonymous" is all the same person? I wish I had the time to post as much as you think I do. Further, please point out where I "insulted religion." I don't believe I did, and if you think saying "Jesus fucking Christ" is insulting religion, I'm not sure what to say to you. And while appreciate your concern, I think posts on this board, and the state of the world in general, indicate that the image of the devout is more tarnished than that of aethiests. (See: Primary, Republican.)

Then why ARE you saying it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, it was just a little friendly advice. I figured you'd totally mischaracterize my points and call me names, and that's exactly what you did.

So no surprises there. And for the record, you can call me all the names you want, but at the end of the day I'm still a (democratic) national merit scholarship semifinalist, and you're still an arrogant loser whose main debating strategies seem to consist of twisting my words and ad hominem attacks.

Bye, loser.

Wasn't that a long time ago?

Woohee! Three responses to the same post (and don't try to tell us you're not a sock puppet). Either you're very bored, or you're very mad.

Too bad you're unable to build a convincing argument why (a) you're so much smarter than all those other "ninnies," and trust me, all the evidence is against you, and (b) this makes it OK for you to be rude to them. So back to the ad hominem attacks you go. Why don't you mix it up, and try another gotcha game? Because the ad hominem attacks really make you look impotent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anti-vax poster here.

I'd have to say that my nemesis is the pharma-shill poster....the one who lives her life by reading the fabricated studies of big pharma.

Sigh...I feel sorry for her children. She's not the brightest poster.

^^THIS X 100000000

I love you. However, you forgot to mention that she doesn't know how to do laundry!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Recently Ayn Rand came back from the dead and started posting on DCUM. See, for example, the "My teenager is unlikable" thread in the "older kids" forum, and the posters telling OP that her teenager is great and will make a great CEO because his lack of empathy means he won't hesitate to fire all the losers. It hasn't been long, but I'm sick of her already.

PP, I believe the poster who told OP that her teenager would make a great CEO was trying to be ironic. At least, that's how I saw it.

Maybe I was wrong.

[Anonymous]

But I was cool in high school!!

Equals boorish bully. See you haven't changed much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unhappy people who blame everything on "this area"

Yes! Especially when someone voices a complaint about the rude parent at school, or someone who cut them off while driving, or whatever . . . it's nearly always met with, "This area is filled with rude/self-centered/entitled/whatever people. Can't wait to leave and go back to [wherever,] where people walk on water, and never a harsh word is spoken."

News flash - there are idiots everywhere. Even the sainted Midwest.

Especially the sainted Midwest.

[Anonymous]

national merit scholarship semifinalist

1st prize ...a car
2nd prize...a set of steak knives
3rd prize...your fired.

Semifinal? Really...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who cite wikipedia as authority.

Is DCUM really the place to break out scholarly journal articles, though?

The poster (I think it's only one) who gives 10 links to support an argument and expects us to read them all. Because, hey, providing a summary together with the link would be too much work.

Scholarly articles start with a summary. What I hate is posters who still won't budge from an ignorant point of view even when presented with 10 sources of scholarly research.

Well, it is called 'faith'.