It is nearly impossible to have an intelligent discussion about the issue - assuming the issue is legitimate fact based concerns about some of the work USAID is doing or the way they are doing it - given the chaotic and dangerous way the Administration is handling this. |
It's entirely possible that USAID should have been given more direction and less money. But the smart think to do would have been to roll it back over time. |
Dumb. Americans are so dumb. |
No, that's too old fashioned. The new motto is "Move fast and break things". |
IIE is a massive non-profit that receives less than $300 M/annually in grants and uses about half that amount for grants. Less than 1/4 of the grant $ it receives is used for salaries for the entire organization. You may disagree with the compensation for this position (which actually seems pretty reasonable to me) but it is quite a stretch to say our tax dollars are paying for it. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/131624046/202331949349301518/full |
Isn’t USAID funding like 1% of the total federal budget? Not saying all that money was well spent but isn’t it Congress’s job to take a hard look at programs and figure out what to keep funding? |
I don't understand why there isn't already a lawsuit--you can't cut an agency created by statute via unilateral executive action. While the "admin leave" route creates a bit of a work around, it is clearly a sham if the entire staff is being recalled and operations ceased. This development would seem to put this ridiculous move in the same bucket as the general spending freeze (that has already been enjoined by two courts). |
You're high as a kite. |
Like the person above you that told PP to choke on fumes and die? |
Waiting to go to the new beach resort opening in Middle East that is US owned. |
There is no lawsuit because the law doesn't not work anymore. They dismantled international law and they have just done the same to domestic law. |
+1 In the past you could agree or disagree about the importance of foreign aid, and still think that the Government should honor its commitments in a professional way. I am horrified at the reputational disaster that has come from USAID cancelling contracts overnight, and ordering what's left of its staff (and it's not clear who is left) to not pay out any existing obligations. I have a colleague whose wife's firm had rendered IT services for a USAID project. They have no idea when they will get paid for services they've already provided. The US reputation will be that of Trump--someone who stiffs the common people who work hard to provide services. If Republicans disagree with the relevance of foreign aid, let them reduce the budget in next year's budget allocation. Let them lay off people through a normal process of reduction in force--not this stupid firing people by Elon Musk--the South African who can't even get a security clearance who is using his unprecedented access to the US Treasury to enrich his own businesses. I am sad for the thousands of people who have already been let go from USAID and its ancillary services. I am equally sad that the USA now has the reputation of a banana republic. It is one thing to say you don't want to help the populations of other countries. It's quite another to not honor commitments that have been made--losing the reputation as a serious country and collaborator. There will be a time when the USA needs to re-enter many of these countries, whether for business or security reasons, and the damage will have been done. |
I’m not a fan of USAID spending but I strongly disagree with Trump breaking the law to stop it. Trump knows he’s in the wrong and is moving quickly to destroy the agency before the courts can act.
Any lawyers in the house can explain why there already isn’t a TRO or injunction on the Trump admin to stop this? What’s taking so long. |
Yes, CONGRESS’s job. Not Musk’s job. Or Trump’s. |
You don't even realized you've been brainwashed to think all this is normal. Yes, Congress. Tell me when they get involved |