Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Yes, but in this case we were dicussing genetics and hair color of her kids, so arguing about whether she identifies one way or another or if your grandma was a civil rights leader is irrelevant to the discussion. The fact is, Meghan is far more European white than she is African black, and Harry is very, very European white, so genetically, it is not even a little surprising that their kids are very fair skinned with strawberry blonde hair like their dad. Most likely, Megan also has fair skinned gingers in her background too, just like Harry, which is why they ended up with red haired white kids who from the limited photos look very northern European, and not kids who look more mixed ancestry. Genetics are funny. Fair, pale skin and red head should not be the dominant trait, so Meghan must have that solidly in her genetic background. |
It’s not MAGA to transfer emotions (not behaviors). It’s human. Transference actually underpins an entire part of psycho analysis. In fact, you’re transferring yourself. Anti-Meghan isn’t anti-democrat. Triggered by Meghan is triggered by Meghan. |
I love how the MAGA republicans and casual racists get so triggered by her. I’m not a royal obsessed American but this makes me laugh so hard, I’ve grown to like her more and more. |
Well you’ll be surprised when at the next anti-Trump rally, you turn to me expecting kinship and it turns out I’m very much not a Meghan fan. |
I had the same reaction. Jeez, some people are so nasty. |
Most of the people I know who are obsessed with Meghan are often really liberal women with a closet love for everything princessy who were in love with Prince Harry at some point. The ones who hate her are from all political stripes, from far left to right, but who have the common thread of a sister in law, sister, or daughter in law who went scorched earth against the family to isolate and control the husband, OR they were a victim of a bridezilla type best friend or boss. The people who hate her have that correlation of being wronged by a person like that. Meghan represents that woman, so it is easy to transfer that hate towards her, instead of expressing it to their own Meghan in real life. It has nothing to do with politics or maga. That is just a ridiculous claim. Most maga people don't care enough about her to work up a sweat, unless they fall into that category of people who have experienced real life Meghan types. But those people transcend politics. It truly is a non partisan group. |
I’m sure you have a nasty side too. That’s why you privacy is so important. |
Exactly. Almost everyone who hates on Meghan has that commin thread of a nightmare SIL/sister who is oh so sweet in public but a wrecking ball to the family, or a "friend" who is just like Meghan. |
Oh my gosh, give it a rest. |
+1. The hate comes from the fact that her core story is about her in-law relationship. If she dropped it, she’d be much better off. But she uses it. She claims the Royal Sussex identity. Anyone who’s been burned by an in-law feels that. |
Meghan's entire brand is cutting off the inlaws and family in general. When you make your brand identity cutting off the in laws as publicly and as agly as possible, you are going to draw ire in a way that a normal celebrity does not. |
She actually should have focused her brand on calligraphy and connecting through writing letters. |
Hating/Loving Meghan isn’t a big part of my identity. 😂 |
Me neither. Maybe at some point you’ll discover I’m not rabid, I’m not MAGA. I’m a normal person who votes Democrat and is a PoC. I have a crazy SIL, and I dislike Meghan. |
|
It is harmless.
Odd to post outside the family …but not raunchy in the least. |