Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So the schools are not obeying the law and still the racial discrimination.
Cut the funding already.
No! She's impressive! The activities and accolades (and maybe teacher LOR) are why she got in.
My Asian DD applied test optional (With similar test scores tbh) and got into MANY T20 schools (and is going to one of them)!
Agree! And I also have an ORM test op kid at an Ivy too....
Not sure why the hate here?
I think people don't understand what holistic admissions is.
There are a lot of us on here!!
The idiots here focused on test scores and nothing else don’t get it.
The sad and simple truth is that their children are not compelling. They are not interesting. They are not interested. And it comes across in everything they convey in the common app. They will never have the results our children have had. It has nothing to do with test scores.
I know many interesting white or Asian kids with higher stats who had nowhere near that kind of success. People who overcame disabilities, took care of sick family, did advanced college level academic work on their own for fun, etc. I know one kid who did all 3, in fact, plus the higher stats. I don’t think you understand the extent to which race sways decisions, so you are struggling to understand the extent to which people want this in the past.
But how did the kid convey it? If it wasn’t done well, none of these things matter.
In the case of the high stat kid who did all 3, you can assume the guidance counselor who read their essays felt they were very well written and their LORs were great.
For the record, I think adcoms have a very difficult job. But the argument articulated by some “they made a great decision on my ORM, so they must be making good decisions on everyone else too, and the rejected high stat kids must simply be boring” is offensively presumptuous.